Comparing Staples Versus Polypropylene Sutures for Mesh Fixation in Inguinal Hernia Repair in Terms of Postoperative Pain

April 5, 2026 updated by: Asna Ursani, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre

Comparative Study of Staples Versus Polypropylene Sutures for Mesh Fixation in Lichenstein's Tension-free Inguinal Hernia Repair in Terms of Postoperative Pain

This randomized controlled trial aims to compare postoperative pain between staples and polypropylene sutures used for mesh fixation in patients undergoing elective Lichtenstein tension-free inguinal hernia repair.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common general surgical procedures worldwide. The standard method for mesh fixation during Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty uses polypropylene sutures. However, skin staples have recently been introduced as a faster and potentially less painful alternative. This randomized controlled trial compares both methods in terms of postoperative pain, measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and operative time.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

168

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sindh
      • Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan, 75510
        • Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male patients aged 20 to 60 years.
  • Patients undergoing elective Lichtenstein tension-free mesh repair for unilateral, uncomplicated inguinal hernia (direct or indirect).
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) between 19 and 30 kg/m².
  • ASA physical status I, II, or III.
  • Patients willing to participate and provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diabetic patients (on medical records).
  • Bilateral or recurrent inguinal hernia.
  • Complicated hernia (irreducible, obstructed, or strangulated).
  • Patients unwilling to participate or who fail to complete follow-up.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Staples for mesh fixation
Mesh secured with stainless steel staples during Lichenstein tension-free inguinal hernioplasty
Mesh secured using stainless steel staples in Lichenstein tension-free inguinal hernioplasty
Active Comparator: Polypropylene Suture Group
Mesh secured with polypropylene sutures during Lichensteins tension-free inguinal hernioplasty
Mesh secured using polypropylene sutures in Lichenstein tension-free inguinal hernioplasty

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative pain (VAS score)
Time Frame: Postoperative day 1, day 7 and day 30
Pain intensity will be measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 0-10)
Postoperative day 1, day 7 and day 30

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Operative time (minutes)
Time Frame: During Surgery (intraoperative period)
Time in minutes from initiation of mesh fixation to completion of skin closure
During Surgery (intraoperative period)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shafqatullah, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, Pakistan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

March 28, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 3, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

This study will not share individual participant data. Only aggregated results will be published. Data will remain confidential as per institutional policy and ethical approval requirements

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inguinal Hernia

Clinical Trials on Staples for mesh fixation

Subscribe