Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction to Improve Well-being in Black Adult Cancer Survivors, Community Faith-based Mindfulness Ministry (ComFaMM)

May 7, 2025 updated by: Floyd B. Willis, MD, Mayo Clinic

Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Intervention on Patient Reported Outcomes of Black Adult Cancer Survivors: A Community Faith-based Mindfulness Ministry (ComFaMM) Trial

This clinical trial evaluates the impact of a Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) program adjusted to include Christian principles on well-being in Black adult cancer survivors. Cancer survivors face a unique set of challenges that includes not only physical but also mental and spiritual well-being. Concerns related to both diagnosis and treatment profoundly impact the quality of life of Black cancer survivors. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have been shown to be effective in improving psychological resilience, reducing anxiety, and enhancing the quality of life among cancer survivors. However, there is little research focusing on these interventions among Black adult cancer survivors. Research has shown that interventions that include cultural experiences, such as the role of religion, spirituality and faith, are more effective in maintaining psychological well-being in Black men. A MBSR program adjusted to include Christian principles may improve the well-being in Black adult cancer survivors.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Develop a culturally adapted Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) intervention. (Phase 0) II. Pilot test the MBSR intervention to assess its feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy among a small group of participants. (Phase 0)

OUTLINE:

PHASE 0:

INTERVENTION DEVELOPMENT: Participants attend a focus group or a one-on-one interview over up to 60 minutes to gather insights of the cultural needs of Black adult cancer survivors.

PILOT TESTING: Patients participate in a group discussion with exercises and activities on study.

After completion of study intervention, patients are followed up at 3 months.

PHASE 1: Patients participate in group discussions, exercises, and activities over no more than 8 hours for up to 3 sessions (up to 16 hours total) within 8 weeks.

PHASE 2: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 groups.

GROUP I (INTERVENTION): Patients participate in group discussions, exercises, and activities over no more than 8 hours for up to 3 sessions (up to 16 hours total).

GROUP II (CONTROL): Patients receive usual care on study.

After completion of study intervention, patients are followed up at 3 and 6 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

115

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32224-9980
        • Mayo Clinic in Florida

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • PHASE 0 DEVELOPMENT: Adults aged 18 or older
  • PHASE 0 DEVELOPMENT: Ability to speak, read and understand English
  • PHASE 0 DEVELOPMENT: Individuals personally affected by cancer, either through their own diagnosis or that of a loved one
  • PHASE 0 DEVELOPMENT: Self-identifies as Black or African American
  • PHASE 0 DEVELOPMENT: Membership or affiliation with a faith-based organization
  • PHASE 0 PILOT TESTING: Adults aged 18 or older
  • PHASE 0 PILOT TESTING: History of a cancer diagnosis
  • PHASE 0 PILOT TESTING: Meets National Cancer Institute (NCI) cancer survivor definition (a person is a survivor from the time of diagnosis until the end of life)
  • PHASE 0 PILOT TESTING: Ability to physically attend live MBI and complete web-based surveys and assessments
  • PHASE 0 PILOT TESTING: Ability to speak, read and understand English
  • PHASE 1: Adults aged 18 or older
  • PHASE 1: History of a cancer diagnosis
  • PHASE 1: Meets NCI cancer survivor definition (a person is a survivor from the time of diagnosis until the end of life)
  • PHASE 1: Ability to physically attend live MBI and complete web-based surveys and assessments
  • PHASE 1: Ability to speak, read and understand English
  • PHASE 2: Adults aged 18 or older
  • PHASE 2: History of a cancer diagnosis
  • PHASE 2: Meets NCI Cancer Survivor definition (a person is a survivor from the time of diagnosis until the end of life)
  • PHASE 2: Ability to physically attend live MBI and complete web-based surveys and assessments
  • PHASE 2: Ability to speak, read and understand English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • PHASE 0 DEVELOPMENT: Does not meet the inclusion criteria
  • PHASE 0 DEVELOPMENT: Unable or unwilling to participate in the recorded sessions
  • PHASE 0 PILOT TESTING: Inability to attend and participate in MBI due to medical or psychological hardship
  • PHASE 0 PILOT TESTING: Inability to speak, read and understand English
  • PHASE 1: Inability to attend and participate in MBI due to medical or psychological hardship
  • PHASE 1: Inability to speak, read and understand English
  • PHASE 1: Participated in phase 0 of the study
  • PHASE 2: Inability to attend and participate in MBI due to medical or psychological hardship
  • PHASE 2: Inability to speak, read and understand English
  • PHASE 2: Participated in phase 0 or phase 1 of the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group I (MBSR)
Patients participate in group discussions, exercises, and activities over no more than 8 hours for up to 3 sessions (up to 16 hours total).
Ancillary studies
Participate in group discussion with exercises and activities
Other Names:
  • Health Promotion (Salutogenesis)
  • Health Promotion and Wellness
  • Mindfulness Health Promotion
  • Salutogenesis
Active Comparator: Group II (control)
Patients receive usual care on study.
Ancillary studies
Receive usual care
Other Names:
  • standard of care
  • standard therapy
Experimental: Phase 0 (intervention development, pilot testing)

INTERVENTION DEVELOPMENT: Participants may attend a focus group or a one-on-one interview over up to 60 minutes to gather insights of the cultural needs of Black adult cancer survivors.

PILOT TESTING: Patients participate in a group discussion with exercises and activities on study.

Ancillary studies
Participate in group discussion with exercises and activities
Other Names:
  • Health Promotion (Salutogenesis)
  • Health Promotion and Wellness
  • Mindfulness Health Promotion
  • Salutogenesis
Attend a focus group
Other Names:
  • Discuss
Attend a one-on-one interview
Experimental: Phase 1 (MBSR)
Patients participate in group discussions, exercises, and activities over no more than 8 hours for up to 3 sessions (up to 16 hours total) within 8 weeks.
Ancillary studies
Participate in group discussion with exercises and activities
Other Names:
  • Health Promotion (Salutogenesis)
  • Health Promotion and Wellness
  • Mindfulness Health Promotion
  • Salutogenesis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Spiritual well-being
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
Will be measured by the change in scores on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp-12). The FACIT-Sp-12a is a 12-item scale measuring spiritual well-being over the past 7 days. Responses are on a 5 point Likert-type scale (0=not at all; 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat; 3=quite a bit; 4=very much) with higher scores generally representing greater well-being
Up to 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life (QOL)
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
Will be evaluated using changes in health related QOL patient reported outcomes responses. The World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF) will be used to assess spiritual, religious or personal beliefs and how these beliefs have affected QOL including positive feelings, social support, self-esteem, pain, energy, work capacity, health and social care, and leisure activities. The WHOQOL-BREF is a 26-question instrument consisting of four domains. Each individual item of the WHOQOL-BREF is scored from 1-5 on a five-point ordinal scale.
Up to 3 months
Level of resilience - CD-RISC
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
Will be measured by the Connor- Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). The CD-RISC is comprised of 25 items, each rated on a 5-point scale (0-4), with higher scores reflecting greater resilience.
Up to 3 months
Level of resilience - RSA
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
Will be measured by the Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA). The RSA examines intrapersonal and interpersonal protective factors presumed to facilitate adaptation to psychosocial adversities, as well as family and social protective factors of resilience. The RSA has 33 items; item-response ranges from one to seven; higher scores reflect higher levels of protective factors of resilience.
Up to 3 months
Personal spirituality and closeness with God
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
Will be measured by change in spiritual variable adapted from Daily Spiritual Experience Scale (DSES) to assess perceived closeness to a higher power (God). The DSES is a 16-item self-report measure designed to assess ordinary experiences of connection with the transcendent in daily life. Responses are on a 6-point scale (many times a day; every day; most days; some days; once in a while; never) or 4-point scale (not at all; somewhat close; very close; as close as possible).
Up to 3 months
Overall assessment of the MBI and perception of MBI value
Time Frame: 3 months
Will be assessed using the Was It Worth It (WIWI) questionnaire to determine changes in participants view on the worthiness of the intervention. Responses to the WIWI will capture participants' subjective evaluations of the intervention's impact. WIWI is a 3-item questionnaire with yes or no responses.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Floyd B. Willis, MD, Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 31, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 2, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 10, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MC240901 (Other Identifier: Mayo Clinic)
  • 24-006322 (Other Identifier: Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board)
  • NCI-2024-10490 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malignant Solid Neoplasm

Clinical Trials on Questionnaire Administration

Subscribe