Fluid Responsiveness and Venous Congestion Evolution During Volume Expansion (FREVO)

January 8, 2025 updated by: Xavier Monnet, Bicetre Hospital

Dynamic Assessment of Fluid Responsiveness and Venous Congestion: Evolution of the VExUS Score During Volume Expansion

Fluid responsiveness is a critical determinant guiding fluid therapy in critically ill patients. However, excessive fluid administration can result in fluid overload, leading to venous congestion and worse clinical outcomes. Venous congestion, a marker of impaired fluid clearance, is increasingly recognized as a significant contributor to poor prognosis. Previous studies have demonstrated the coexistence of fluid responsiveness and venous congestion in critically ill patients. Notably, these studies were limited by the absence of fluid challenge-the gold standard for assessing fluid responsiveness-leaving the dynamic relationship between fluid responsiveness and venous congestion incompletely understood. This study aims to investigate the interplay and temporal evolution of fluid responsiveness and venous congestion following a standardized fluid challenge in critically ill patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

64

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510080
        • Recruiting
        • First affiliated Hospital , Sun Yat-sen University
        • Contact:
      • Shenzhen, Guangdong, China, 518116
        • Recruiting
        • Longgang Central Hospital of Shenzhen
        • Contact:
    • Val-de-Marne
      • Paris, Val-de-Marne, France, 94270
        • Recruiting
        • Bicetre Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Xavier Monnet, PHD, MD
        • Contact:
          • Xiang SI, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Critically ill patients with evidence of inadequate tissue perfusion, who are already monitored using a pulse wave contour analysis-derived estimation of cardiac output (either calibrated or uncalibrated),and for whom clinicians have decided to administer volume expansion through intravenous crystalloid infusion.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU)
  • Hemodynamic monitoring in place, with a pulse wave contour analysis- derived estimation of cardiac output (either calibrated or uncalibrated)
  • Decision made by clinicians to perform volume expansion through intravenous infusion of crystalloid fluid

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Refusal to participate by relatives of the patient or the patient himself

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Fluid Responder
Patients with an aumentation of cardiac index>= 15% after a fluid challenge
Fluid Non-responder
Patients without an aumentation of cardiac index>= 15% after a fluid challenge

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The difference in venous congestion (VExUS) changes between fluid responders and non-responders following a fluid challenge.
Time Frame: before and after 15-minute fluid challenge.
before and after 15-minute fluid challenge.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The differential evolution of venous congestion (VExUS) changes between fluid responders and non-responders 1 hour after a fluid challenge.
Time Frame: 1 hour after fluid challenge
1 hour after fluid challenge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 5, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 8, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2022-A00580-43

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fluid Responsiveness

Subscribe