Recurrence Patterns and Cost-Effectiveness of Surgical Approaches in Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma

January 10, 2025 updated by: Chen Xiaoping

Recurrence Patterns and Cost-Effectiveness of Robotic-assisted, Laparoscopic, and Open Liver Resection in BCLC 0/A Hepatocellular Carcinoma:

This study aims to investigate the recurrence patterns and cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and open liver resections in patients with early-stage (BCLC 0/A) hepatocellular carcinoma. By analyzing data from 3000 patients across 27 centers, the research evaluates recurrence-free survival, overall survival, and long-term economic impacts using metrics such as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Findings will provide insights into optimal surgical approaches to improve patient outcomes and healthcare resource utilization.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

3000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430030
        • Wuhan Tongji Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This multicenter study included BCLC stage 0/A HCC patients who underwent RALR, LLR, or OLR across 27 centers from July 2017 to July 2019

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • (1) HCC diagnosis confirmed by two independent radiologists using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with postoperative pathology; (2) BCLC stage 0 or A; and (3) curative liver resection

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (1) concurrent malignancies in other organs; (2) diagnosis of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma; (3) prior neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment before liver resection; (4) recurrent HCC; (5) ruptured HCC; and (6) incomplete follow-up or missing data.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Robotic-assisted
RALR was conducted using a robotic platform, which allowed for precise dissection and 3D visualization. Robotic arms equipped with advanced energy devices facilitated delicate maneuvers, particularly in deep or difficult-to-access segments. A 3D liver model was displayed on the robotic console, enabling real-time reference during dissection. As with LLR, intraoperative ultrasound refined the tumor boundaries, and the Pringle maneuver was selectively applied when necessary.
Minimally Invasive Liver Resection In both LLR and RALR, standardized preoperative planning with 3D imaging was utilized to assess tumor location, size, and proximity to vascular structures, enabling precise port placement. Typically, four to five trocar ports were inserted based on the tumor's location, with adjustments as needed
Laparoscopic
LLR was performed using standard laparoscopic instruments, with the surgeon directly manipulating instruments for tumor resection. Intraoperative ultrasound was routinely used to confirm tumor boundaries and refine resection margins, particularly for tumors adjacent to major vascular structures. During parenchymal transection, energy devices such as laparoscopic bipolar coagulators or ultrasonic scalpels were used to minimize blood loss. The Pringle maneuver was available as needed to control bleeding.
Minimally Invasive Liver Resection In both LLR and RALR, standardized preoperative planning with 3D imaging was utilized to assess tumor location, size, and proximity to vascular structures, enabling precise port placement. Typically, four to five trocar ports were inserted based on the tumor's location, with adjustments as needed
Open Liver Resection
Open liver resection was typically performed through a right subcostal incision, extended to the midline if necessary to enhance liver access. The liver was mobilized by dividing surrounding ligaments, including the falciform, coronary, and triangular ligaments, to ensure optimal exposure of the tumor. Intraoperative ultrasound was used to confirm the exact tumor location, delineate resection margins, and detect any additional satellite nodules or vascular invasion not identified preoperatively. The Pringle maneuver, involving intermittent clamping of the portal triad, was selectively applied to control blood loss during parenchymal transection. Based on tumor characteristics, anatomical resections aimed to remove full segments, while non-anatomical resections focused on achieving negative margins (R0 resection) with minimal liver removal. Large tumors, central lesions, or cases requiring complex vascular reconstruction were typically managed with the open approach due to its direct a
Minimally Invasive Liver Resection In both LLR and RALR, standardized preoperative planning with 3D imaging was utilized to assess tumor location, size, and proximity to vascular structures, enabling precise port placement. Typically, four to five trocar ports were inserted based on the tumor's location, with adjustments as needed

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Recurrence-free Surival
Time Frame: 2017-01-01--2024-01-01
2017-01-01--2024-01-01

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 15, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

November 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 10, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HCC - Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Liver Surgery

Subscribe