Comparison Between 2 Treatment Modalities of Trigger Finger: Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Release of A1 Pulley by a Needle Knife Versus Ultrasound-guided Corticosteroid Injection in the Treatment of Trigger Finger

January 15, 2025 updated by: Nouran Khalid Ibrahim Sallam, Mansoura University Hospital

Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Release of A1 Pulley by a Needle Knife Versus Ultrasound-guided Corticosteroid Injection in the Treatment of Trigger Finger: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Trigger finger is a common cause of hand disability and pain in the general population. It is a pathologic condition of the digital pulleys and flexor tendons. Although the pathogenesis is incompletely clear and multifactorial, the most common cause of the trigger finger is the thickened flexor tendon and/or thickened first annular (A1) pulley located at the metacarpophalangeal joint. Currently, ultrasound is considered an effective and valuable tool for assessing the trigger finger, providing static and dynamic evaluations of this condition and a comparison with the adjacent normal digits. Recently, it has been reported that ultrasound-guided percutaneous A1 pulley precise release using a needle knife has received increasing attention in the clinical treatment of trigger fingers and achieved good results. To our knowledge, this is the first clinical study comparing the efficacy and safety of ultrasonic-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release with a needle knife and the ultrasonic-guided steroid injection in treating trigger fingers.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Mansoura, Egypt
        • Mansoura university hospitals

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Idiopathic trigger finger
  • Trigger finger at the level of A1 pulley
  • Trigger finger of Green's grades II or III

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with secondary causes of trigger fingers like diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, hypothyroidism, amyloidosis, and sarcoidosis.
  • Patients with a previous history of first annular pulley release or injection.
  • Patients with trigger fingers of Green's grade I and IV.
  • Patients with trigger fingers at any level other than the A1 pulley.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Patients undergoing ultrasonography-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release using a needle knife
ultrasonography-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release using a needle knife
Active Comparator: Patients undergoing ultrasonography-guided corticosteroid injection under the A1 pulley
ultrasonography-guided corticosteroid injection under the A1 pulley

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Pain intensity using the visual analog scale (VAS) scoring system
Time Frame: Before the procedure as well as after one week, one month, and three months
Before the procedure as well as after one week, one month, and three months
Functional ability according to the standard quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand score (Q DASH) questionnaire
Time Frame: Before the procedure as well as after one week, one month, and three months
Before the procedure as well as after one week, one month, and three months
Recurrence: The grade of trigger finger according to Green's classification
Time Frame: Before the procedure as well as after one week, one month, and three months
Before the procedure as well as after one week, one month, and three months
Complications such as inflammation, infection, scarring, wound healing problems, and sensory changes
Time Frame: After one week of the procedure
After one week of the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 11, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 15, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Trigger Finger

Clinical Trials on Needle knife

Subscribe