Neuromodulation of the Dorsal Genital Nerve in Persistent Genital Arousal Disorder (NemoPGAD)

April 22, 2025 updated by: Radboud University Medical Center

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if neuromodulation of the dorsal genital nerve works to treat symptoms related to Persistent Genital Arousal Disorder in women. The main questions it aims to answer are:

What is the effect of neuromodulation on PGAD symptoms in women?

Participants will:

Use a neurosimulator every day for 3 weeks. Keep a diary of their symptoms and the number of times they used the neurostimulator Fill in questionaires

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nijmegen, Netherlands
        • Radboud Unversity Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women with PGAD

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women < 18 years
  • Women not able to handle the neuromodulator
  • Women in whom the anatomy of the genitals precludes proper electrode placement

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Neuromodulation
Neuromodulation every day, for 3 weeks
Neuromodulation by UCon

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Symptom severity
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Symptom severity on a 5-point Likert scale, filled in daily. 1 indicates no symptoms at all, 5 indicates very severe symptoms.
8 weeks
Neuromodulation effect
Time Frame: 3 weeks
The neuromodulation effect will be assessed using a self-reported diary, where participants are prompted daily to rate their experience of symptoms in response to the question: "How do you experience your symptoms today?" Responses are recorded on a 5-point Likert scale with the following options: "No problem," "Mild," "Moderate," "Severe," or "Very severe." This dairy is quaried during the three weeks intervention period, in which the participants use the neuromodulator device daily.
3 weeks
Satisfaction device
Time Frame: At the end of the treatment, at week 8
The consideration of using the neuromodulator device as part of their treatment, which was asked at the end of the treatment with the question "Would you like to continue using the device as part of your treatment". Following with a 'Yes' or 'No' answer.
At the end of the treatment, at week 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HADS
Time Frame: At baseline, at the end of the intervention (week 3) and at the end of post-intervention (week 8)

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, measuring the level of anxiety and depression, both scores ranging from 0 to 21:

0-7 : no anxiety disorder or depression 8-10 : possible anxiety disorder or depression 11-21: suspected anxiety disorder or depression

At baseline, at the end of the intervention (week 3) and at the end of post-intervention (week 8)
PCS
Time Frame: At baseline, at the end of the intervention (week 3) and at the end of post-intervention (week 8)
Pain Catestrophizing Scale. Score ranging from 0 to 52, in which a higher score indicates a higher level of pain catestrophizing.
At baseline, at the end of the intervention (week 3) and at the end of post-intervention (week 8)
QoL
Time Frame: At baseline, at the end of the intervention (week 3) and at the end of post-intervention (week 8)

Quality of Life measured with the EQ-5D-3L (EuroQol-5 Dimensions-3 Levels). The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state.

The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'Worst imaginable health state'. Higher EQ VAS score indicated higher self-related health.

At baseline, at the end of the intervention (week 3) and at the end of post-intervention (week 8)
Patient Global Impression of Improvement
Time Frame: During follow-up (after week 8)
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) is a scale to rate the patients condition now, as compared with how it was prior to before beginning treatment on a scale from 1. Very much better to 7. Very much worse.
During follow-up (after week 8)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 26, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

April 22, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 10, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 24, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2023-16221

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arousal Disorders, Sexual

Clinical Trials on Neuromodulation

Subscribe