Effectiveness of Activity Oriented Therapy and Traditional Therapy in Cervical Discopathic Pain Syndrome

Title: Effectiveness of Activity Oriented Therapy and Traditional Therapy in Cervical Discopathic Pain Syndrome

Procedures: You will be asked to complete a form containing questions characterizing the study group and several questionnaires before starting treatment, such as: NDI, CESD-R, STAI and the NRS scale. A photo of the head and shoulder area will also be taken in a front and side standing position. After completing the two-week treatment, you will be asked again to complete questionnaires and pose for photos. You will be informed about a follow-up visit 3 months after the end of therapy, during which you will be asked for the last time to complete questionnaires and pose for a photo.

Benefits: There are no direct benefits to you other than participating in a therapy more commonly used for cervical pain syndromes and the opportunity to discuss your experience with neck pain with a specialist. The information we obtain will help scientists better understand the problem of treating neck pain.

Risk: There are no physical risks to you while conducting this research. All information obtained from you will be anonymous. Your name and image will not be used in this study or reports.

Confidentiality: All research records will be confidential and appropriately secured. Records will only be published with your consent or by court order or as required by law. Any publication resulting from this research will not use identifying information, such as your name or likeness.

Freedom to opt out: Participation in the study is completely voluntary and free of charge. You may withdraw from this study at any time without any consequences.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Activity Oriented Therapy (N.A.P. therapy) and traditional therapy during disc-related neck pain in terms of pain intensity, disability, Forward Head Posture (FHP), anxiety as a condition and level of depression. Patients were qualified based on a medical examination. Respondents were randomly divided into two groups.

The therapies were performed by experienced physiotherapists in cooperation with a psychologist. Treatment in both groups included 10 therapy sessions held daily from Monday to Friday over a two-week period.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

74

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kraków, Poland
        • Rehabilitation Clinic "Azory"

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • qualifying: non-traumatic, disc-like, chronic (symptoms lasting more than 3 months) cervical pain of mechanical origin, localized in the cervical region with the possibility of radiation to the upper edge of the scapula and head (without root symptoms and neurological disorders), classified as syndrome No. 1 according to the Quebec Task Force (QTF) Classification, and a condition not requiring surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • comorbid advanced neurological, rheumatic, urological, psychiatric diseases, and unsystematic participation in in therapy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: N.A.P. therapy group
Activity Oriented therapy (N.A.P.) is based on the assumption that motor activity affects the plasticity of the brain and it stimulates a positive change in its cortical representation. The therapist use motor teaching techniques, postural control exercises and improving respiratory functions. Breathing exercises are used to reduce nervous system stimulation, activating the parasympathetic system and relaxing the body and mind. Additionally, diaphragm exercises affect the stabilization of the spine muscles.

The following six exercises were used, each of which was performed 10 times. Their progression was introduced by changing positions, individually adjusted to the patient's capabilities.

  1. Eccentric infrahyoid muscle work during breathing activity and phonation of the "l"sound.
  2. Reciprocal innervation of suboccipital muscles in gaze activity.
  3. Stimulation of the diaphragm in the activity of breathing and phonation.
  4. Repeated eccentric activity of the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscles during body transfer activity.
  5. Repeated eccentric activity of scalene muscles in blanket pulling activity.
  6. Eccentric work of suboccipital muscles in the activity of biting a snack.
Active Comparator: Traditional therapy group
In Poland, traditional treatment of neck pain includes physical treatments (e.g. cryotherapy or TENS) and exercises to strengthen and improve the range of muscles in the shoulder girdle and neck. Research shows that these interventions provide good benefits in the treatment of neck pain immediately after therapy, but there is often a lack of information about how this change is maintained over time. Considering the psychological aspect of chronic pain, such actions may not be sufficient to effectively cure the problem.

Traditional therapy included:

  1. Isometric work of the neck muscles.
  2. Self-assisted active exercises for the shoulder girdle muscles.
  3. Active exercises in relief for the muscles of the shoulder girdle performed in the sitting position in the transverse plane.
  4. TENS current treatment performed in the cervical spine and shoulder girdle in the forward lying position.
  5. The local cryotherapy treatment with carbon dioxide.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: Before therapy, after two weeks of treatment and after 3 months of follow-up
The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), which contains 11 levels of pain intensity, where 0 means no pain and 10 means maximum pain
Before therapy, after two weeks of treatment and after 3 months of follow-up
The Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Time Frame: Before therapy, after two weeks of treatment and after 3 months of follow-up
The Neck Disability Index (NDI) questionnaire, which examines the level of disability from NP. A patient can score between 0 and 50 points. A score between 1-4 points indicates no disability, 5-14 points mild disability, 15-24 points moderate disability, 25-34 points severe disability, and above 35 points total disability.
Before therapy, after two weeks of treatment and after 3 months of follow-up
The photographic method to assess Forward Head Posture (FHP)
Time Frame: Before therapy, after two weeks of treatment and after 3 months of follow-up
The photographic method to assess FHP. Based on photographs of the shoulder area and head taken in the forward and lateral standing positions, two angles were measured using the computer program GIMP (version 2.10.34). The camera was placed on a tripod at a distance of 150 cm from the patient. Cranio Vertebral Angle (CVA) was measured in the sagittal plane, while Frontal Head Tilt angle (FHT) was measured in the frontal plane. A higher score for CVA and a lower score for FHT indicate improvement in FHP. The reliability of the described procedure is rated as high. In the author's study, images were taken with a SONY DSC-W810B camera.
Before therapy, after two weeks of treatment and after 3 months of follow-up
The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Time Frame: Before therapy, after two weeks of treatment and after 3 months of follow-up
The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), which examines the level of anxiety understood as a transient and situationally conditioned state of the individual and anxiety as a relatively stable personality trait. The STAI consists of two subscales, but only the scale for measuring anxiety-state (X-1) was used in this study. Each subscale can be scored from 20 to 80. High values indicate higher levels of anxiety.
Before therapy, after two weeks of treatment and after 3 months of follow-up
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale-Revised (CESD-R)
Time Frame: Before therapy, after two weeks of treatment and after 3 months of follow-up
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale-Revised (CESD-R). This is a self-report scale that examines levels of depression. It consists of 20 statements relating to mood and behavior observed over the past two weeks. The lowest score is 0 and the highest score is 80. The higher the scores, the higher the level of depression.
Before therapy, after two weeks of treatment and after 3 months of follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 18, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

April 8, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 27, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

The article includes data such as age, gender and duration of symptoms.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety Disorders

Clinical Trials on Activity Oriented therapy (N.A.P.)

Subscribe