Academic Detailing to Optimize PrEP Implementation in Pediatric Primary Care Settings: ADOPT-PrEP (ADOPT-PrEP)

January 23, 2026 updated by: Carly Guss, Boston Children's Hospital
In this study, 50 pediatricians will participate in academic detailing, an evidence-based, 1-on-1 outreach education technique intended to promote clinician behavior change through brief, highly interactive, and individualized dialogues with trained educators, or "detailers". The goals of this study are to learn about whether this is a practical and acceptable technique, and whether it changes how pediatricians prescribe pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to adolescents and young adults (AYA) and how patients take it.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Adolescents and young adults (AYA) account for nearly 20% of new HIV diagnoses in the US. Only 10% of sexually active adolescents have ever been tested for HIV2 and very few have used pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), despite it being safe, highly effective at preventing HIV transmission, and FDA-approved for youth. Pediatric health care providers (physicians and associate clinicians) could have a major impact on PrEP use for youth, as they are trusted sources of health information for AYA. However, pediatricians infrequently discuss or recommend PrEP due to limited training in sexual health and PrEP and a lack of tools and protocols to help them integrate PrEP into busy clinical workflows. Academic detailing, an evidence-based, 1-on-1 educational outreach technique for clinicians proven to change prescribing behaviors, could improve PrEP prescribing and persistence for AYA. Academic detailing has been associated with substantial increases in PrEP prescribing in adult settings but has not been tested in pediatric settings. The objective of this study is to develop an implementation strategy to improve PrEP provision to AYA at a large children's hospital and affiliated community health center in an HIV priority jurisdiction. Our hypothesis is that academic detailing for PrEP that has been adapted for a pediatric and young adult population will be feasible, acceptable, and result in rapid, sustained, and clinically significant improvements in PrEP provision in pediatric settings.

After conducting qualitative interviews with AYA and pediatric providers to explore barriers and facilitators and to them develop materials specific to this study, we will conduct a pilot study of academic detailing amongst 50 pediatric providers in the Boston area. Providers will be recruited from Boston-area practices and invited to participated in the pilot project. Providers will complete 2 academic detailing visits and a post-visit qualitative interview and survey to assess feasibility and acceptability. Secondary outcomes include preliminary impact of academic detailing on their knowledge, intentions and readiness to prescribe PrEP, and changes in PrEP prescriptions, persistence, and HIV testing after the intervention through electronic medical record review.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Boston Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Primary care provider at one of our 3 study sites (Boston Children's Hospital Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Martha Eliot Health Center, Children's Hospital Primary Care Center)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: pediatricians
Academic detailing is an evidence-based, 1-on-1 outreach education technique intended to promote clinician behavior change. Information gained during earlier focus groups will be used to develop study-specific materials.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility
Time Frame: From enrollment to end of study interview at 4 months
Feasibility will be assessed using survey question from other academic detailing campaigns and assessed on a 5-point Likert scale. Questions will be: "the key messages are feasible to implement in my practice" (1= not at all through 5= extremely)
From enrollment to end of study interview at 4 months
Feasibility
Time Frame: From enrollment to end of second academic detailing session at 1 month
Feasibility of academic detailing based on number of enrolled providers who complete both academic detailing visits
From enrollment to end of second academic detailing session at 1 month
Acceptability
Time Frame: From enrollment to end of second academic detailing visit at 1 month.
Acceptability of academic detailing as measured by provider satisfaction with the academic detailing visit. This will be assessed via the Prescriber Satisfaction with Academic Detailing questionnaire (PSAD). Answers are on a 5 point Likert scale (1=not at all through 5=extremely).
From enrollment to end of second academic detailing visit at 1 month.
Acceptability
Time Frame: From enrollment to end of second academic detailing session at 1 month
Acceptability of academic detailing based on completion of academic detailing sessions
From enrollment to end of second academic detailing session at 1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Impact of academic detailing on PrEP knowledge and prescribing
Time Frame: From enrollment to end of study interview at 4 months
Preliminary impact of academic detailing on their knowledge, intentions and readiness to prescribe PrEP. This will be assessed via adapted questionnaires from other academic detailing campaigns. Questions will be assessed on a 5 point Likert scale (1=strongly agree through 5= strongly disagree). Example questions include: "I am or would be comfortable prescribing and managing patients on PrEP;" "I am willing to talk to my patients about PrEP if it might be indicated."
From enrollment to end of study interview at 4 months
Change in PrEP Prescriptions
Time Frame: From 6 months prior to enrollment to 6 months after intervention
Changes in PrEP prescriptions provided by participants to their patients by review of electronic medical record following academic detailing intervention. This will include refills of oral PrEP medications and on-time injections of injectable PrEP.
From 6 months prior to enrollment to 6 months after intervention
HIV Testing
Time Frame: From 6 months prior to enrollment to 6 months after academic detailing intervention
Participant rates of HIV testing of their patients by review of the medical record.
From 6 months prior to enrollment to 6 months after academic detailing intervention
Fidelity to intervention
Time Frame: From enrollment to end of second academic detailing visit at 1 month.
Fidelity will be assessed by having academic detailers observe each other and then will provide feedback on adherence to academic detailing procedures by using a structured checklist (e.g., detailer delivers key messages, seeks commitment to behavior change from pediatrician).
From enrollment to end of second academic detailing visit at 1 month.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2027

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 30, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 30, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 22, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

February 3, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 26, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

IPD will not be shared due to participant privacy and data de-identification needs.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on PrEP

Clinical Trials on Academic detailing

Subscribe