Maintaining Implementation Through Dynamic Adaptations (MIDAS) Suicide Prevention 2.0 Clinical Telehealth (MIDAS SPCT)

December 8, 2025 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

Maintaining Implementation Through Dynamic Adaptations (MIDAS) - Suicide Prevention 2.0 Clinical Telehealth (SP 2.0) (QUE 20-025)

Scientific advances are constantly leading to better treatments. However, it is quite challenging for healthcare systems, including VA, to ask very busy providers to change the way they practice. The MIDAS QUERI program helps providers improve the way they treat VA patients. This project will focus on increasing referrals to the Suicide Prevention 2.0 Clinical Telehealth (SP 2.0) initiative through the delivery of Academic Detailing and LEAP (a team-based quality improvement program). SP 2.0 provides accessible, evidence-based suicide prevention treatment to all Veterans with a history of suicidal self-directed violence or preparatory behaviors in the past 12 months.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Sustained integration of evidence-based practices (EBPs) is a challenge within many healthcare systems, especially in settings that have already strived but failed to achieve longer-term goals. The Veterans Affairs (VA) Maintaining Implementation through Dynamic Adaptations (MIDAS) Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) program was funded as a series of trials to test multi-component implementation strategies to sustain optimal use of EBPs. The current project focuses on increasing referrals to the Suicide Prevention 2.0 Clinical Telehealth (SP 2.0) initiative.

The investigators have recruited 4 sites for this non-randomized intervention project. Sites have agreed to participate in pre-implementation interviews to gather information regarding barriers and facilitators to use of the SP 2.0 initiative. Sites will then be provided with tailored feedback regarding interview findings and potential use of Academic Detailing and LEAP to address these. Sites may then select to receive either Academic Detailing and/or LEAP which will be provided by MIDAS QUERI. Primary outcome will be rate of SP 2.0 referral adjusted for pre-intervention rate.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

4

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48105-2303
        • VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Note- the investigators are recruiting clinics/medical centers - not individual patients. Prior to implementation, the investigators will work with sites to ensure they have met the preconditions necessary to begin sustained optimization of the EBP:

  • 1) a team leader or champion
  • 2) an identified department with service leadership buy-in and control over the processes/practices impacted by the implementation
  • 3) readily accessible data to measure process and impact of the implementation and use of the EBP
  • 4) availability of required resources

Exclusion Criteria:

  • N/A

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
A multi-faceted implementation intervention including qualitative interviews and feedback and optional delivery of Academic Detailing and/or LEAP.
Learn. Engage. Act. Process (LEAP) program is a structured 6-month core curriculum plus 6 monthly collaborative sessions. The LEAP quality improvement program engages frontline teams in sustained incremental improvements of EBPs over a six-month period, allowing space for busy clinicians to learn and immediately apply fundamental QI skills. LEAP encompasses: 1) a structured, accessible curriculum based on the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's (IHI) Model for Improvement and Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles of change; 2) team-based, hands-on learning, and 3) coaching support and a QI network to enhance learning and accountability.
The National Resource Center for Academic Detailing (NaRCAD) describes AD as "an innovative, one-on-one outreach education technique that helps clinicians provide evidence-based care to their patients. Using an accurate, up-to-date synthesis of the best clinical evidence in an engaging format, academic detailers ignite clinician behavior change, ultimately improving patient health. A successful AD visit is highly interactive, always a dialogue, and assesses a clinician's individual needs, beliefs, attitudes, issues, and concerns in order to promote better [practice]."

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SP2Clin Metric
Time Frame: Baseline to 12-months post-baseline
The quarterly SP2Clin metric data is reported and available on a VA national dashboard. The SP2Clin metric is calculated by the number of suicide prevention telehealth consults submitted among those with a suicide behavior event.
Baseline to 12-months post-baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Number of Consults to SP 2.0 Clinic
Time Frame: Baseline to 12-months post-baseline
Change in number of telehealth consults to the Suicide Prevention 2.0 Clinical Telehealth (SP 2.0) initiative.
Baseline to 12-months post-baseline

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Quality Improvement Skills Application
Time Frame: Baseline to 12-months post-baseline
16-item measure of change in quality improvement skills application. Values 1 to 4 where higher values indicate more frequent use of quality improvement skills.
Baseline to 12-months post-baseline
Provider Satisfaction With Academic Detailing
Time Frame: Post-first Academic Detailing session
7-items measuring satisfaction with Academic Detailing. Each response option uses a Likert-type scale with values 1 to 5 where higher values indicate higher satisfaction.
Post-first Academic Detailing session
Change in Provider Satisfaction With LEAP
Time Frame: Baseline to 12-months post-baseline
6-item measure of satisfaction with LEAP. Values 1 to 5 where higher values indicate higher satisfaction.
Baseline to 12-months post-baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paul N Pfeiffer, MD MS, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
  • Principal Investigator: Jeremy B. Sussman, MD MS, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
  • Principal Investigator: Jacob E Kurlander, MD MS MS, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 29, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

August 29, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 16, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 25, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Site-level data that underlie results reported, after de-identification will be available.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

For 36 months after article is published.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Upon request by researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. Further details will be available.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Suicidal Self-directed Violence

Clinical Trials on LEAP

Subscribe