Novel Approach to Conduction System Pacing With Use of Ultrasound (CONDUCT USe)

May 8, 2025 updated by: Habib Khan

Reduction of Radiation and Improving Conduction System Pacing Using Ultrasound (CONDUCT USe)

Each year, over one million pacemakers are implanted globally using x-rays. Recent developments have been aimed at determining which area of the heart is the best option for lead placement. An area in the septum separating the verticals called the left bundle branch area (LBBA) has previously been identified as a safe and effective area for lead placement. However, as the LBBA location is in the center of the heart, it is impossible to see the entire extent using X-ray. Current practice requires x-ray guidance to estimate the location and pacing parameters to confirm proximity. Implanting in LBBA takes longer procedure times and higher exposure to X-ray radiation for both patients and hospital staff. Over time, radiation poses an increased risk of cancer and other medical issues.

This study will determine if using ultrasound can improve pacemaker lead implantation to the LBBA. Benefits to patients may include fewer attempts and more accuracy in lead deployment, thereby reducing risks and providing improved outcomes. Benefits to healthcare delivery may include reduction in total procedure time, thereby allowing more cases per day to reduce waitlist, and reduced X-ray exposure to staff thereby reducing cumulative effects.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

152

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A5A5
        • London Health Sciences Centre - University Hospital
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6G5A5
        • London Health Sciences Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria: Patients meeting the following criteria are eligible for the study:

  1. Male or female ≥18 years of age
  2. Eligible to have a single or dual chamber pacemaker implanted for LBBAP
  3. Confirmed diagnosis of conduction tissue disease
  4. The participant can understand the written informed consent/assent, provides signed and witnessed written informed consent/assent, and agrees to comply with protocol requirements.
  5. Good imaging quality determined on routine echocardiography

Exclusion Criteria: Patients will be excluded if any one of the following criteria is met:

  1. Any medical or psychiatric condition that, in the investigator's opinion, could jeopardize or compromise the participant's ability to participate in the study.
  2. Any acute active malignancy requiring treatment or life expectancy is deemed less than 1 year.
  3. Clinically significant disease that increases their risk of bleeding (hematological disorders, dialysis patient - anticoagulation does not apply)
  4. History of alcohol or drug (other than caffeine) use disorder within 12 months of pacemaker implantation.
  5. Hepatic impairment defined as ALT/AST >3 × ULN and/or total bilirubin >ULN, at Screening.
  6. The participant has any clinically significant illness, in the opinion of the investigator, prior to their pacemaker implantation
  7. Any other issues which, in the opinion of the investigator, will make the participant ineligible for study participation.
  8. CRT and ICD implants.
  9. Pregnancy or female of childbearing age (if negative pregnancy test not provided).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional
Normal deployment of left bundle branch area pacing with use of xrays and fluoroscopy. No use of ultrasound in the procedure.
Conventional techniques for implanting LBBAP lead
Experimental: US guided
Patients randomized to this arm will have use of ultrasound in venous access and particularly in attempts to place the pacing lead in the septum at the region of LBBA. This will allow the lead to be directly visualized as it is being passed deep into the septum without perforation and it ensure that the lead is perpendicular to the septum.
Use of ultrasound in group 2

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Composite of the Following
Time Frame: During study procedure and through study completion, an average of 12 months
  1. Greater than two attempts at lead deployment to successfully achieve LBBAP
  2. Septal perforation
  3. Worsening tricuspid regurgitation category
  4. Development of LV septal pacing during follow-up
During study procedure and through study completion, an average of 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Procedure Time
Time Frame: During procedure
During procedure
Total Radiation Dose
Time Frame: During procedure
During procedure
Change of LBBAP pacing parameters
Time Frame: From procedure to 1 week
Threshold @ 0.4ms pulse width, sensing, impedance
From procedure to 1 week
Change of LBBAP pacing parameters
Time Frame: From procedure to 1 year
Threshold @ 0.4ms pulse width, sensing, impedance
From procedure to 1 year
Left Ventricular Activation using 2D Speckled Tracking LV Strain (TomTec)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 12 months
Through study completion, an average of 12 months
LVEF Improvement
Time Frame: From baseline to 12 months
From baseline to 12 months
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 12 months
Through study completion, an average of 12 months
Differences in Quality of Life - EQ5D
Time Frame: From baseline to 12 months
From baseline to 12 months
Amount of Tricuspid Regurgitation
Time Frame: Through study completion during echocardiography studies, an average of 12 months
Measured in mmHg
Through study completion during echocardiography studies, an average of 12 months
Change in NTproBNP
Time Frame: From baseline to 12 months
From baseline to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 10, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

February 7, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bundle-Branch Block

Clinical Trials on Fluoroscopy guided

Subscribe