Prediction of Outcome by Echocardiography in Left Bundle Branch Block (EchoLBBB)

May 18, 2022 updated by: Assami Rosner, University Hospital of North Norway

Prediction of Heart-failure and Mortality by Echocardiographic Parameters and Machine Learning in Individuals With Left Bundle Branch Block

Patients with left bundle branch block have an increased risk for the development of heart-failure and death. However, risk factors for unfavorable outcomes are still poorly defined. This study aims to identify echocardiographic parameters and ECG characteristics by machine learning in order to develop individual risk assessment

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

The project investigates patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) which describes a specific block in the electrical conduction system, where the electrical impulses must follow a detour, with the result that different parts of the heart-muscle do not contract at the same time. This condition is called left ventricular dyssynchrony. LBBB can be found in people who are otherwise completely healthy and need not have any practical consequences. In others LBBB is present in patients with different heart diseases such as after myocardial infarctions or other diseases involving the heart-muscle. Patients with implanted pacemakers have a similar failure in the conduction system. Both conditions can increase the risk for development of heart-failure and cardiovascular death. Dyssynchrony can be treated with a special pacemaker (cardiac resynchronisation therapy, CRT) in addition to regular medical treatment. The therapy is well established and has shown to reduce morbidity and mortality and even reverse heart-failure in some patients completely. However, the patients in need and responding to CRT treatment is still not optimally defined. New echocardiographic parameters based on strain imaging such as regional myocardial work are able quantify the degree of dyssynchrony and give new insights into the interplay of activation delay through the LBBB and loading conditions and weakness of the myocardium due to other diseases. These new and complex measures can be integrated with clinical information by machine learning (ML) as a promising tools for accurate patient selection for CRT. The project aims to find markers on ultrasound improved by ML based selection to distinguish those patients who have problems associated with the branch block from those who remain stable. This will facilitate both, an optimized patient selection for CRT treatment and follow-up schedule for those who have a stable condition.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

2000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Troms
      • Tromsø, Troms, Norway, 9038
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital North Norway
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients will be recruited based on epidemiological studies from Tromsø, where LBBB or ventricular pacing has been identified. Further in-hospital patients and patients from the out-patient clinics will be recruited due to ECG assessment

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • QRS complex >130 ms and R-wave duration in
  • V6 >70 ms
  • ventricular pacing>50%
  • Previously implanted cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Typical right bundle branch block.
  • No ability to give informed consent,
  • non-cardiovascular co-mobidities with reduced life-expectancy < 1 year
  • patients with complex congenital heart disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cardiovascular death
Time Frame: 15 years
Timepoint (day) of death and its cause
15 years
Death of any cause
Time Frame: 15 years
Timepoint (day) of death and its cause
15 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital admission due to heart-failure
Time Frame: 15 years
Time point of hospital admission and main-diagnosis
15 years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Remodelling
Time Frame: 5 years
Increase or decrease of ventricular volume in ml
5 years
Cardiac function
Time Frame: 5 years
Increase or decrease of ejection fraction in %
5 years
Heart failure
Time Frame: 5 years
Increase or decrease of heart failure by proBNP and NYHA class
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Assami Rösner, MD,PhD, University Hospital North Norway

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2036

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 3, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 24, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

All individual analytic codes for participants fom other Norwegian Hospitals need to be transferred to University Hospital North Norway (UNN) for registering outcome follow-up

IPD Sharing Time Frame

15 years

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Patient have been included and five-year outcome data will have been revised.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)
  • Analytic Code

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Left Bundle-Branch Block

3
Subscribe