Comparing CPAP and BiPAP for Sleep-Disordered Breathing in People with Cervical Spinal Cord Injuries

February 6, 2025 updated by: Najib Ayas, University of British Columbia

Comparison Between CPAP and BiPAP for Management of Sleep Disordered Breathing in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Patients: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Study

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is common in individuals with cervical spinal cord injuries, with studies suggesting prevalence rates ranging from 27% to 62%. The condition often leads to daytime sleepiness, fatigue, and poor participation in rehabilitation. Positive airway pressure therapy can be used to treat the condition; however, some individuals find continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), which applies the same pressure during inhalation and exhalation, difficult to use. Bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) offers different pressures for inhalation and exhalation, which may be more comfortable and potentially improve adherence in this patient population. However, limited evidence compares CPAP and BiPAP in individuals with cervical spinal cord injuries.

This pilot study will enroll 32 adult participants with cervical spinal cord injuries who have moderate to severe SDB (defined as an AHI of 15 events/hour or greater). Participants will be randomly assigned to either CPAP or BiPAP therapy for 4 weeks. Device usage per night will be measured, and data on daytime sleepiness, fatigue, and sleep quality will be collected at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks. The investigators aim to determine whether BiPAP improves adherence and symptoms compared to CPAP in this patient population.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 2G9
        • GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >= 19 years
  • Cervical spinal cord injury (ASIA A, B, or C). This will include patients with upper (C1-C4) and lower (C5-C7) spinal cord injuries
  • Presence of sleep disordered breathing, defined as AHI > =15 events/hour by home sleep apnea test (HSAT)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • On CPAP or BiPAP prior to spinal cord injury
  • Hypoventilation syndrome (elevated venous carbon dioxide, PvCO2>50 mm Hg)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CPAP Therapy
Participants randomized to this group will receive auto-CPAP therapy. The device will be initiated by a respiratory therapist at GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre. Settings will be adjusted to achieve a device efficacy index < 5 events per hour.
Experimental: BiPAP Therapy
Participants will receive BiPAP S mode therapy for 4 weeks. The device will be initiated by a respiratory therapist at GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre with initial settings of IPAP 8 cmH2O and EPAP 3 cmH2O. Settings will be modified to a maximum tolerated level to achieve a tidal volume of 8 mL/kg ideal body weight and SpO2 > 95%. Overnight oximetry will be performed to ensure at least 4 hours of device use, and settings will be adjusted to achieve a DEI < 5 events per hour.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence to PAP Therapy
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Median hours of PAP device use per night, objectively measured via device download. Additional metrics include: % days used >4 hrs/night, total # of days used, total # of hours used.
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Daytime Sleepiness
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Measured using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). ESS is a self-administered questionnaire that asks participants to rate their likelihood of dozing off or falling asleep in eight different situations that are common in daily life. Scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater daytime sleepiness.
4 weeks
Sleep Quality
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The PSQI is a self-rated questionnaire that assesses sleep quality over the past month. The PSQI yields seven component scores, each ranging from 0 to 3, which are summed to produce a global PSQI score ranging from 0 to 21. Higher global PSQI scores indicate poorer sleep quality.
4 weeks
Fatigue
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Measured using the PROMIS-Fatigue (PROMIS-F) scale. The PROMIS-F is a standardized, self-reported measure of fatigue. PROMIS-F T-scores are standardized to a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher T-scores indicate greater fatigue.
4 weeks
PAP side effects
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Assessed using a PAP therapy side effect survey. This survey will collect information about any side effects experienced by participants as a result of using the PAP devices.
4 weeks
Recruitment Rate
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Helps assess the feasibility of recruiting this specific patient population for future, larger studies. Also helps us understand if there are any barriers to participation that need to be addressed in future research. Recruitment rate will be assessed as the average number of participants enrolled per month during the recruitment period.
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sleep Apnea

Clinical Trials on CPAP

Subscribe