- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06840145
Biomarkers of Neurodegeneration and Neuroplasticity in Parkinson's Disease Patients Treated by Bilateral M1-iTBS
Biomarkers of Neurodegeneration and Neuroplasticity in Parkinson's Disease Patients Treated by Intermittent Theta-burst Stimulation Over the Bilateral Primary Motor Area: a Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled, Crossover Trial Study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Background and objectives:
Intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) is a patterned form of excitatory transcranial magnetic stimulation that has yielded encouraging results as an adjunctive therapeutic option to alleviate the emergence of clinical deficits in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. Although it has been demonstrated that iTBS influences dopamine-dependent cortico-striatal plasticity, little research has examined the neurobiological mechanisms underlying iTBS-induce clinical enhancement. Here, the primary goal is to verify whether iTBS bilaterally delivered over the primary motor cortex (M1) is effective at reducing both scoring motor functioning and non-motor symptoms in PD. The investigators hypothesize that these clinical improvements following bilateral M1-iTBS could be driven by endogenous dopamine release, which may rebalance cortical excitability and restore compensatory striatal volume changes, resulting in increased striatal-cortical-cerebellar functional connectivity, and positively impacting neuroglia and neuroplasticity modification.
Methods:
A total of 24 PD patients will be assessed in a crossover, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled protocol study involving application of iTBS over the bilateral M1 (M1 iTBS). Patients on medication will be randomly assigned to receive real iTBS or control (sham) stimulation and will undergo 5 sessions (1 week) of iTBS over the bilateral M1 (1 week), a 3-month washout period, and then 5 sessions (1 week) of sham stimulation. Motor evaluation will be performed at different follow-up visits along with a comprehensive neurocognitive assessment, evaluation of M1 excitability, combined structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and resting-state electroencephalography and functional MRI, and serum biomarker quantification of neuroaxonal damage, astrocytic reactivity, and neural plasticity prior to and after iTBS.
Discussion:
The findings of this study will help to update the efficiency of M1 iTBS for the treatment of PD and further provide specific neurobiological insights into improvements in motor and nonmotor symptoms in these patients. This novel project aims to yield more detailed structural and functional brain evaluations using a noninvasive approach, with the potential to identify prognostic neuroprotective biomarkers and elucidate structural and functional mechanisms of M1 iTBS-induced plasticity in cortico-basal ganglia circuitry. The current approach may significantly optimize neuromodulation paradigms to ensure state-of-the-art and scalable rehabilitative treatment to alleviate motor and nonmotor symptoms of PD.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cadiz, Spain, 11009
- Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosed with PD according to the UK Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank diagnostic criteria (UK PDSBB) diagnostic criteria
- Disease duration of at least 5 years to reduce the risk of including levodopa-responsive atypical Parkinsonism patients;
- Disease symptomatology in the ON medication state at a H&Y scale of II-III;
- Clinical and therapeutic stability in the last 2 months previous to the recruitment period; and
- Aged 45-75 years.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Lack of a PD diagnosis that meets the UK PDSBB diagnostic criteria
- Presence of a serious systemic disease
- Presence of severe or moderate cognitive impairment comparable to dementia, as revealed by an MMP score of ≤ 24
- Any incapacitating psychiatric or other clinical condition that might affect the correct performance of this protocol, such as any dystonia and/or dyskinesia
- Patients who received amantadine within the previous 60 days
- Any sign of atypical parkinsonism, neurological comorbidities, or history of cranioencephalic traumatism or epilepsy or any other contraindication for receiving neurostimulation with TMS (e.g., intracranial magnetic implant, cardiac pacemaker)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: real iTBS
Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) will be performed using a 3 pulse bursts at 50 Hz repeated every 200 ms and delivered as short trains of 10 bursts lasting 2 s and an intertrain silence period of 8 s, for a total of 600 pulses (20 cycles of trains) and a total duration of 190 s.
Intensity of iTBS will be administered to the bilateral M1 at 80% of the active motor threshold (aMT) of each patient.
|
Intermittent theta Burst stimulation will be performed as detailed in the Real arm description
Other Names:
|
|
Sham Comparator: sham iTBS
The repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) coil stimulation will be applied in the same position of the real stimulation.
Sham stimulation during treatment will follow the same procedure and both coils are identical in appearance and produce a similar sound and sensation, although the sham coil delivers no stimulation.
The patient will hear the same sound of real stimulation, which will be only functionally inactive but will be completely performed (for the whole time of duration of stimulation)
|
Intermittent theta Burst stimulation will be performed as detailed in the Real arm description
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical motor improvement
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to immediately after stimulation, after 1 week, after 2 weeks, and after 4 weeks.
|
Movement Disorders Society (MDS) Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III (MDS-UPDRS III).
Part III assessed the motor signs of PD and was administered by the rater (Range 0-132).
Part III contained 33 scores based on 18 items.
For each question a numeric score was assigned between 0-4, where 0 = Normal, 1 = Slight, 2 = Mild, 3 = Moderate, 4 = Severe.
|
Changes from baseline to immediately after stimulation, after 1 week, after 2 weeks, and after 4 weeks.
|
|
Changes on quality of life and motor complications
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to after stimulation.
|
MDS-UPDRS (parts II - IV).
Part II assessed motor experiences of daily living (Range 0-52).
Part IV assessed motor complications and contained 6 items.
Score range: 0-24, 4 and below is mild, 13 and above is severe
|
Changes from baseline to after stimulation.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to after stimulation
|
Change in Levodopa and Dopamine Equivalent Daily Dosages (LEDD).
The dosages of these medications are calculated using standardized conversion factors to obtain LEDD.
This outcome aims to measure any changes in the daily dosages of these medications over the course of the study or intervention.
|
Changes from baseline to after stimulation
|
|
Change in the Parkinson's Fatigue Scale (PFS-16)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to after stimulation
|
The PFS-16 is a 16-item patient-rated scale based on recent feelings and experiences over the past two weeks.
Nine items address the impact of fatigue on daily functioning and activities, including socialization and work but not exercise specifically and seven items tap the presence or absence of the subjective experience of fatigue with an emphasis on the physical effects of fatigue.
The scoring possibilities are 1 for "strongly disagree" and 5 for "strongly agree".
Based on the total of the scores, an ordinal PFS score ranging from 16 to 80 will be applied.
|
Changes from baseline to after stimulation
|
|
Change in quality of life measured with the Parkinson Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to after stimulation
|
Mobility impact as assessed by PDQ-39 mobility dimension (questions #1-10 from the total PDQ-39 questionnaire).
Scores are on a 0-4 Likert Scale (lower scores equaling better quality of life), summed, and then transformed into the total PDQ-39 that ranges from 0-100.
Lower scores represent better quality of life.
|
Changes from baseline to after stimulation
|
|
Screening of cognitive function by MMP
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 2 weeks after stimulation
|
Mini Mental Parkinson (MMP) is a brief questionnaire derived from the Mini Mental State Examination and used for the assessment of general cognitive function in PD patients.
This test is evaluated on a maximum of 32 points.
The presence of severe or moderate cognitive impairment comparable to dementia is indicated by a score of ≤ 24.
|
Changes from baseline to 2 weeks after stimulation
|
|
Screening of frontal lobe function related activities by Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to after stimulation
|
Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) is a short battery consisting of 6 subtests related to different frontal lobe functions.
The maximum score to be obtained in this test is 18 points.
To consider that the subject presents alterations in the frontal lobe and, therefore, altered executive functions, his score must be equal to or less than 11 points.
|
Changes from baseline to after stimulation
|
|
Screening of visuospatial memory by Benton Visual Retention Test (BVRT)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to after stimulation
|
Benton Visual Retention Test (BVRT) is a test used for the evaluation of visuospatial memory.
In our protocol, we plan to use the multiple choice format of administration, which consists of stimulus presentation followed by concealment for immediate recognition of one item out of four answer options (specifically, the M form).
The performance is scored 0-10 based on correct drawing reconstruction.
|
Changes from baseline to after stimulation
|
|
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 2 weeks after stimulation
|
In the BDI-II, a score of 0-13 indicates absence of depression, 14-19 mild depression, 20-28 moderate depression, and 29-63 severe depression.
|
Changes from baseline to 2 weeks after stimulation
|
|
Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 2 weeks after stimulation
|
In the HAM-A has a score range of 0 to 56, where higher scores are associated with higher severity anxiety.
|
Changes from baseline to 2 weeks after stimulation
|
|
Starkstein Apathy Scale (SAS)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 2 weeks after stimulation
|
The SAS has 14 items, rated on a 4-point scale with higher values indicating more apathy
|
Changes from baseline to 2 weeks after stimulation
|
|
Scale for the Evaluation of Neuropsychiatric Disorders in Parkinson's Disease (SEND-PD)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 2 weeks after stimulation
|
The SEND-PD is a 12-item scale divided into three subscales: psychotic symptoms, mood/apathy, and impulse control behaviors.
Items are rated from 0 (not present) to 4 (very severe)
|
Changes from baseline to 2 weeks after stimulation
|
|
Parkinson's Psychosis Questionnaire (PPQ)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 2 weeks after stimulation
|
The PPQ is a screening tool used to measure the frequency and severity of early signs and psychotic symptoms of PD and consists of six items, each rated from 1 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme symptoms); the total score ranges from 6 to 24 points.
|
Changes from baseline to 2 weeks after stimulation
|
|
Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (FrSBe)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 2 weeks after stimulation
|
The FrSBe is a self-report scale designed to assess the changes in behavior that may occur in relation to frontal system dysfunction.
Each item is rated on a 1-5 Likert scale.
Raw scores for the three subscales (Apathy, Disinhibition, and Executive Dysfunction) and the Total are reported as T scores.
|
Changes from baseline to 2 weeks after stimulation
|
|
Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's Disease (QUIP)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 2 weeks after stimulation
|
The QUIP is a screening questionnaire developed for the assessment of Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders (ICDs) and related behaviors.
It uses a 5-point Likert scale (score 0-4 for each question) to gauge the frequency of behaviors.
Scores for each ICDs and related disorder range from 0 to 16 and the total QUIP score for all ICDs and related disorders combined ranges from 0 to 112, with a higher score indicating greater severity (ie, frequency) of symptoms.
|
Changes from baseline to 2 weeks after stimulation
|
|
Center for Neurologic Study-Lability Scale (CNS-LS)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 2 weeks after stimulation
|
The CNS-LS is a screening instrument composed of seven items that are scored by the patient according to the perceived frequency of pseudobulbar affect (PBA) episodes during the last week.
A CNS-LS score of 13 or higher may suggest PBA.
|
Changes from baseline to 2 weeks after stimulation
|
|
Cortical excitability TMS-EMG measures
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to immediately after stimulation
|
The following transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-derived measures of cortical excitability using electromyography (EMG) parameters of cortical excitability will be obtained after stimulation of the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle hotspot of the mapping grid: the resting motor threshold (rMT); the active motor threshold (aMT); twenty single pulses ("20t"); and the cortical silent period (cSP)
|
Changes from baseline to immediately after stimulation
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Resting-state EEG activity
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 3 days after stimulation
|
Power spectral density (PSD) analysis of delta, theta, alpha, beta, gamma rhythms, and functional connectivity measures (e.g., coherence, synchronization measures from graph theory metrics) of EEG signal recorded during eyes-closed (4 min) and eyes-open (4 min) conditions
|
Changes from baseline to 3 days after stimulation
|
|
Structural MRI - T1-weighted (T13D)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 1 week after stimulation
|
Measures of global and regional gray matter (GM) volume and cortical thickness (CT) changes in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by voxel-based morphometry (VBM) measures
|
Changes from baseline to 1 week after stimulation
|
|
Resting-state functional fMRI
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 1 week after stimulation
|
Using baseline iTBS resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), altered brain networks associated with PD will be identified by independent component analysis (ICA) and Seed-to-voxel and seed-to-seed functional connectivity measures between patients and controls.
|
Changes from baseline to 1 week after stimulation
|
|
Serum protein quantification of Neurofilament light (NfL) protein
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 1 week after stimulation
|
Quantification of serum NfL levels by Single-molecule assay (Simoa; SR-X™ biomarker detection system)
|
Changes from baseline to 1 week after stimulation
|
|
Serum protein quantification of Glial Fibrillary Acid Protein (GFAP)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 2 weeks after stimulation
|
Quantification of serum GFAP levels by Single-molecule assay (Simoa; SR-X™ biomarker detection system)
|
Changes from baseline to 2 weeks after stimulation
|
|
Serum protein quantification of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline to 2 weeks after stimulation
|
Quantification of serum BDNF levels by Single-molecule assay (Simoa; SR-X™ biomarker detection system)
|
Changes from baseline to 2 weeks after stimulation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Javier J. Gonzalez-Rosa, PhD, University of Cadiz & Institute of Biomedical Research Cadiz (INiBICA)
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PD-iTBS-2169-N-19
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
The anonymized raw data analyzed in the present study are available on reasonable request to the corresponding author for purposes of replicating procedures and results.
The Results derived from the project will be published in clinical and neuroscience journals.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Parkinson's Disease
-
EicOsis Human Health Inc.University of California, Davis; Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's...RecruitingParkinson's Disease (PD)United States
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterNot yet recruitingParkinson's Disease (PD)United States
-
AbbVieRecruiting
-
University Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinUniversity of Kiel; University of Cologne; University Hospital, Bonn; Philipps...Not yet recruitingParkinson's Disease (PD)
-
InvicroMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCRecruitingParkinson's Disease | Parkinson's Disease (PD) | Parkinson's Disease (Disorder)United States
-
Ohio State UniversityCompletedParkinson's Disease | Parkinson Disease | Idiopathic Parkinson Disease | Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease | Parkinson Disease, Idiopathic | Parkinson's Disease, IdiopathicUnited States
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisFrance Parkinson AssociationUnknownHealthy Controls | Parkinson's Disease With LRRK2 Mutation | Parkinson's Disease Without LRRK2 MutationFrance
-
Guangzhou Henovcom Bioscience Co. Ltd.Frontage Clinical Services, Inc.Active, not recruitingParkinson's Disease (PD)United States
-
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfUniversity of TwenteRecruitingParkinson's Disease | Deep Brain StimulationGermany
-
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCCompletedParkinson Disease | Idiopathic Parkinson Disease | Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease
Clinical Trials on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
-
Xuzhou Central HospitalThe Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical UniversityNot yet recruitingFunctional Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Executive Function Disorder
-
Yanghua TianEnrolling by invitationInsomnia | Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) | Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)China
-
Al-Azhar UniversityCompleted
-
Guangzhou Psychiatric HospitalCompletedCognitive Impairment | Bipolar Disorder | RelapseChina
-
Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research HospitalCompletedFailed Back Surgery Syndrome
-
Veterans Medical Research FoundationUnited States Department of DefenseCompletedHeadache | Gulf War SyndromeUnited States
-
Universitat de LleidaNot yet recruitingCerebral Palsy, SpasticSpain
-
The University of Hong KongRecruitingCP (Cerebral Palsy)Hong Kong
-
The University of Hong KongNot yet recruiting
-
Aalborg UniversityCompletedAerobic Exercise | Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)Denmark