Electrolysis Technique vs Manual Therapy in Pelvic Pain

March 27, 2019 updated by: Carolina Walker Chao, Quirón Madrid University Hospital

Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis Technique vs. Manual Therapy in Women With Dyspareunia and Pelvic Pain

Pelvic floor muscle physical therapy is recommended in clinical guidelines for women dyspareunia and pelvic pain. This study compare pelvic floor manual therapy and intratissue percutaneous electrolysis (EPI) technique in the treatment of pelvic pain in women with dyspareunia. Half of participants will receive pelvic floor manual therapy while the other half will receive intratissue percutaneous electrolysis technique.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Dyspareunia is painful sexual intercourse and causes could be related to musculoskeletal pelvic floor muscles disorders (tenderness, trigger points, scars). There is evidence that manual therapy and intratissue percutaneous electrolysis can be effective for musculoskeletal pain disorders affecting muscles, tendons and fascias of the extremities but they have not been evaluated in pelvic floor muscle pain syndrome. The aim of this study is to compare manual therapy and EPI in the treatment of pelvic pain in women with dyspareunia.

Pelvic floor manual therapy is a clinical approach utilizing specifics hands-on mobilizing techniques to treat soft tissues. Pelvic floor mobilization is a slow controlled process of soft-tissue (myofascial) stretching intended to improve bio-mechanical elasticity.

EPI technique consists in an ultrasound-guided application of a galvanic electrolytic current that causes a controlled local inflammatory process in the target tissue. This allows for phagocytosis and the subsequent regeneration of the affected tissue.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain, 28223
        • Hospital Universitario Quiron Madrid

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • women with pain in the perineal area at an average intensity of 5 or more on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) during penetration or during pelvic examination, which is indicative of moderate to severe pain
  • At least three months postpartum or any gynecology surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • active urinary or vaginal infection
  • pelvic pathology associated with a lower genital pain problem (e.g. deep dyspareunia) and constant, spontaneous vulvar pain
  • younger than 18 or older than 65 years
  • previous interventions with steroid injections
  • fibromyalgia syndrome

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pelvic floor manual therapy group
Pelvic floor manual therapy is a clinical approach utilizing specifics hands-on mobilizing techniques to treat soft tissues. The technique require mobilization of soft-tissue by myofascial stretching maneuvers intended to improve bio-mechanical elasticity. The therapeutic protocol will be applied for 4 weeks.
Soft-tissue (myofascial) stretching techniques on pelvic floor muscles through external and internal (intra-vaginal) mobilizations. One weekly session for four weeks.
Other Names:
  • Man Ther Group
Experimental: Pelvic floor electrolysis group
Pelvic floor electrolysis technique consists in an ultrasound-guided application of a galvanic electrolytic current that causes a controlled local inflammatory process in the target tissue. This allows for phagocytosis and the subsequent regeneration of the affected tissue. The therapeutic protocol will be applied for 4 weeks.

An ultrasound-guided application of a galvanic electrolytic current with an acupuncture needle in the soft tissue of pelvic floor. EPI technique was applied using a specifically device (EPI-X Omega Advanced Medicine, Barcelona, Spain) which produces modulated galvanic electricity. This is applied using a modified electrosurgical scalpel that incorporates acupuncture needles (0.3 mm in diameter) of different lengths. The intensity can be adjusted by changing either the duration of stimulation or the output current (mA) of the device.

One weekly session for four weeks.

Other Names:
  • EPI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity before and after the intervention
Time Frame: Seven days after weekly session
Changes in pain intensity before and after the intervention. A 10-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) will be used to assess the patients' current level of perineal pain during the external and intra-vaginal examination.
Seven days after weekly session

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Female sexual function index
Time Frame: Seven days after the last session and three months later
Sexual function measure by the six-item Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI-6)
Seven days after the last session and three months later

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Carolina Walker, PT, PhD, Hospital Universitario Quiron Madrid

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 20, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 27, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

March 27, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 28, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Musculoskeletal Pain

Clinical Trials on Pelvic floor manual therapy group

3
Subscribe