Reducing Symptoms of Depression, Stress and Anxiety and Enhancing Positive Mental Health: a Randomized-controlled Study of the Positive Emotions Training

February 24, 2025 updated by: Lara Steinmann, Ruhr University of Bochum

Based on the results of the previously published paper "Positive Emotions Training (PoET) as an online intervention to improve mental health: a feasibility study" (Niemann et al., 2023) the goal of this study was to examine the effects of the "Positive Emotions Training" on mental health in a randomized-controlled study. Furthermore, possible predictors for the efficacy of PoET are to be explored.

Hypotheses:

  1. It was hypothesized that participants receiving PoET would show a significant increase in positive mental health factors at the second assessment point (T2) at end of the second training day.
  2. Furthermore, participants receiving PoET are to be expected to show a significant decrease in depression, anxiety and stress symptoms at T2.
  3. It was hypothesized that the changes in mental health factors remain stable up to the last assessment point (T3) three month after the training.
  4. Lastly, it was hypothesized that there would be no significant changes in the positive or negative mental health factors in the control group at T2 and T3.
  5. The possible predictors of the training's efficacy were not hypothesized, but examined in exploratory investigations.

Methods:

The final sample was n = 207 with n = 90 in the PoET group and n = 117 in the control. The control group did not receive any intervention in the experimental period, but was offered to participate in a later PoET. The allocation was randomized. Participants in the PoET group completed two online training sessions (3 hours each) via Zoom. Group size was about 25-30 people. The sessions included the following positive psychology constructs: happiness, humour, optimism, loving kindness and gratitude on the first day, and hope, self-efficacy, meaningfulness, forgiveness and resilience on the second day. All participants completed a questionnaire at the beginning of the first training session, at the end of the second one as well as three months after the second session. Participants were given an exercise booklet for all exercises (during the training sessions and at home). The one-week break between the two sessions was advertised as a "7-day-challenge" to improve the motivation in participants to exercise at home.

Data was collected pseudonymised via "qualtrics". Data analyses were conducted with RStudio. For the possible effects of PoET on mental health two-factorial repeated measures ANOVAs were conducted. For the exploration of possible predictors for the efficacy of the training, a hierarchical regression was conducted.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

297

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Rhine-Westphalia
      • Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, 44801
        • Ruhr-University Bochum

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • legal age (18), ability to use Zoom and all associated technology

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PoET group
Participants of this arm received the PoET online training within two sessions. They filled out a whole of three questionnaires.
Participants in the PoET group completed two online training sessions (3 hours each) via Zoom. Group size was about 25-30 people. The sessions included the following positive psychology constructs: happiness, humour, optimism, loving kindness and gratitude on the first day, and hope, self-efficacy, meaningfulness, forgiveness and resilience on the second day.
No Intervention: Control group
Participants did not receive any treatment initially, but were offered to participate in a later PoET training as compensation. They filled out a whole of three questionnaires.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Positive Mental Health Scale (PMH)
Time Frame: before 1st and after 2nd training session, three months after 2nd training session
9 items, 4-point-scale from 0 ("I do not agree ") to 3 ("I agree"), assessing emotional and psychological aspects of wellbeing, higher scores reflect better positive mental health
before 1st and after 2nd training session, three months after 2nd training session
Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21)
Time Frame: before 1st and after 2nd training session, three months after 2nd training session
21 items, 4-point-scale from 0 ("did not apply to me at all") to 3 ("applied to me very much or most of the time"), assessing negative emotional states, higher scores reflect more symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress
before 1st and after 2nd training session, three months after 2nd training session

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Life Orientation Test revised (LOT-r)
Time Frame: before 1st and after 2nd training session, three months after 2nd training session
10 items, 5-point-scale from 0 ("strongly disagree") to 4 ("strongly agree"), assessing dispositional optimism, higher scores reflect higher dispositional optimism
before 1st and after 2nd training session, three months after 2nd training session
Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)
Time Frame: before 1st and after 2nd training session, three months after 2nd training session
5 items, 7-point-scale from 1 ("strongly disagree") to 7 ("strongly agree"), assessing global subjective happiness, higher scores indicate a happier person
before 1st and after 2nd training session, three months after 2nd training session
Brief Resilience Scale (BRS)
Time Frame: before 1st and after 2nd training session, three months after 2nd training session
6 items, 5-point-scale from 1 ("strongly disagree") to 5 ("strongly agree"), assessing participants' ability to recover from stress despite significant adversity, higher scores reflect higher resilience
before 1st and after 2nd training session, three months after 2nd training session
Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ)
Time Frame: before 1st and after 2nd training session, three months after 2nd training session
20 items, 4-point-scale from 1 ("almost never") to 4 ("usually"), assessing the perceived stress in different areas of life, higher scores indicate more stress
before 1st and after 2nd training session, three months after 2nd training session
Satisfaction in different areas of life
Time Frame: before 1st and after 2nd training session, three months after 2nd training session
self-generated, five items, 4-point-scale from 1 ("not satisfied") to 4 ("satisfied"), assessing participants satisfaction in five different areas of life, higher scores reflecting higher satisfaction
before 1st and after 2nd training session, three months after 2nd training session
Implementation of at-home exercices
Time Frame: after 2nd training session and three months after 2nd training session
self-generated, two questions regarding the frequency and the kind of exercise participants did at home
after 2nd training session and three months after 2nd training session
Socio-demographic data
Time Frame: before 1st training session
age, gender, marital status, education, employment
before 1st training session

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Christina Bartnick (born Totzeck), PhD, Ruhr-University Bochum

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 3, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 4, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

May 4, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mental Health

Clinical Trials on PoET

Subscribe