Remote Ischemic Conditioning and Spinal Reflex Modulation

January 15, 2026 updated by: Swati Manoharrao Surkar, East Carolina University

Effects of Remote Ischemic Conditioning Combined With Motor Training on Spinal Reflex Modulation in Healthy Young Adults

Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a clinically feasible method that protects distant organs from severe injury through brief, sub lethal periods of ischemia followed by re-perfusion. Recent studies suggest that RIC, combined with training, improves muscle strength and balance in healthy adults and post-stroke survivors. While the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood, RIC's neuroprotective effects - such as promoting angiogenesis, neurogenesis, and modulating glutamate and GABA synthesis - overlap with neuroplasticity processes. Evidence indicates that neuroplasticity from exercise training occurs not only in the cerebral cortex but also within the spinal cord, yet the role of spinal reflex mechanisms underlying the benefits of RIC remains under explored. Therefore, this study aims to investigate effects of RIC on spinal reflex modulation in healthy adults, both independently and combined with balance training.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Ischemic conditioning (IC) is an endogenous phenomenon that protects target organs from severe ischemic events by applying alternating cycles of brief, sublethal ischemia followed by reperfusion. Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a more feasible, non-invasive method of delivering IC. It involves using a standard blood pressure cuff on either the arm or leg to induce brief periods of sublethal ischemia. Extensive evidence from both animal and human studies indicates that RIC provides neuroprotection through multifactorial mechanisms involving inflammatory, oxidative, excitotoxic, metabolic, vascular, and glial pathways. Additionally, several studies demonstrate the involvement of peripheral somatosensory, spinal cord, and autonomic pathways in RIC-induced neuroprotection. Prior research also shows that RIC enhances motor learning (balance performance) when paired with motor training in both young and older adults. While a wealth of research has shown that neuroplasticity in response to training occurs in cortical and spinal neural circuits, limited studies have explored the effects of RIC on spinal modulations in healthy adults. Notably, only one study has reported a reduction in Hoffman (H)-reflex amplitudes with RIC. Given the evidence of peripheral neuronal pathways involved in RIC and its positive impact on balance performance, it is plausible that RIC could lead to spinal reflex modulations and enhance balance improvements in healthy adults. These modulations may be further amplified when RIC is combined with balance training. The specific aims of this study are to determine whether 1) remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) combined with balance training modulates spinal reflex excitability, as reflected by H-reflex measures, and 2) to examine whether RIC combined with balance training leads to greater improvements in balance performance compared to sham conditioning combined with training in healthy adults. In this single-blind, randomized controlled trial, 30 healthy adults aged 18-40 years will undergo H-reflex testing of the dominant lower extremity and balance assessments at baseline (pre-training). Participants will then be randomized to receive either RIC or sham conditioning combined with a 5-day balance training program. RIC or sham conditioning will be delivered using cyclic inflation and deflation of a pressure cuff applied to the thigh of the dominant lower extremity following a standardized protocol. Balance training will consist of standing on a stability platform with the goal of maintaining the platform within a 5-degree horizontal range for 30 seconds across 15 trials per day for five consecutive days. All outcome measures, including H-reflex parameters (Hmax, maximal H-reflex amplitude, and Hmax/Mmax ratio) and balance performance, will be reassessed post-training following completion of the 5-day intervention. It is hypothesized that, compared to sham conditioning combined with balance training, RIC combined with balance training will result in greater reductions in H-reflex excitability and greater improvements in balance performance from baseline to post-training. This study will help clarify whether RIC induces alterations in spinal reflex modulations when applied independently or in combination with motor training, thereby reflecting neuroplasticity within the spinal cord in healthy young adults. These findings would deepen our understanding of the spinal mechanisms underlying the benefits of RIC and could accelerate its translation for individuals with neurological disorders

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Greenville, North Carolina, United States, 27858-6055
        • Swati Surkar

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy adults 18-40 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals with cognitive deficits or communication problems
  • Individuals with impaired vision
  • Individuals with balance disorders such as vestibular disorders, etc.
  • Individuals who are pregnant
  • Individuals with known cardiorespiratory dysfunctions
  • Presence of lower extremity condition, injury, or surgery within last three months which could compromise training

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC)
RIC is achieved via blood pressure cuff inflation to at least 20 mmHg above systolic blood pressure to 250 mmHg on the thigh of dominant LE. RIC involves 5 cycles of 5 minutes blood pressure cuff inflation followed by alternating 5 minutes of cuff deflation and requires 45 minutes. RIC is performed on visits 2 - 6.
See descriptions under arm/group descriptions. RIC is delivered for 5 intervention visits. Visits 1 is the baseline assessment visit, and visits 2-6 are RIC plus training visits.
All participants will undergo training on a balance board, learning to hold the board level within the 5- degree horizontal range. Participants perform the balance task for 15, 30-second trials per day at visits 2-6.
Sham Comparator: Sham conditioning
Sham conditioning is achieved via blood pressure cuff inflation to 25 mm Hg on the thigh of the dominant LE. Sham involves 5 cycles of 5 minutes blood pressure cuff inflation followed by alternating 5 minutes of cuff deflation and requires 45 minutes. Sham conditioning is performed on visits 2-6.
All participants will undergo training on a balance board, learning to hold the board level within the 5- degree horizontal range. Participants perform the balance task for 15, 30-second trials per day at visits 2-6.
See descriptions under arm/group descriptions. Sham conditioning is delivered for 5 intervention visits. Visits 1 is the baseline assessment visit, and visits 2-6 are Sham plus training visits.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in maximal H-reflex amplitude (Hmax)
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 7
The maximal (peak) H-reflex amplitude will be determined from the recruitment (stimulus-response) curve. The Hmax amplitude provides an estimate of the number or proportion of motor neurons (MNs) activated from the total MN pool, reflecting spinal reflex modulations and spinal neuroplasticity.
Baseline, Day 7
Change in Hmax/ Mmax Ratio
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 7
The maximal H-reflex and maximal M-wave amplitudes will be determined from the recruitment curve procedure. Calculating the Hmax/Mmax ratio is a standardization method used to reduce variability in H-reflex amplitude across participants. This provides a better basis for comparison and a more reliable estimate of changes in spinal reflex modulations between participants.
Baseline, Day 7

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Balance Performance
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 7
The average amount of time in seconds that a participant maintains the stability platform within ±5° of horizontal position during 15 trials of 30 seconds each. The total score will range between 0-30 seconds. Higher balance score indicates better balance performance. Greater average balance time indicates better balance performance.
Baseline, Day 7

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Swati M Surkar, PT, PhD, East Carolina University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 6, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 6, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UMCIRB 23-001021

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data will be shared on NIH figshare network and will be made available on request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After publishing the results of the study

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be made available upon request to the principal investigator.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy Young Adults

Clinical Trials on Remote Ischemic Condtioning (RIC)

Subscribe