- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06861933
The Effects of Scapulohumeral Rehabilitation on Scapula Kinematics and Upper Extremity Functionality in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease
September 3, 2025 updated by: Betül Söylemez, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University
The Effects of Scapulohumeral Rehabilitation on Scapula Kinematics and Upper Extremity Functionality in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease: A Single Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
With this study, individuals diagnosed with PD in Burdur province in Turkey will be provided with a physiotherapy and rehabilitation program for the upper extremity, and it is thought that the treatment received by both groups will have a positive effect on the functionality of the individuals.
According to the results of our study, it will be determined whether the scapula kinematics and upper extremity functionality of individuals diagnosed with PD are different from healthy individuals of the same age and gender.
After the intervention programs applied to the individuals, it is thought that it will contribute to the physiotherapy and rehabilitation programs of individuals with PD by determining whether the scapulohumeral rehabilitation program is superior to the upper extremity neurorehabilitation program.
Study Overview
Status
Active, not recruiting
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
28
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Burdur
-
Burdur, Burdur, Turkey (Türkiye), 15030
- Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University
-
-
Denizli
-
Denizli, Denizli, Turkey (Türkiye), 20200
- Pamukkale University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
For the intervention group:
- Having been diagnosed with Parkinson's Disease
- Being between 1-3 according to the Hoehn & Yahr staging
For the control group:
- Being of the same age and gender as the individuals diagnosed with Parkinson's disease included in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
For the intervention group:
- Refusing to participate in the study
- Having a full-thickness rotator cuff muscle rupture
- Having a history of humerus, clavicle, scapula or shoulder surgery
- Having a history of humerus, clavicle, scapula or shoulder fracture
- Having a history of any other disease that may affect the ability to stand independently
For the control group:
- Refusing to participate in the study
- Having a full-thickness rupture of the rotator cuff muscles
- Having a history of humerus, clavicle, scapula or shoulder surgery
- Having a history of humerus, clavicle, scapula or shoulder fracture
Study Exclusion Criteria for Volunteers:
- Failure to complete the tests included in the study
- Failure to comply with the study schedule, failure to complete sessions
- Incomplete data
- Failure to attend 3 consecutive sessions
- Voluntary withdrawal
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Group 1: Scapulohumeral Rehabilitation
The scapulohumeral rehabilitation group will receive 20 minutes of scapulohumeral exercises in addition to the 10-minute neurorehabilitation program.
Scapulohumeral Exercises: Scapular mobilization, scapular retraction, protraction, elevation in the scapular plane and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) exercises with the repeated contractions method.
The exercises will be applied according to the functional capacities of the individuals in the supine, sitting and standing positions with 10 repetitions at the beginning, without weights, using free weights and resistance bands, and the number of repetitions and sets will be progressed every week.
The intervention groups will receive a total of 21 treatment sessions, 3 days a week for 7 weeks.
|
It is reported in the literature that scapulohumeral rehabilitation applied in primary shoulder pathologies is effective.
In neurological diseases, a study was found in which scapulohumeral rehabilitation was applied to individuals diagnosed with stroke and reported that it was effective.
However, when the literature was examined, no study was found in which scapulohumeral rehabilitation was applied to individuals diagnosed with PD.
Therefore, our aim is to compare the effectiveness of the scapulohumeral rehabilitation program to be applied for shoulder dysfunction, which is thought to be one of the early findings in PD and is reported to be related to other main findings in PD, with the upper extremity neurorehabilitation program.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Group 2: Upper Extremity Neurorehabilitation
In addition to the 10-minute neurorehabilitation program, a 20-minute upper extremity neurorehabilitation exercises and a total of 30 minutes of physiotherapy and rehabilitation program will be applied.
Scapular retraction, protraction, elevation movements will be performed in the form of Wand exercises with the help of a stick or cane.
Exercises will be progressed by increasing the number of repetitions and sets in supine, sitting and standing positions according to the functional level of the participants.
The intervention groups will receive a total of 21 treatment sessions, 3 days a week for 7 weeks.
|
It is reported in the literature that scapulohumeral rehabilitation applied in primary shoulder pathologies is effective.
In neurological diseases, a study was found in which scapulohumeral rehabilitation was applied to individuals diagnosed with stroke and reported that it was effective.
However, when the literature was examined, no study was found in which scapulohumeral rehabilitation was applied to individuals diagnosed with PD.
Therefore, our aim is to compare the effectiveness of the scapulohumeral rehabilitation program to be applied for shoulder dysfunction, which is thought to be one of the early findings in PD and is reported to be related to other main findings in PD, with the upper extremity neurorehabilitation program.
Other Names:
|
|
No Intervention: Control Group
The control group will consist of healthy volunteers of the same age and gender as individuals diagnosed with Parkinson's disease (PD).
The control group will not receive any physiotherapy or rehabilitation program and will only receive relevant assessments to compare with the results of individuals with PD.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Scapular Index
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 7 weeks
|
It is calculated with the formula (distance between sternal notch - coracoid process / posterolateral angle of acromion - horizontal distance between thoracic spine) x 100.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 7 weeks
|
|
Pectoralis Minor Index
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 7 weeks
|
It is calculated with the formula Pectoralis Minor Index = (Pectoralis Minor Length / Participant's height) x 100.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 7 weeks
|
|
Lateral Scapular Slide Test
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 7 weeks
|
In the Lateral Scapular Slide Test, the distance to the thoracic spinous process corresponding to the inferior angle of the scapula is measured in three different positions: arms relaxed at the sides, hands on the iliac crest, and arm in 90-degree shoulder abduction and full internal rotation.
The distances between the two sides are compared.
A difference of more than 1.5 cm between the two sides is considered asymmetric.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 7 weeks
|
|
Box and Block Test
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 7 weeks
|
150 small wooden cubes are filled from the box where the patient's hand is to be tested to the box next to it.
The patient is asked to throw one cube at a time into the empty box next to it.
The number of cubes thrown in 60 seconds is counted.
The result gives the score.
The test is repeated for both hands.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 7 weeks
|
|
Upper Extremity Functional Index
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 7 weeks
|
It is a scale developed by Stratford et al. in 2001 and consists of twenty activity questions.
The person scores between 0-4 according to the difficulty of doing the activity.
The lowest score in total is 0, the highest score is 80.
Low scores indicate that the person has difficulty doing the activity due to the condition of the upper extremity.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 7 weeks
|
|
Ultrasound
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 7 weeks
|
During the evaluation, the patient will be in a sitting position, with the arm next to the body, the forearm in supination and the elbow in full extension.
Supraspinatus muscle thickness measurement will be performed by positioning the probe on the fossa supraspinata of the scapula, perpendicular to the skin, along the muscle fibers.
The hyperechogenic bone cortex of the fossa supraspinata will be accepted as the landmark.
When the muscle fibers are visualized, the thickness of the supraspinatus muscle will be measured from the level where the muscle is observed to be thickest.
For the infraspinatus muscle thickness measurement, the hyperechogenic bone cortex of the fossa infraspinata of the scapula will be accepted as the landmark, and the probe will be placed perpendicular to the skin, along the muscle fibers.
After the muscle fibers are visualized, the thickness of the infraspinatus muscle will be measured from the level where the muscle is observed to be thickest.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 7 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 7 weeks
|
VAS is a 10-centimeter (cm) scale where 0 is defined as "no pain" and 10 is defined as "unbearable pain".
It is a valid and reliable method for assessing the severity of musculoskeletal pain and is frequently used in clinical studies.
In a study conducted on patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, VAS values less than 3.4 cm were classified as mild pain, VAS values between 3.5 and 7.4 cm were classified as moderate pain, and VAS values greater than 7.5 cm were classified as severe pain.
The participants' pain severity will be assessed with VAS for resting and activity conditions.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 7 weeks
|
|
King's Parkinson's Pain Scale
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 7 weeks
|
Consists of 14 items divided into seven different areas.
Each item is scored by multiplying the severity (0 [no pain] 3 [very severe pain]) (0 [never] 4 [always]).
The areas and score ranges are: musculoskeletal pain (0-12 points); chronic pain (0-24 points); pain associated with fluctuation (0-36 points); night pain (0-24 points); orofacial pain (0-36 points); color change, edema (0-24 points); radicular pain (0-12 points).
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 7 weeks
|
|
Range of Motion
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 7 weeks
|
Participants' shoulder flexion, abduction, internal and external rotation movements will be evaluated with a manual goniometer.
The angle at which shoulder pain develops in active and passive movements will be recorded.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 7 weeks
|
|
Scapula Angles
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 7 weeks
|
The scapula will be evaluated with the inclinometer in three different positions: at rest, with the shoulder at 45 degrees of flexion and 90 degrees of flexion.
The difference between the right and left sides will be compared.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 7 weeks
|
|
New York Posture Rating Chart
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 7 weeks
|
Postural changes in 13 different body segments based on observation are scored as 1 point (marked deviation), 3 points (slight deviation), or 5 points (correct posture).
The total score ranges from 13 to 65 points, with higher scores indicating correct/normal postural alignment.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 7 weeks
|
|
PostureScreen Mobile Smartphone Application
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 7 weeks
|
It is an image-based method that takes photographs of individuals in the sagittal and frontal planes.
The application calculates postural variables using the individual's anatomical points that are digitally marked depending on the number of variables of interest.
This process of digitally marking the points consists of drawing the boundaries of anatomical reference points (pelvic iliac crests, greater trochanter, femoral condyle, and ear lobule) directly on the mobile device screen.
Body angles are then calculated.
As a result, it provides an output file containing the values of the postural variables and images showing the digitized points and their positions relative to a neutral posture.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 7 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Chaudhuri KR, Rizos A, Trenkwalder C, Rascol O, Pal S, Martino D, Carroll C, Paviour D, Falup-Pecurariu C, Kessel B, Silverdale M, Todorova A, Sauerbier A, Odin P, Antonini A, Martinez-Martin P; EUROPAR and the IPMDS Non Motor PD Study Group. King's Parkinson's disease pain scale, the first scale for pain in PD: An international validation. Mov Disord. 2015 Oct;30(12):1623-31. doi: 10.1002/mds.26270. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
- Boonstra AM, Schiphorst Preuper HR, Reneman MF, Posthumus JB, Stewart RE. Reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale for disability in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Int J Rehabil Res. 2008 Jun;31(2):165-9. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3282fc0f93.
- Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 1985 Jun;39(6):386-91. doi: 10.5014/ajot.39.6.386.
- Boonstra AM, Schiphorst Preuper HR, Balk GA, Stewart RE. Cut-off points for mild, moderate, and severe pain on the visual analogue scale for pain in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Pain. 2014 Dec;155(12):2545-2550. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.09.014. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
- Borstad JD, Ludewig PM. The effect of long versus short pectoralis minor resting length on scapular kinematics in healthy individuals. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005 Apr;35(4):227-38. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2005.35.4.227.
- Aytar A, Yuruk ZO, Tuzun EH, Baltaci G, Karatas M, Eker L. The Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI): cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2015;28(3):489-95. doi: 10.3233/BMR-140545.
- Aktas I, Unlu Ozkan F. Pectoralis minor syndrome. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Nov 22;68(4):447-455. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2023.12037. eCollection 2022 Dec.
- Yu IY, Choo YK, Kim MH, Oh JS. The effects of pressure biofeedback training on infraspinatus muscle activity and muscle thickness. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2018 Apr;39:81-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2018.01.007. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
- Boehm TD, Kirschner S, Mueller T, Sauer U, Gohlke FE. Dynamic ultrasonography of rotator cuff muscles. J Clin Ultrasound. 2005 Jun;33(5):207-13. doi: 10.1002/jcu.20124.
- Kretic D, Turk T, Rotim T, Saric G. Reliability of Ultrasound Measurement of Muscle Thickness in Patients with Supraspinatus Tendon Pathology. Acta Clin Croat. 2018 Jun;57(2):335-341. doi: 10.20471/acc.2018.57.02.15.
- Moreira R, Teles A, Fialho R et al. Mobile Applications for Assessing Human Posture: A Systematic Literature Review. Electronics. 2020; (8):1196. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9081196
- McRoberts LB, Cloud RM, Black CM. Evaluation of the New York Posture Rating Chart for assessing changes in postural alignment in a garment study. Cloth Text Res J 2013;31:81-96. DOI: 10.1177/0887302X13480558
- Shadmehr A, Azarsa MH, Jalaie S. Inter- and intrarater reliability of modified lateral scapular slide test in healthy athletic men. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:384149. doi: 10.1155/2014/384149. Epub 2014 May 13.
- Borstad JD. Resting position variables at the shoulder: evidence to support a posture-impairment association. Phys Ther. 2006 Apr;86(4):549-57.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
April 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 26, 2025
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 5, 2025
First Posted (Actual)
March 6, 2025
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
September 10, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 3, 2025
Last Verified
September 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Synucleinopathies
- Brain Diseases
- Central Nervous System Diseases
- Nervous System Diseases
- Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Movement Disorders
- Parkinsonian Disorders
- Basal Ganglia Diseases
- Parkinson Disease
- Therapeutics
- Patient Care
- Health Services
- Health Care Facilities Workforce and Services
- Aftercare
- Continuity of Patient Care
- Rehabilitation
- Physical Therapy Modalities
- Neurological Rehabilitation
Other Study ID Numbers
- E-60116787-020-491421
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Parkinson's Disease (PD)
-
EicOsis Human Health Inc.University of California, Davis; Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's...RecruitingParkinson's Disease (PD)United States
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterNot yet recruitingParkinson's Disease (PD)United States
-
University Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinUniversity of Kiel; University of Cologne; University Hospital, Bonn; Philipps...Not yet recruitingParkinson's Disease (PD)
-
Guangzhou Henovcom Bioscience Co. Ltd.Frontage Clinical Services, Inc.Active, not recruitingParkinson's Disease (PD)United States
-
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfUniversity of Oxford; University of TwenteRecruitingDeep Brain Stimulation | Parkinson's Disease (PD)Germany
-
Ege UniversityCompletedDysphagia | Parkinson's Disease (PD)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
University of FloridaCompletedParkinson Disease (PD)United States
-
Riphah International UniversityNot yet recruitingParkinson's Disease (PD)Pakistan
-
Zhang JianguoNot yet recruitingPD - Parkinson's DiseaseChina
-
Fujita Health UniversityRecruitingParkinson's Disease (PD)Japan
Clinical Trials on Physiotherapy and rehabilitation
-
Hospital Clinic of BarcelonaSociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía TorácicaUnknownNon-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis
-
Marmara UniversityCompletedPain | Surgery | Pulmonary Function | Functional Capacity | Thoracic
-
University of MalagaUnknownSpasticity, Muscle
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint EtienneCompleted
-
Istanbul Medipol University HospitalCompletedCoronary Artery Disease | Exercise AddictionTurkey
-
Melek Volkan YaziciCompleted
-
Muğla Sıtkı Koçman UniversityCompletedRehabilitation | Knee ArthroplastyTurkey
-
Centre Epaule Coude CEPCOGregory Cunningham; Alexandre Laedermann; Benoît Borner; Yannick Thilby; Suzanne...RecruitingShoulder Instability | Shoulder DislocationSwitzerland
-
The University of Hong KongThe Queen Elizabeth HospitalCompletedNon Specific Chronic Low Back PainChina
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalCompleted