Expanded Indications of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer in China

March 10, 2025 updated by: Beijing Friendship Hospital

Expanded Indications of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer in China: a Multicenter, Ambispective, Observational, Open-cohort Study

Background: The main treatment methods for early gastric cancer (EGC) include endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and radical gastrectomy. However, appropriate treatment for patients who exceed the absolute indications for ESD remains unestablished. In China, evidence-based medicine for the expanding indications of ESD and accurate diagnostic staging for EGC patients are lacking. Thus, clinical studies involving Chinese patients with EGC are necessary to select appropriate treatment options and promote China's expanded indications for ESD and diagnostic staging scheme.

Methods: This is a multicenter, ambispective, observational, open-cohort study that is expected to enroll 554 patients with EGC. The study was launched in May 2018 and is scheduled to end in March 2022. All enrolled patients should meet the inclusion criteria. Case report forms and electronic data capture systems are used to obtain clinical data, which includes demographic information, results of perioperative blood- and auxiliary examinations, surgical information, results of postoperative pathology, and the outcomes of postoperative recovery and follow-up. Patients are followed up every 6 months after surgery for a minimum of 5 years. The primary endpoint is the rate of lymph node metastasis (LNM), whereas the secondary endpoints include the following: consistency, sensitivity, and specificity of the results of preoperative examinations and postoperative pathology cut off values for LNM; logistic regression model of expanded indications for ESD; and incidence of postoperative complications within the 30-day and 5-year relapse-free survival rates.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study will explore and evaluate expanded indications for ESD that match the characteristics of the Chinese population in patients with EGC and will introduce a related staging procedure and examination scheme that is appropriate for China. Ethical approval was obtained from all participating centers. The findings are expected to be disseminated through publications or presentations and will facilitate clinical decision-making in EGC.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1291

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100050
        • Beijing Friendship Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This study aims to explore and evaluate expanded indications for ESD that match the characteristics of the Chinese population in patients with EGC, and to introduce a staging procedure and examination scheme for EGC that is appropriate for China.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients aged 18-75 years (regardless of sex). Patients with tumor diameter > 30 mm, ulceration (UL)(+), and differentiated mucosal carcinoma (T1a).

Patients with tumor diameter > 30 mm and differentiated, submucosal invasion depth < 500 μm (T1b SM1).

Patients with tumor diameter ≤ 30 mm and differentiated submucosal carcinoma (T1b).

Patients with tumor diameter ≤ 20 mm, UL(-), and undifferentiated (T1a). Patients with tumor diameter > 20 mm, UL(-), and undifferentiated (T1a). Patients with tumor diameter ≤ 30 mm, UL(+), and undifferentiated (T1a). Patients with tumor diameter > 30 mm, UL(+), and undifferentiated (T1a).

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients with gastric stump cancer. Patients with recurrent gastric cancer. Patients with multiple primary malignant tumors.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
D2 gastrectomy
Under the requirement of the guideline for laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer (2016 edition), laparoscopic radical gastrectomy is performed in patients.
Under the requirement of the guideline for laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer (2016 edition), laparoscopic radical gastrectomy is performed in patients.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Rate of lymph node metastasis
Time Frame: periprocedurally
periprocedurally

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity of gold standards
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 year
Postoperative histopathology of ultrasonic gastroscopy for tumor invasion depth, abdominal and pelvic enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan for LNM, pathological biopsy for tumor differentiation, and auxiliary examination for TNM staging.
through study completion, an average of 5 year
Logistic regression model
Time Frame: Periprocedural
To explore the corresponding logistic regression model, postoperative histopathological examination for LNM, depth of infiltration, and degree of differentiation are evaluated in the univariate analysis. Variables with statistical significance in the univariate analysis are examined in the multivariate analysis.
Periprocedural
Complications
Time Frame: Periprocedural
Postoperative complications classified as higher than Grade II
Periprocedural
Five-year relapse-free survival rate
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 year
The time interval from the date of operation to the detection of tumor recurrence within 5 years is recorded.
through study completion, an average of 5 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

January 11, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastric Cancer Stage

Clinical Trials on D2 gastrectomy

Subscribe