Closed-Loop Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation for the Treatment of Depression (CLACS)

Closed-Loop Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation for the Treatment of Depression (CLACS): Single-Site Open-Label Pilot Study

The purpose of this research study is to study closed-loop transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) to determine its effects on symptoms of depression in people with major depressive disorder.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The purpose of this clinical trial is to investigate the preliminary efficacy of closed-loop tACS for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) in an open-label pilot study. We will recruit up to 35 participants with unipolar, non-psychotic MDD. Participation will include seven visits, two of them remotely (with an in-person option as needed), and one electronic survey.

Potential participants fill-in an electronic pre-screening form. If potentially eligible, a remote screening visit is performed. If eligible, participants attend five consecutive, daily stimulation sessions. Clinical assessments will be performed at baseline (Day 1 of stimulation, D1), Day five of stimulation (D5), and at their follow-up visit (14 days after the completion of stimulation, FU2) using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17).

For a subset of patients, electroencephalography (EEG) is collected at D1 prior to stimulation and after stimulation and again at FU2.

For a subset of patients, self-scoring surveys will be sent bi-weekly until 12 weeks after treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27516
        • Carolina Center for Neurostimulation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ages 18-70 years
  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 5th Edition (DSM-5) diagnosis of MDD; unipolar, non-psychotic
  • Hamilton Rating Depression Rating Scale (HRDS-17) score >8
  • Low suicide risk as determined by the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) triage form (no intent or plan)
  • Capacity to understand all relevant risks and potential benefits of the study (informed consent)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • DSM-5 diagnosis of severe alcohol use disorder (AUD) within the last 12 months.
  • DSM-5 diagnosis of moderate to severe substance use disorder (excluding tobacco) within the last 12 months.
  • Lifetime history of bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder, schizophrenia, autism
  • Current use of benzodiazepines > 20mg diazepam/d equivalent
  • Antidepressant dose change within the last 2 weeks
  • Initiated new antidepressant within the last 4 weeks

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Closed-loop tACS
Closed-loop individual alpha tACS daily for five consecutive days.
Individual alpha tACS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item (HDRS-17)
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 19 (i.e. 19 days)
Change in HDRS-17 from Day 1 (D1) to Day 19 (i.e., two week follow-up; FU2); HDRS-17 minimum value is 0, maximum value is 52. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Negative scores indicate improved outcomes.
Day 1 to Day 19 (i.e. 19 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item (HDRS-17)
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 5 (i.e., 5 days)
Change in HDRS-17 from Day 1 (D1) to Day 5 (D5); HDRS-17minimum value is 0, maximum value is 52. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Negative scores indicate improved outcomes.
Day 1 to Day 5 (i.e., 5 days)
Response/Remission of Depression
Time Frame: Day 5 and Day 19
Number of response/remission rates at Day 5 (D5) and Day 19 (i.e., two week follow-up; FU2). Response defined as >=50% reduction in HDRS-17 from D1. Remission defined as HDRS-17 score <=7.
Day 5 and Day 19
Change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS)
Time Frame: Day 1 (D1) to Day 5 (D5); D1 to Day 12 (FU1); and D1 to Day 19 (FU2)
Change in QIDS at Day 5 (D5), Day 12 (i.e., one-week follow-up; FU1), and Day 19 (i.e., two-week follow-up; FU2); QIDS minimum value is 0, maximum value is 27. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Negative scores indicate improved outcome.
Day 1 (D1) to Day 5 (D5); D1 to Day 12 (FU1); and D1 to Day 19 (FU2)
Change in Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale (ASRM)
Time Frame: Day 1 (D1) to Day 5 (D5); D1 to Day 12 (FU1); and D1 to Day 19 (FU2)
Change in ASRM at Day 5 (D5), Day 12 (i.e., one week follow-up; FU1), and Day 19 (i.e., two week follow-up; FU2); ASRM minimum value is 0, maximum value is 20. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Negative scores indicate improved outcome.
Day 1 (D1) to Day 5 (D5); D1 to Day 12 (FU1); and D1 to Day 19 (FU2)
Change in Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS)
Time Frame: Day 1 (D1) to Day 5 (D5); D1 to Day 12 (FU1); and D1 to Day 19 (FU2)
Change in SHAPS from Day 1 (D1) to Day 5 (D5), Day 12 (i.e., one week follow-up; FU1), and Day 19 (i.e., two week follow-up; FU2); SHAPS minimum value is 0, maximum value is 14. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Negative scores indicate improved outcome.
Day 1 (D1) to Day 5 (D5); D1 to Day 12 (FU1); and D1 to Day 19 (FU2)
Change in Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-42)
Time Frame: Day 1 (D1) to Day 5 (D5); D1 to Day 12 (FU1); and D1 to Day 19 (FU2)
Change in DASS-42 from Day 1 (D1) to Day 5 (D5), Day 12 (i.e., one week follow-up; FU1), and Day 19 (i.e., two week follow-up; FU2); DASS-42 minimum value is 0, maximum value is 126 with three subscales (0 to 42). Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Negative scores indicate improved outcome.
Day 1 (D1) to Day 5 (D5); D1 to Day 12 (FU1); and D1 to Day 19 (FU2)
Change in State-Train Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Time Frame: Day 1 (D1) to Day 5 (D5); D1 to Day 12 (FU1); and D1 to Day 19 (FU2)
Change in STAI from Day 1 (D1) to Day 5 (D5), Day 12 (one week follow-up; FU1), and Day 19 (two week follow-up; FU2); STAI minimum value is 20, maximum value is 80. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Negative scores indicate improved outcome.
Day 1 (D1) to Day 5 (D5); D1 to Day 12 (FU1); and D1 to Day 19 (FU2)
Change in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire, Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF)
Time Frame: Day 1 (D1) to Day 5 (D5); D1 to Day 12 (FU1); and D1 to Day 19 (FU2)
Change in Q-LES-Q-SF from Day 1 (D1) to Day 5 (D5), Day 12 (i.e., one week follow-up; FU1), and Day 19 (i.e., two week follow-up; FU2); Q-LES-Q-SF minimum value is 14, maximum value is 70. Higher scores indicate better outcome. Negative scores indicate worse outcome.
Day 1 (D1) to Day 5 (D5); D1 to Day 12 (FU1); and D1 to Day 19 (FU2)
Change in Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI)
Time Frame: Severity: {Day 1 (D1), Day 5 (D5) and Day 19 (FU2)}; Global Improvement: {Day 5 (D5) and Day 19 (FU2)}
Change in CGI from Day 1 (D1) to Day 5 (D5) and Day 19 (i.e., two week follow-up; FU2); CGI scale contains two scoring components, 1) Severity of Illness (0-7) and 2) Global Improvement (0-7). Higher scores in component 1 indicate worse symptoms while higher numbers in component 2 indicate worse clinical outcomes.
Severity: {Day 1 (D1), Day 5 (D5) and Day 19 (FU2)}; Global Improvement: {Day 5 (D5) and Day 19 (FU2)}

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Alpha Oscillation Power
Time Frame: 19 days
Change in EEG alpha oscillation power at D1 pre-stimulation, D1 post-stimulation, and FU2.
19 days
Change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) Over 12 Weeks
Time Frame: 89 days
Change in QIDS at four week follow-up (FU3), six week follow-up (FU4), eight week follow-up (FU5), ten week follow-up (FU6), and twelve week follow-up (FU7); minimum value is 0, maximum value is 27. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
89 days
Change in Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale (ASRM) Over 12 Weeks
Time Frame: 89 days
Change in ASRM at FU3, FU4, FU5, FU6, and FU7; minimum value is 0, maximum value is 20. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
89 days
Change in Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) Over 12 Weeks
Time Frame: 89 days
Change in SHAPS at FU3, FU4, FU5, FU6, and FU7; minimum value is 0, maximum value is 14. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
89 days
Change in Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-42) Over 12 Weeks
Time Frame: 89 days
Change in DASS-42 at FU3, FU4, FU5, FU6, and FU7; minimum value is 0, maximum value is 126 with three subscales (0 to 42). Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
89 days
Change in State-Train Anxiety Inventory (STAI) Over 12 Weeks
Time Frame: 89 days
Change in STAI at FU3, FU4, FU5, FU6, and FU7; minimum value is 20, maximum value is 80. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
89 days
Change in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire, Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF)
Time Frame: 89 days
Change in Q-LES-Q-SF at FU3, FU4, FU5, FU6, and FU7; minimum value is 14, maximum value is 70. Higher scores indicate better outcome.
89 days
HDRS-17 Change
Time Frame: 47 Days
Change in HDRS-17 between six week follow up (FU4) and D1
47 Days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David R Rubinow, MD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 13, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 22, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

August 19, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Closed-loop tACS

Subscribe