Semi-closed Loop Automated Insulin Therapy in the Pediatric Population Aged 2-6 Years With Type 1 Diabetes: Impact on Quality of Life and Glycemic Control (Diablife)

April 16, 2025 updated by: Fondation Lenval

The incidence of type 1 diabetes is increasing, with an incidence of +4% per year in France today.

The treatment for type 1 diabetes is insulin therapy. In recent years, new systems have emerged, so-called "semi-closed loop" systems, also called automated insulin therapy, which have proven their superiority in terms of quality of life and glycemic balance in adults and children over 6 years old.

Since January 24, 2024, the HAS now recognizes the indication of the semi-closed loop for the YPSOPUMP model in children aged 2 to 6 years. This is the first reimbursement in France of a closed loop system for the 2-6 year old age group. There are currently few studies comparing the quality of life of children in semi-closed loop versus other treatments (open loop or injections). Regarding quality of life, the studies found mainly concern the contribution for parents and the improvement of adolescents' sleep as in the study by Erin C Cobry et al from 2020 (6).

Our study therefore aims to demonstrate an improvement in quality of life but also in diabetes balance in type 1 diabetic patients on a closed loop insulin pump versus open loop or injections in the pediatric population aged 2-6 years.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Nice, France, 06000
        • Recruiting
        • Fondation Lenval Hôpitaux pédiatrique Nice CHU Lenval

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Type 1 Diabetic children aged 2 to 6 years treated with a semi-closed loop insulin pump at the Nice pediatric hospital

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • -Patients aged 2 to 6 years inclusive
  • Presenting type 1 diabetes on insulin therapy
  • Social security affiliates
  • Patient initiating semi-closed loop treatment
  • Family (at least one parent or representative of parental authority) agreeing to follow the training necessary for continuous measurement of glucose in real time.
  • collection of non-opposition from one of the two parents or the representative of parental authority agreement

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Opposition to participation in research involving humans or opposition to the use of data or samples and associated data (withdrawal of non-opposition).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Study of the quality of life of diabetic children closed loop treatment versus other insulin therapy
Study of the quality of life of T1D children aged 2 to 6 years inclusive treated with a semi-closed loop insulin pump versus other types of insulin therapy. Each patient will be it's one controle.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
An improvement in the score on the general quality of life questionnaire in pediatrics PedsQL 4.0 which will be evaluated before the implementation of the semi-closed loop, at 1 month and 6 months after the implementation of the semi-closed loop.
Time Frame: the assessment of quality of life via the PedsQL 4.0 questionnaire will be evaluated before the implementation of the semi-closed loop, at 1 month and 6 months after the implementation of the semi-closed loop.

The quality of life questionnaire includes 4 categories of questions regarding the last month: 1 category on physical capacity problems, 1 category on emotional state problems, 1 category on problems relating to others, and 1 category on problems with the community.

Each category is rated from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). The quality of life questionnaire intended for children aged 5 to 6 years concerns the last 7 days. The response is rated using a face scale (3 different faces) corresponding to the rating 0 (never), 2 (sometimes) and 4 (almost always).

The overall quality of life of the diabetic child corresponds to the combined score of all the questions. The score range is 0 to 92, with lower scores indicating better quality of life.

the assessment of quality of life via the PedsQL 4.0 questionnaire will be evaluated before the implementation of the semi-closed loop, at 1 month and 6 months after the implementation of the semi-closed loop.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare the glycemic balance of patients on automated insulin therapy versus other treatments (open loop or injections) via TIR (time in range or time within the target).
Time Frame: The evaluation of the secondary criteria is carried out before the implementation of the semi-closed loop, then at 1 month and 6 months after implementation.
Evolution of TIR (time in range or time in the target) when switching to semi-closed loop versus open loop.
The evaluation of the secondary criteria is carried out before the implementation of the semi-closed loop, then at 1 month and 6 months after implementation.
Compare the glycemic balance of patients on automated insulin therapy versus other treatments (open loop or injections) via HbA1c.
Time Frame: The evaluation of the secondary criteria is carried out before the implementation of the semi-closed loop, then at 1 month and 6 months after implementation.
Evolution of HbA1c during the transition to semi-closed loop versus open loop.
The evaluation of the secondary criteria is carried out before the implementation of the semi-closed loop, then at 1 month and 6 months after implementation.
Compare the number of hypoglycemic episodes
Time Frame: The evaluation of the secondary criteria is carried out before the implementation of the semi-closed loop, then at 1 month and 6 months after implementation.
Evolution of TUR (time spent in hypoglycemia) when switching to semi-closed loop versus open loop.
The evaluation of the secondary criteria is carried out before the implementation of the semi-closed loop, then at 1 month and 6 months after implementation.
Compare time in hyperglycemia
Time Frame: The evaluation of the secondary criteria is carried out before the implementation of the semi-closed loop, then at 1 month and 6 months after implementation.
Evolution of TAR (time spent in hyperglycemia) when switching to semi-closed loop versus open loop
The evaluation of the secondary criteria is carried out before the implementation of the semi-closed loop, then at 1 month and 6 months after implementation.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Céline Gouillard-Darnaud, MD, Fondation Lenval

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 17, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 4, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Subscribe