High-Tech Rehabilitation Pathway for Chronic Adult Neuromuscular Diseases - Fit4MedRob-Chronic MND Project (Fit4MR-ChrMND)

Clinical Protocol for a Pragmatic Trial on a High-Tech Rehabilitation Pathway for Chronic Adult Neuromuscular Diseases (Fit4MedRob-Chronic MND Project)

The primary objective is to demonstrate, in a population of chronic neuromuscular disease the non-inferiority of a rehabilitation treatment integrated with robotic and/or technological devices compared to traditional rehabilitation treatment in the level of fatigue.

The main question it aims to answer is:

Are high-tech rehabilitation interventions, including robotic systems, virtual reality, and stabilometric platforms, not inferior to traditional rehabilitation methods in improving balance, motor function, fatigue levels, sarcopenia, cognitive engagement, and overall quality of life in patients with chronic neuromuscular diseases (NMDs)? Researchers will compare a robotic treatment group, that consists in an high-tech rehabilitation, with a control group, that will receive the traditional rehabilitative treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a novel rehabilitation protocol integrating advanced technologies in the treatment of chronic neuromuscular diseases (NMDs).

Background: NMDs affect muscle function and are directly controlled by the nervous system. Traditional rehabilitation often falls short in addressing the multifaceted needs of NMD patients. This gap underscores the necessity for innovative rehabilitation approaches that can significantly enhance the quality of life and optimize recovery outcomes following acute events.

Methods: The protocol integrates advanced technologies to address the rehabilitation needs of patients with chronic NMDs. It utilizes robotic systems to ensure consistent and precise movement, virtual reality for immersive and engaging therapy, and stabilometric platforms to enhance balance training. The focus is on chronic NMDs such as Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIPD) and Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy (CMT). The approach emphasizes rapid rehabilitation to maximize recovery outcomes.

Study Design: An interventional, randomized, pragmatic trial with a parallel assignment. The trial aims to compare the efficacy of high-tech rehabilitation methods against conventional treatments in improving patient outcomes.

Outcome Measures: To assess the improvement of at least 10 points in balance measured using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) from baseline to the end of the treatment period comparing the high-tech rehabilitation circuit with standard rehabilitation protocol. Conclusion: This protocol seeks to determine if high-tech rehabilitation interventions can outperform traditional methods in chronic NMDs. By doing so, it aims to potentially establish a new global standard for the care of patients with NMD care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Genova, Italy, 16132
        • Not yet recruiting
        • IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino - Genova
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Angelo Schenone, MD
        • Contact:
      • Milano, Italy, 20138
      • Modena, Italy, 41126
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jessica Mandrioli, MD
      • Montescano, Italy, 27040
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Cira Fundarò, MD
      • Pavia, Italy, 27100
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Antonio Nardone, MD
      • Roma, Italy, 00135
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Irene Aprile, MD
      • Telese Terme, Italy, 82037
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Laura Marcuccio, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of chronic neuromuscular diseases (e.g. ALS, CIDP, CMT)
  • Patient able to walk independently or with assistance
  • Patients capable of understanding and adhering to the study protocol.
  • Patients who have provided informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with unstable medical conditions (e.g. severe cardiovascular diseases, such as "New York Heart Association" - NYHA=4, respiratory distress not compensated by ventilation) that could interfere, in the clinician's judgment, with their ability to safely participate in the study or to perform the assessments related to the protocol.
  • Patients currently participating in other clinical trials that could interfere with this study.
  • Pregnant women.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Control group
The patients will receive the traditional rehabilitative treatment according to the good clinical practice according to the Diagnostic, Therapeutic and Care Pathways of each center involved
Traditional rehabilitative treatment
Active Comparator: Robotic treatment group
In this arm, patients will undergo in motor and cognitive exercise using the VR device (e.g., VRRS EVO), treatment with proprioceptive exercises on a platform (e.g., GEA MASTER or PROKIN Technobody) to enhance postural control, aerobic exercises on a robotic treadmill (e.g. Walkerview Technobody) and usual physiotherapy treatment, such as passive and active assisted exercises
Virtual Reality (e.g., VRRS Evo): Provides an engaging and immersive environment for cognitive and motor exercises. Stabilometric Platform (e.g., Gea Master or Prokin Technobody): Used for balance and postural control training. Treadmill System (e.g., Walkerview Technobody): Used for aerobic exercises with gait analysis and feedback

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in Fatigue Severity Scale
Time Frame: At day 0, at day 15, at day 30, at day 45, at day 60
The Fatigue Severity Scale questionnaire contains nine statements that rate the severity of the fatigue symptoms (from 1 to 7, where 1 means complete disagreement with the statement and 7 means complete agreement).
At day 0, at day 15, at day 30, at day 45, at day 60

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in Time Up and Go Test
Time Frame: At day 0, at day 15, at day 30, at day 45, at day 60
Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) is a simple test used to assess mobility, balance and locomotor performance. It uses the time that a person need to rise from a chair, walk three meters, turn around 180 degrees, walk back to the chair and sit down while turning 180 degrees. The shorter the time taken to perform the test, the better the patient's mobility.
At day 0, at day 15, at day 30, at day 45, at day 60
Change from baseline in 2-Minute Walking Test
Time Frame: At day 0, at day 15, at day 30, at day 45, at day 60
The Two-Minute Walk Test (2MWT) is a simple and quick assessment used to measure a person's walking endurance and functional mobility. It is based on the measurement of the distance that a person can walk in two minutes. The individual is instructed to walk as far as possible in two minutes, typically along a marked course. Assistive devices can be used if needed but should be kept consistent across tests. The total distance walked in meters is recorded.
At day 0, at day 15, at day 30, at day 45, at day 60
Change from baseline in 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12)
Time Frame: At day 0, at day 30 and day 60
The SF-12 is a self-reported questionnaire designed to measure health-related quality of life. It is a shortened version of the SF-36, created to reduce the burden on respondents while still providing reliable and valid results. The SF-12 covers eight health domains: Physical functioning; Role-physical (limitations due to physical health problems); Bodily pain; General health; Vitality (energy and fatigue); Social functioning; Role-emotional (limitations due to emotional problems); Mental health (psychological distress and well-being). The survey produces two summary scores: Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS). These scores are norm-based, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Scores above 50 indicate better-than-average health related quality of life, while scores below 50 suggest below-average health.
At day 0, at day 30 and day 60
Change from baseline in Technology Assisted Rehabilitation Patient Perception Questionnaire
Time Frame: At day 0, at day 30, at day 60
To assess the patient perception of the technology assisted rehabilitation using the Technology Assisted Rehabilitation Patient Perception Questionnaire (TARPP-Q). The TARPP-Q consists of 10 questions with multiple choice answers, totalling 29 items. The Questionnaire assesses patients' personal experiences and perceptions of technology assisted rehabilitation, including aspects like usability, positive attitude, hindrance perception, and distress.
At day 0, at day 30, at day 60
Change from baseline in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease neuropathy score
Time Frame: At day 0, day 30 and day 60
The Charcot-Marie-Tooth Neuropathy Score (CMTNS) is a clinical scale used to assess the severity of Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy. This scale is used both to monitor disease progression and to assess the effectiveness of potential experimental treatments. Consists of 9 items, grouped into 3 major categories: Patient-Reported Symptoms, Clinical Examination and Electrophysiological data. Each item is scored from 0 to 4, where 0 means no impairment and 4 very severe impairment, with a total score ranges from 0 to 36.
At day 0, day 30 and day 60
Change from baseline in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale Revised
Time Frame: At day 0, at day 30 and at day 60
The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale Revised (ALSFRS-R) is a scale that includes 12 questions, related to bulbar, motor and respiratory function. This scale is commonly used to evaluate the severity and progression of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Each item can have a score from 0 to 4, with a maximum total score of 48, where a score of 0 would indicate no function while a score of 4 would indicate normal function.
At day 0, at day 30 and at day 60

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in Insulin Growth Factor 1 and free Insulin Growth Factor 1
Time Frame: At day 0, at day 15, at day 30, at day 60
Will be measured these biomarkers in order to assess the levels changes during the treatment. Serum level will be measured in nanogram/milliliter
At day 0, at day 15, at day 30, at day 60
Change from baseline in Neurofilament-Light chain
Time Frame: At day 0, at day 15, at day 30, at day 60
Will be measured this biomarker in order to assess the levels changes during the treatment. Plasma level will be measured in picogram/milliliter.
At day 0, at day 15, at day 30, at day 60
Change from baseline in Sarcopenia level
Time Frame: At day 0, at day 30 and day 60
Sarcopenia level will be measured through two different analysis. One of this analysis is the assessment of Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass (ASMM). ASMM is measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) devices, which assess body composition by analyzing the electrical resistance of body tissues. A low ASMM is a key indicator of sarcopenia, the age-related loss of muscle mass. ASMM is measured in kilograms.
At day 0, at day 30 and day 60
Change from baseline in Sarcopenia level
Time Frame: At day 0, at day 15, at day 30 and day 60
The other analysis used to assess the level of sarcopenia will be the measurement of Temporal Muscle Thickness (TMT) using ultrasound imaging. Craniofacial muscle mass has been identified as a reliable indicator for detecting sarcopenia, in addition to thoracolumbar skeletal muscle mass. Ultrasound imaging is performed on the temporal muscle to measure parameters such as muscle thickness (measurement of the musclular depth from the skin surface) and cross-sectional area (area of the muscle in a specific plane, indicating muscle mass).
At day 0, at day 15, at day 30 and day 60

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 28, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease

Clinical Trials on Rehabilitation

Subscribe