Study to Evaluate Sepofarsen in Subjects With Leber Congenital Amaurosis (LCA) Type 10 (HYPERION) (HYPERION)

June 2, 2026 updated by: Laboratoires Thea

A Double-Masked, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Paired-Eye Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Sepofarsen in Subjects With Leber Congenital Amaurosis (LCA) Due to the c.2991+1655A>G (p.Cys998X) Mutation in the CEP290 Gene

The purpose of this double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled, paired-eye study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of Sepofarsen in subjects with Leber Congenital Amaurosis (LCA) due to the c.2991+1655A>G (p.Cys998X) mutation in the CEP290.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled, paired-eye study in which one eye of each subject will serve as a control.

At the start of the study the two eyes of each subject will be randomized such that one eye receives sepofarsen and the other eye receives placebo for the first year. In the second year, for all subjects, the eye that was randomized to receive sepofarsen will continue to receive sepofarsen. For the eye that was randomized to placebo in the first year, treatment in the second year will be allocated, as follows: 50% of the eyes will continue to receive placebo, and 50% of the eyes will receive sepofarsen.

Sepofarsen and placebo will be administered via intravitreal injection every 6 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

32

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Sepul Bio Chief Medical Officer

Study Locations

      • Ghent, Belgium, 9000
        • Recruiting
        • Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent (UZ)
    • Minas Gerais
      • Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 30150270
        • Recruiting
        • INRET Clínica/ Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Belo Horizonte
    • São Paulo
      • São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 04023-062
        • Recruiting
        • Federal University of São Paulo - Hospital São Paulo (UNIFESP-HSP)
    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2C8
        • Recruiting
        • University of Alberta
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2L3
        • Recruiting
        • The Hospital for Sick Children - SickKids
      • Paris, France, 75012
        • Recruiting
        • Centre de maladies rares CHNO des Quinze Vingt
      • Giessen, Germany, 35392
        • Recruiting
        • Justus-Liebig Universität - Department of Ophthalmology
      • München, Germany, 81377
        • Recruiting
        • Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilian Universität München
      • Tübingen, Germany, 72076
        • Recruiting
        • University of Tuebingen - Inst. for Ophthalmic Research
      • Nijmegen, Netherlands, 6525 GA
        • Recruiting
        • Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum
      • London, United Kingdom, EC1V 2PD
        • Recruiting
        • Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94158
        • Recruiting
        • UCSF Wayne and Gladys Valley Center for Vision
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33156
        • Recruiting
        • University of Miami - Bascom Palmer Eye Institute
    • Iowa
      • Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242
        • Recruiting
        • University of Iowa
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • Recruiting
        • University of Minnesota Medical School
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Recruiting
        • University of Pennsylvania - Center for Advanced Retinal & Ocular Therapeutics

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Confirmed clinical diagnosis of LCA10 and a molecular diagnosis of homozygosity or compound heterozygosity for the c.2991+1655A>G mutation in CEP290.
  2. Adults: >=18 years / Minors: 6 to <18 years.
  3. BCVA (FrACT) equal to or worse than logMAR +0.4 (approximate Snellen equivalent 20/50) to +2.9 logMAR based on quantifiable, reliable FrACT. LP subjects with documented evidence of prior better vision eligible.
  4. Symmetrical disease between the two eyes as defined by a BCVA (FrACT) within 0.2 logMAR at baseline.
  5. Detectable ONL in the macular area as determined by the CRC at Screening.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Mutations in genes other than the CEP290 gene associated with other IRD diseases or syndromes.
  2. Presence of any ocular pathology in either eye that may make comparison of the eyes not feasible.
  3. Presence of unstable concurrent CME, or subject started on (or changed dose of) topical or systemic carbonic anhydrase inhibitor treatment in the 3 months prior to enrollment. CME is allowed if stable for 3 months (with or without treatment).
  4. Presence of any clinically significant lens opacities/cataracts based on the AREDS lens grading scale.
  5. Any prior receipt of genetic (RNA or DNA therapy) or stem-cell therapy for ocular or non-ocular disease, including sepofarsen.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Sepofarsen - Treatment Eye - up to Month 12
Subjects to receive Sepofarsen in one eye (160µg first then 40µg) and Placebo in the fellow eye at baseline and at month 6.
RNA antisense oligonucleotide for intravitreal injection
Other Names:
  • QR-110
Placebo Comparator: Placebo - Fellow Eye - up to Month 12
Subjects to receive Sepofarsen in one eye (160µg first then 40µg) and Placebo in the fellow eye at baseline and at month 6.
Placebo with identical appearance to sepofarsen
Active Comparator: Continued - Treatment Eye - up to Month 24
Subjects to receive Sepofarsen (40µg) in one eye and Placebo in the fellow eye at Month 12 and Month 18.
RNA antisense oligonucleotide for intravitreal injection
Other Names:
  • QR-110
Placebo Comparator: Continued - Fellow Eye - up to Month 24
Subjects to receive Sepofarsen (40µg) in one eye and Placebo in the fellow eye at Month 12 and Month 18.
Placebo with identical appearance to sepofarsen
Active Comparator: Mixed - Treatment Eye - up to Month 24
Subjects to receive Sepofarsen (40µg) in one eye and Sepofarsen in the fellow eye (160µg first then 40µg) at Month 12 and at Month 18.
RNA antisense oligonucleotide for intravitreal injection
Other Names:
  • QR-110
Active Comparator: Mixed - Fellow Eye - Month 12 to Month 24
Subjects to receive Sepofarsen (40µg) in one eye and Sepofarsen in the fellow eye (160µg first then 40µg) at Month 12 and at Month 18.
RNA antisense oligonucleotide for intravitreal injection
Other Names:
  • QR-110
Placebo Comparator: Mixed - Fellow Eye - up to Month 12

Subjects to receive Sepofarsen (40µg) in one eye and Sepofarsen in the fellow eye (160µg first then 40µg) at Month 12 and at Month 18

Note: up to Month 12 these subjects receive placebo in the Fellow Eye, as all subjects do.

Placebo with identical appearance to sepofarsen

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)
Time Frame: 12 Months
Change from baseline in BCVA based on the Freiburg Acuity and Contrast Test (FrACT) between Treatment Eyes (TEs) and Placebo Control Eyes (PCEs)
12 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in Low Luminance Visual Acuity (LLVA) based on FrACT between Treatment Eyes (TEs) and Placebo Control Eyes (PCEs)
Time Frame: Month 12
Month 12
Change from baseline in retinal sensitivity as measured by dark-adapted Full-Field Stimulus Test (FST) between Treatment Eyes (TEs) and Placebo Control Eyes (PCEs)
Time Frame: Month 12
Month 12
Eye-specific Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) between Treatment Eyes (TEs) and Placebo Control Eyes (PCEs)
Time Frame: Month 12
PGI-C (PATIENT GLOBAL IMPRESSION OF CHANGE ) assesses a patient's perception of overall change in their vision in the respective eye over time. The minimum score (best outcome) is 1 ("Very Much Better") and the maximum score (worst outcome) is 7 ("Very Much Worse"). Higher scores indicate a worse health outcome (greater worsening).
Month 12
Change from baseline in Contrast Sensitivity (CS) between Treatment Eyes (TEs) and Placebo Control Eyes (PCEs) based on qCSF
Time Frame: Month 12
Month 12
Change from baseline in retinal sensitivity as measured by light-adapted Full-Field Stimulus Test (FST) between Treatment Eyes (TEs) and Placebo Control Eyes (PCEs)
Time Frame: Month 12
Month 12
Response in BCVA (FrACT), defined as an improvement of at least 0.2 logMAR from baseline at 12 months and compared between Treatment Eyes (TEs) and Placebo Control Eyes (PCEs), evaluated by the percentage of eyes that achieve this improvement.
Time Frame: Month 12
Month 12
Response in BCVA (FrACT), defined as an improvement of at least 0.3 logMAR from baseline at 12 months and compared between Treatment Eyes (TEs) and Placebo Control Eyes (PCEs), evaluated by the percentage of eyes that achieve this improvement.
Time Frame: Month 12
Month 12
Response in Low Luminance Visual Acuity (LLVA) defined as clinically relevant improvement between Treatment Eyes (TEs) and Placebo Control Eyes (PCEs) at 12 months, evaluated by the percentage of eyes that achieve this improvement.
Time Frame: Month 12
Month 12
Response in Full-Field Stimulus Test (FST) defined as clinically relevant improvement between Treatment Eyes (TEs) and Placebo Control Eyes (PCEs) at 12 months, evaluated by the percentage of eyes that achieve this improvement.
Time Frame: Month 12
Month 12
Response in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) defined as clinically relevant improvement between Treatment Eyes (TEs) and Placebo Control Eyes (PCEs) at 12 months, evaluated by the percentage of eyes that achieve this improvement.
Time Frame: Month 12
Month 12
Response in Contrast Sensitivity (CS) defined as clinically relevant improvement between Treatment Eyes (TEs) and Placebo Control Eyes (PCEs) at 12 months, evaluated by the percentage of eyes that achieve this improvement.
Time Frame: Month 12
Month 12
Change from baseline in the Michigan Retinal Degeneration Questionnaire (MRDQ) score for subjects ≥ 13 years of age
Time Frame: Month 12
Month 12
Change from baseline in the Michigan Vision-Related Anxiety Questionnaire (MVAQ) score for subjects ≥ 13 years of age
Time Frame: Month 12
Month 12
Change from baseline in the Pediatric Eye Questionnaire (PedEyeQ) score for subjects < 13 years of age
Time Frame: Month 12
Month 12
Change from baseline in eye-specific Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) between Treatment Eyes (TEs) and Placebo Control Eyes (PCEs)
Time Frame: Month 12
PGI-S (PATIENT GLOBAL IMPRESSION OF SEVERITY ) assesses a patient's perception of severity of their eye condition in the respective eye over the past week. The minimum score (best outcome) is 1 ("None") and the maximum score (worst outcome) is 5 ("Very Severe"). Higher scores indicate a worse health outcome (greater severity).
Month 12
Response defined as a clinically relevant improvement according to a multimodal assessment in TEs compared to the corresponding response in PCEs at 12 months
Time Frame: Month 12
The multimodal assessment is based on a combination of visual acuity, retinal sensitivity, CS, functional vision, and/or PRO
Month 12
Change from baseline in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) based on the ETDRS and/or the BRVT between Treatment Eyes (TEs) and Placebo Control Eyes (PCEs)
Time Frame: Month 12
Month 12
Change from baseline in Low Luminance Visual Acuity (LLVA) based on the ETDRS between Treatment Eyes (TEs) and Placebo Control Eyes (PCEs)
Time Frame: Month 12
Month 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 4, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 24, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Eye Diseases

Clinical Trials on sepofarsen

Subscribe