Paromomycin or Metronidazole for Symptomatic Dientamoeba Fragilis in Adults (COMFORTER)

March 26, 2025 updated by: Prof. Dafna Yahav, Sheba Medical Center

Paromomycin or Metronidazole for Symptomatic Dientamoeba Fragilis in Adults (COMFORTER Trial) - Protocol for a Superiority Double Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

Dientameba Fragilis (D.fragilis) is a protozoan found in the digestive tract - in the human colon. there are disagreements regarding the preferred treatment for these cases, with several regimens tested in mostly small observational studies. Several drugs are currently recommended for D.fragilis, with metronidazole most commonly used. However, metronidazole therapy for treating dientamoebiasis in children was not associated with better clinical outcomes in a randomized, double-blinded and placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Hence, we aim to perform a double blind, randomized controlled trial, evaluating the clinical and microbiological efficacy of paromomycin versus metronidazole for the treatment of symptomatic adults with PCR positive dientamoeba fragilis.

The primary outcomes would be clinical improvement or resolution. Secondary outcomes include clinical improvement evaluated by a visual analogue scale; microbiological eradication, quality of life, and adverse events related to therapy.

We plan to include 60 patients (30 per arm)

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Introduction Dientameba Fragilis (D.fragilis) is a protozoan found in the digestive tract - in the human colon. The route of transmission is fecal-oral, and infection can lead to chronic gastrointestinal symptoms manifested by abdominal pain, diarrhea, abdominal bloating, anal pruritus, and in addition pronounced fatigue [1]. Since the introduction of a molecular diagnosis [PCR] for a stool test, it has become clear that these protozoa are a main protozoa inhabiting the digestive system, with stool positivity rates ranging from 12 to 68%, depending on country and age [2].

This parasite was first identified about 100 years ago and since then debates have continued in the medical literature as to whether it is indeed a pathogen or a commensal [3]. In addition, there are disagreements regarding the preferred treatment for these cases, with several regimens tested in mostly small observational studies. Several drugs are currently recommended for D.fragilis, with metronidazole most commonly used [4]. However, metronidazole therapy for treating dientamoebiasis in children was not associated with better clinical outcomes in a randomized, double-blinded and placebo-controlled clinical trial. Furthermore despite observing higher eradication rates two weeks after end of therapy with metronidazole in this trial, positivity rebounded quickly appeared after therapy. [5]. In contrast, several observational studies have reported high clinical and microbiological success rates with paromomycin, with over 80% eradication in adults [6,7]. We could not identify any prospective study comparing head to head these two drugs; metronidazole and paromomycin.

In light of the above, we plan to perform a double blind, randomized controlled trial, evaluating the clinical and microbiological efficacy of paromomycin versus metronidazole for the treatment of symptomatic adults with PCR positive dientamoeba fragilis.

The primary outcomes is clinical improvement or resolution (yes/no. Secondary outcomes include clinical improvement evaluated by a visual analogue scale; microbiological eradication, quality of life, and adverse events related to therapy.

Aim

  • To evaluate clinical response to paromomycin versus metronidazole treatment.
  • To evaluate whether paromomycin is superior to metronidazole in eradicating D. fragilis in molecular stool testing (PCR) 3-4 weeks after end of therapy.
  • Additional aim is to evaluate the relationship between clinical cure and eradication of the parasite.

Design: Double-blind Randomized Controlled study comparing metronidazole vs. paromomycin treatment in patients with prolonged gastrointestinal symptoms and positive D. fragilis in molecular (PCR) stool test.

Patients will be approached through social networks advertisements, infectious diseases and gastrointestinal clinics, inviting individuals suffering from gastrointestinal symptoms over one month who had a positive PCR test for D. fragilis in the previous 6 months. These patients will be invited for a clinic visit.

Population:

Inclusion criteria: Patients over the age of 18, not including pregnant women - With persistent gastrointestinal symptoms (over one month).

  • Without any other clear diagnosis to explain these symptoms according to medical records.
  • With a positive PCR stool test for D. fragilis without any additional pathogen (patients with Blastocystis hominis in feces will not be excluded).

Exclusion criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or to aminoglycosides
  • Patients age below 18 years
  • Metronidazole or paromomycin treatment in the last 3 months

Intervention: After signing informed consent, study participants will fill out symptoms questionnaire, built in 4-point Likert scale (See Appendix).

We will randomize them into two treatment arms: paromomycin and metronidazole. Randomization will be generated by computer and will be central. Study allocation will be blinded from patients, principal investigators and outcome assessors.

Medical treatment planned for 7 days as follows:

  1. Metronidazole 500mg X3 / day
  2. Paromomycin 500mg X3 / day In both preparations the pill is 250 mg, so both treatment arms will have the same number of tabs and same length of treatment. Patients will be provided with the drugs for 7 days (we will examine the possibility of making it identical in appearance).

Follow-up

  1. Monitoring side effects for each drug - using a questionnaire. This will be conducted by telephone at the end of the treatment (one week) by a research assistant (without passing the information to the doctor - to prevent revealing of blinding).
  2. In person meeting with a study physician 3-4 weeks after completion of treatment, at which time the patient will fill out a structured questionnaire for symptom evaluation (See Appendix). The physician will be blinded to the patient's treatment. Clinical improvement will be defined as improvement in the Likert scale in at least one symptom, with no exacerbation in any other symptom.
  3. Repeated PCR stool test 3-4 weeks after the end of treatment.
  4. An additional similar visit will be held at 8 and 12 weeks after end to treatment.

Sample size calculation for superiority:

In order to show superiority of paromomycin with 90% power and an Alpha of 5%, assuming 80% clinical improvement with paromomycin versus 40% with metronidazole, a sample size of 27 patients per arm will be required. Considering a dropout rate of up to 10%, we estimate a sample size of 60 patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients over the age of 18, not including pregnant women - With persistent gastrointestinal symptoms (over one month).

  • Without any other clear diagnosis to explain these symptoms according to medical records.
  • With a positive PCR stool test for D. fragilis without any additional pathogen (patients with Blastocystis hominis in feces will not be excluded).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or to aminoglycosides
  • Patients age below 18 years
  • Metronidazole or paromomycin treatment in the last 3 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Paromomycin
Paromomycin 500mg X3 / day
Paromomycin 500mg X3 / day
Other Names:
  • Kaman
Active Comparator: Metronidazole
Metronidazole 500mg X3 / day
Paromomycin 500mg X3 / day
Other Names:
  • Kaman

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
clinical improvement or resolution
Time Frame: 30 day
clinical improvement or resolution
30 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
clinical improvement by a visual analogue scale
Time Frame: 30 day
clinical improvement by a visual analogue scale
30 day
microbiological eradication
Time Frame: 30 day
microbiological eradication - negative PCR
30 day
Quality of life scale
Time Frame: 30 day
Quality of life scale
30 day
Adverse events
Time Frame: 30 day
Adverse events - gastrointestinal, neurological
30 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dafna Yahav, MD, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 22, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 20, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

IPD would be shared in case of reasonable request from the PI

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Within 90 days from study completion and for 1 year

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

By request from PI

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dientamoeba Fragilis Infection

Clinical Trials on Paromomycin

Subscribe