- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06918223
Assessing Patient Satisfaction and Confidence After Use of Educational Video to Augment Surgical Consent for Thyroid Surgery (TISCAV)
April 9, 2025 updated by: Thomas Jefferson University
This study looks at how a short educational video can help people better understand thyroid surgery.
Patients who have thyroid nodules and need surgery will be part of the study.
Some patients will get the usual information from their doctor, while others will also watch a video that explains the surgery in a simple and clear way.
The study will check if the video helps patients feel more confident about their decision, lowers anxiety, and helps them remember important information about their surgery.
Patients will answer surveys before surgery, after surgery, and 3 months later.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
60
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Annie Moroco Assistant Professor, MD
- Phone Number: 215-955-6826
- Email: Annie.Moroco@jefferson.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Hani Research Fellow, BS
- Phone Number: 3216091134
- Email: hxs597@jefferson.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
- Recruiting
- Thomas Jefferson University
-
Contact:
- Elizabeth Cottrill Assistant Professor, MD
- Phone Number: 215-955-6760
- Email: Elizabeth.Cottrill@jefferson.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria Fluent in English
- English is Primary Language
- ≥18 years old at time of consent
- Eligible for Thyroidectomy, lobectomy, isthmusectomy for any indication
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of prior thyroid surgery
- Previously consented for thyroid surgery
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention: TISCAV
|
Participants randomized to the intervention group will receive a surgeon-created Thyroid Informed Surgical Consent Augmenting Video (TISCAV).
This 8-minute video includes animated visuals and a surgeon voiceover explaining thyroid anatomy, surgical options (lobectomy vs. total thyroidectomy), risks, benefits, and expectations.
The TISCAV was designed and reviewed by an endocrine surgery team to improve patient comprehension, confidence, satisfaction, and reduce decision regret compared to standard verbal consent alone.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Control: Standard Consent
|
Participants receiving the Standard Consent intervention will undergo the routine informed consent process for thyroid surgery provided by their surgeon.
This process includes a verbal discussion covering thyroidectomy procedure details, potential risks and complications, benefits, alternatives such as active surveillance, and an opportunity to ask questions.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient knowledge score using a 10-item internally validated Thyroid Surgery Knowledge Assessment
Time Frame: Immediately after study enrollment (pre-consent) and immediately following the surgical consent process (post-consent)
|
This outcome measures patient knowledge of thyroid surgery, including indications, procedural options, risks, and benefits.
A 10-question internally developed and validated multiple-choice questionnaire will be administered before and after the informed consent process.
Each correct answer is scored as 1 point, with a total score ranging from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate greater understanding and retention of surgical information.
|
Immediately after study enrollment (pre-consent) and immediately following the surgical consent process (post-consent)
|
|
Decisional Conflict Score using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS)
Time Frame: Preoperatively (after the consent process and before surgery)
|
This outcome measures patient uncertainty and confidence related to thyroid surgery decision-making using the validated 16-item Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS).
The DCS evaluates five subdomains: uncertainty, feeling informed, values clarity, support, and perceived effectiveness of the decision.
Each item is scored from 0 (strongly agree) to 4 (strongly disagree), then standardized to a total score ranging from 0 to 100.
Higher scores reflect greater decisional conflict and more difficulty with making a decision.
|
Preoperatively (after the consent process and before surgery)
|
|
Satisfaction with Decision Score using the Satisfaction with Decision Scale (SDS)
Time Frame: Immediately after consent (Preoperative), Postoperative Day 22, and Postoperative Day 100
|
This outcome assesses patient satisfaction with their decision to undergo thyroid surgery using the validated 6-item Satisfaction with Decision Scale (SDS).
Each item is scored from 1 (not satisfied) to 5 (very satisfied), with a total score ranging from 6 to 30.
Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with the decision-making process and outcome.
|
Immediately after consent (Preoperative), Postoperative Day 22, and Postoperative Day 100
|
|
Decision Regret Score using the Decision Regret Scale (DRS)
Time Frame: Postoperative Day 22 and Postoperative Day 100
|
This outcome evaluates postoperative regret related to undergoing thyroid surgery using the validated 5-item Decision Regret Scale (DRS).
Each item is scored from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree), with scores converted to a 0-100 scale.
Higher scores reflect greater decision regret.
|
Postoperative Day 22 and Postoperative Day 100
|
|
Anxiety Score using the Visual Analog Scale for Anxiety (VAS-A)
Time Frame: Immediately after consent (Preoperative), Postoperative Day 22, and Postoperative Day 100
|
This outcome measures patients' current level of anxiety using the validated Visual Analog Scale for Anxiety (VAS-A), a single-item scale presented as a 100 mm line ranging from "calm" to "anxious."
Participants place a mark on the scale reflecting their current state.
The score is recorded as a number from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety.
|
Immediately after consent (Preoperative), Postoperative Day 22, and Postoperative Day 100
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Elizabeth Cottrill Assistant Professor and Program Director, MD, Assistant Professor and Program Director
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Kindler CH, Harms C, Amsler F, Ihde-Scholl T, Scheidegger D. The visual analog scale allows effective measurement of preoperative anxiety and detection of patients' anesthetic concerns. Anesth Analg. 2000 Mar;90(3):706-12. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200003000-00036.
- Domar AD, Everett LL, Keller MG. Preoperative anxiety: is it a predictable entity? Anesth Analg. 1989 Dec;69(6):763-7.
- Kessels RP. Patients' memory for medical information. J R Soc Med. 2003 May;96(5):219-22. doi: 10.1177/014107680309600504. No abstract available.
- Nehme J, El-Khani U, Chow A, Hakky S, Ahmed AR, Purkayastha S. The use of multimedia consent programs for surgical procedures: a systematic review. Surg Innov. 2013 Feb;20(1):13-23. doi: 10.1177/1553350612446352. Epub 2012 May 14.
- Levy N, Landmann L, Stermer E, Erdreich M, Beny A, Meisels R. Does a detailed explanation prior to gastroscopy reduce the patient's anxiety? Endoscopy. 1989 Nov;21(6):263-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1012965.
- Thomas T, Robinson C, Champion D, McKell M, Pell M. Prediction and assessment of the severity of post-operative pain and of satisfaction with management. Pain. 1998 Apr;75(2-3):177-85. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(97)00218-2.
- McCleane GJ, Cooper R. The nature of pre-operative anxiety. Anaesthesia. 1990 Feb;45(2):153-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1990.tb14285.x.
- D'Souza V, Blouin E, Zeitouni A, Muller K, Allison PJ. Do multimedia based information services increase knowledge and satisfaction in head and neck cancer patients? Oral Oncol. 2013 Sep;49(9):943-949. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
- Hakimi AA, Standiford L, Chang E, Wong BJ. Development and Assessment of a Video-Based Intervention to Improve Rhinoplasty Informed Consent. Facial Plast Surg. 2021 Oct;37(5):585-589. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1722912. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
- Siu JM, Rotenberg BW, Franklin JH, Sowerby LJ. Multimedia in the informed consent process for endoscopic sinus surgery: A randomized control trial. Laryngoscope. 2016 Jun;126(6):1273-8. doi: 10.1002/lary.25793. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
- Sudore RL, Landefeld CS, Williams BA, Barnes DE, Lindquist K, Schillinger D. Use of a modified informed consent process among vulnerable patients: a descriptive study. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Aug;21(8):867-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00535.x. Erratum In: J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Sep;21(9):1009.
- Burns P, Keogh I, Timon C. Informed consent: a patients' perspective. J Laryngol Otol. 2005 Jan;119(1):19-22. doi: 10.1258/0022215053222860.
- Hekkenberg RJ, Irish JC, Rotstein LE, Brown DH, Gullane PJ. Informed consent in head and neck surgery: how much do patients actually remember? J Otolaryngol. 1997 Jun;26(3):155-9.
- Oosthuizen JC, Burns P, Timon C. The changing face of informed surgical consent. J Laryngol Otol. 2012 Mar;126(3):236-9. doi: 10.1017/S0022215111003021. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
- Sherlock A, Brownie S. Patients' recollection and understanding of informed consent: a literature review. ANZ J Surg. 2014 Apr;84(4):207-10. doi: 10.1111/ans.12555.
- Mulsow JJ, Feeley TM, Tierney S. Beyond consent--improving understanding in surgical patients. Am J Surg. 2012 Jan;203(1):112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.12.010. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
November 10, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 18, 2025
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 7, 2025
First Posted (Actual)
April 9, 2025
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 13, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 9, 2025
Last Verified
April 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 20E.663
- Stryker (Other Identifier: Stryker)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
The datasets generated and analyzed during this study will not be publicly available due to patient confidentiality and institutional data-sharing policies.
However, de-identified participant-level data (IPD) may be shared with qualified researchers upon reasonable request to the corresponding author, subject to institutional and ethical approvals.
The data will be made available for research purposes related to patient comprehension, decision-making, and informed consent in surgical settings.
Access will be granted following approval of a research proposal and a signed data access agreement.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Thyroid Cancer
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedInsular Thyroid Cancer | Recurrent Thyroid Cancer | Stage IV Follicular Thyroid Cancer | Stage IV Papillary Thyroid Cancer | Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer | Stage III Follicular Thyroid Cancer | Stage III Papillary Thyroid CancerUnited States
-
University of WashingtonNational Cancer Institute (NCI); GlaxoSmithKline; National Comprehensive Cancer...CompletedRecurrent Thyroid Cancer | Stage IVA Follicular Thyroid Cancer | Stage IVA Papillary Thyroid Cancer | Stage IVB Follicular Thyroid Cancer | Stage IVB Papillary Thyroid Cancer | Stage IVC Follicular Thyroid Cancer | Stage IVC Papillary Thyroid CancerUnited States
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaEli Lilly and Company; United States Department of DefenseRecruitingCancer | Pediatric Cancer | Differentiated Thyroid Cancer | Cancer, ThyroidUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedRecurrent Thyroid Cancer | Stage IVA Follicular Thyroid Cancer | Stage IVA Papillary Thyroid Cancer | Stage IVB Follicular Thyroid Cancer | Stage IVB Papillary Thyroid Cancer | Stage IVC Follicular Thyroid Cancer | Stage IVC Papillary Thyroid CancerUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedInsular Thyroid Cancer | Recurrent Thyroid Cancer | Stage II Follicular Thyroid Cancer | Stage II Papillary Thyroid Cancer | Stage IV Follicular Thyroid Cancer | Stage IV Papillary Thyroid CancerUnited States
-
University of PennsylvaniaCompletedMetastatic Medullary Thyroid Cancer | Metastatic Differentiated Thyroid Cancer | Metastatic Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer | Metastatic Poorly Differentiated Thyroid CancerUnited States
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaBayerRecruitingCancer | Pediatric Cancer | Differentiated Thyroid Cancer | Cancer, ThyroidUnited States
-
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research InstituteTerminatedThyroid Cancer, Medullary | Thyroid Cancer | Papillary Thyroid Cancer | Differentiated Thyroid Cancer | Poorly Differentiated Thyroid Gland Carcinoma | Follicular Thyroid CancerUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedRecurrent Thyroid Cancer | Stage IV Follicular Thyroid Cancer | Stage IV Papillary Thyroid CancerUnited States
-
Bhavana KondaNational Comprehensive Cancer NetworkCompletedInsular Thyroid Cancer | Recurrent Thyroid Cancer | Papillary Thyroid Cancer | Follicular Thyroid CancerUnited States
Clinical Trials on Thyroid Informed Surgical Consent Augmenting Video (TISCAV)
-
Felix C. Stengel, MDCantonal Hospital St. GallenCompleted
-
Changhai HospitalUnknown
-
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterNot yet recruitingPancreas CancerUnited States
-
University of California, DavisCompleted
-
University of Texas at AustinActive, not recruitingPediatrics | Informed Consent | Lumbar Puncture | Emergency Department PatientUnited States
-
Emory UniversityEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...CompletedHealthyUnited States
-
Carnegie Mellon UniversityICON plcCompletedConsent Forms
-
Emory UniversityCompleted
-
Kantonsspital Winterthur KSWRecruiting
-
Hospital Universitario Puerto RealUniversity of CadizCompletedProstatic Hyperplasia | Bladder CancerSpain