Assessing Patient Satisfaction and Confidence After Use of Educational Video to Augment Surgical Consent for Thyroid Surgery (TISCAV)

April 9, 2025 updated by: Thomas Jefferson University
This study looks at how a short educational video can help people better understand thyroid surgery. Patients who have thyroid nodules and need surgery will be part of the study. Some patients will get the usual information from their doctor, while others will also watch a video that explains the surgery in a simple and clear way. The study will check if the video helps patients feel more confident about their decision, lowers anxiety, and helps them remember important information about their surgery. Patients will answer surveys before surgery, after surgery, and 3 months later.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria Fluent in English

  • English is Primary Language
  • ≥18 years old at time of consent
  • Eligible for Thyroidectomy, lobectomy, isthmusectomy for any indication

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of prior thyroid surgery
  • Previously consented for thyroid surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention: TISCAV
Participants randomized to the intervention group will receive a surgeon-created Thyroid Informed Surgical Consent Augmenting Video (TISCAV). This 8-minute video includes animated visuals and a surgeon voiceover explaining thyroid anatomy, surgical options (lobectomy vs. total thyroidectomy), risks, benefits, and expectations. The TISCAV was designed and reviewed by an endocrine surgery team to improve patient comprehension, confidence, satisfaction, and reduce decision regret compared to standard verbal consent alone.
Placebo Comparator: Control: Standard Consent
Participants receiving the Standard Consent intervention will undergo the routine informed consent process for thyroid surgery provided by their surgeon. This process includes a verbal discussion covering thyroidectomy procedure details, potential risks and complications, benefits, alternatives such as active surveillance, and an opportunity to ask questions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient knowledge score using a 10-item internally validated Thyroid Surgery Knowledge Assessment
Time Frame: Immediately after study enrollment (pre-consent) and immediately following the surgical consent process (post-consent)
This outcome measures patient knowledge of thyroid surgery, including indications, procedural options, risks, and benefits. A 10-question internally developed and validated multiple-choice questionnaire will be administered before and after the informed consent process. Each correct answer is scored as 1 point, with a total score ranging from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate greater understanding and retention of surgical information.
Immediately after study enrollment (pre-consent) and immediately following the surgical consent process (post-consent)
Decisional Conflict Score using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS)
Time Frame: Preoperatively (after the consent process and before surgery)
This outcome measures patient uncertainty and confidence related to thyroid surgery decision-making using the validated 16-item Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). The DCS evaluates five subdomains: uncertainty, feeling informed, values clarity, support, and perceived effectiveness of the decision. Each item is scored from 0 (strongly agree) to 4 (strongly disagree), then standardized to a total score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores reflect greater decisional conflict and more difficulty with making a decision.
Preoperatively (after the consent process and before surgery)
Satisfaction with Decision Score using the Satisfaction with Decision Scale (SDS)
Time Frame: Immediately after consent (Preoperative), Postoperative Day 22, and Postoperative Day 100
This outcome assesses patient satisfaction with their decision to undergo thyroid surgery using the validated 6-item Satisfaction with Decision Scale (SDS). Each item is scored from 1 (not satisfied) to 5 (very satisfied), with a total score ranging from 6 to 30. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with the decision-making process and outcome.
Immediately after consent (Preoperative), Postoperative Day 22, and Postoperative Day 100
Decision Regret Score using the Decision Regret Scale (DRS)
Time Frame: Postoperative Day 22 and Postoperative Day 100
This outcome evaluates postoperative regret related to undergoing thyroid surgery using the validated 5-item Decision Regret Scale (DRS). Each item is scored from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree), with scores converted to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores reflect greater decision regret.
Postoperative Day 22 and Postoperative Day 100
Anxiety Score using the Visual Analog Scale for Anxiety (VAS-A)
Time Frame: Immediately after consent (Preoperative), Postoperative Day 22, and Postoperative Day 100
This outcome measures patients' current level of anxiety using the validated Visual Analog Scale for Anxiety (VAS-A), a single-item scale presented as a 100 mm line ranging from "calm" to "anxious." Participants place a mark on the scale reflecting their current state. The score is recorded as a number from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety.
Immediately after consent (Preoperative), Postoperative Day 22, and Postoperative Day 100

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Elizabeth Cottrill Assistant Professor and Program Director, MD, Assistant Professor and Program Director

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 10, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20E.663
  • Stryker (Other Identifier: Stryker)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The datasets generated and analyzed during this study will not be publicly available due to patient confidentiality and institutional data-sharing policies. However, de-identified participant-level data (IPD) may be shared with qualified researchers upon reasonable request to the corresponding author, subject to institutional and ethical approvals. The data will be made available for research purposes related to patient comprehension, decision-making, and informed consent in surgical settings. Access will be granted following approval of a research proposal and a signed data access agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Thyroid Cancer

Clinical Trials on Thyroid Informed Surgical Consent Augmenting Video (TISCAV)

Subscribe