- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06920134
Epidural Electrical Stimulation to Support Hemodynamic Management in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease (PD-HemON)
Study on Preliminary Safety and Efficacy of the ARC-IM Therapy to Support Hemodynamic Management in People With Typical and Atypical Parkinson's Disease
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Gregoire Courtine, PhD
- Phone Number: +41 21 69 30762
- Email: gregoire.courtine@epfl.ch
Study Locations
-
-
Canton of Vaud
-
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, Switzerland, 1011
- Recruiting
- CHUV
-
Contact:
- Jocelyne Bloch
- Phone Number: +41 79 556 2951
- Email: jocelyne.bloch@chuv.ch
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- > 18 years old
- Typical or Atypical PD (including but not limited to Multiple System Atrophy, Pure Autonomic Failure, Progressive Supranuclear Palsy)
- Confirmed orthostatic hypotension with a test for verticalization
- Confirmed symptomatic orthostatic hypotension that makes daily activities particularly challenging as determined by the study clinicians
- Must provide and sign the Informed Consent before any study-related procedures
- Stable medical, physical, and psychological conditions given participant indication as considered by Investigators;
- Able to understand and interact with the study team in French or English
- Agrees to comply in good faith with all conditions of the study and to attend all scheduled appointments
Exclusion Criteria:
- Diseases and conditions that would increase the morbidity and mortality of the implantation surgery
- The inability to withhold antiplatelet/anticoagulation agents perioperatively
- History of myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular events within the past 6 months
- Unstable or significant medical condition that is likely to interfere with study procedures or likely to confound study endpoint evaluations as determined by the Investigator
- History or presence of major psychiatric disorders or major neurocognitive disorders as considered by the Investigators in accordance with the treating physician and treating neurologist
- Major changes in PD treatment planned until the end of the main study phase (such as DBS or dopamine-pump implantation)
- Inability to follow study procedures.
- Spinal anatomical abnormalities precluding surgery
- Presence of any indications requiring frequent MRIs.
- Current pregnancy or current breastfeeding
- Lack of effective or acceptable contraception for women of childbearing capacity
- Intention to become pregnant during the study
- Unable or unwilling to effectively use the study system or related devices by the participant or caretaker, as determined by the investigator
- Participation in another interventional study that might confound study endpoint evaluations
- Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees, and other dependent persons
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: All participants
All participants will be provided with the ARC-IM Investigational System (implantable and non-implan
|
Implantation of a stimulation lead on the low thoracic level of the spinal cord and implantation of a neurostimulator in the abdominal region.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Occurrence of (serious) adverse device effects of the ARC-IM Therapy from baseline up to the end of the study.
Time Frame: Throughout the study (up to 5 years)
|
Evaluate the safety of ARC-IM Therapy in supporting hemodynamic management in participants with atypical or typical Parkinson's Disease and orthostatic hypotension
|
Throughout the study (up to 5 years)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
10-minute, orthostatic head-up tilt test with and without the ARC-IM Therapy at 1 month after intervention
Time Frame: At the end of, 6 months after and 1 year after configuration of the therapy,
|
Preliminary and long-term efficacy of the ARC-IM Therapy to reduce orthostatic hypotension. Measurement tool: Drop in blood pressure over time (mmHg and sec, mmHg/sec) |
At the end of, 6 months after and 1 year after configuration of the therapy,
|
|
Severity of symptoms measured by The Orthostatic Hypotension Questionnaire.
Time Frame: At the end of, 6 months after and 1 year after configuration of the therapy
|
This outcome measures the preliminary long-term efficacy of the ARC-IM Therapy to support hemodynamic instability. The Orthostatic Hypotension Questionnaire (OHQ) has 10 hypotension symptom-related items rated on a 11 point scale (0 - 10). Measurement tool: 0 indicates no symptoms and 10 indicates worst possible severity/outcome. A higher total score indicates worse symptomatology. |
At the end of, 6 months after and 1 year after configuration of the therapy
|
|
Time Up and Go Test (TUG)
Time Frame: At the end of, 6 months after and 1 year after configuration of the therapy
|
Preliminary efficacy of the ARC-IM Therapy to improve physical activity.
The Time Up and Go will measure time from sit to stand and gait quality.
Measurement tool: time (sec)
|
At the end of, 6 months after and 1 year after configuration of the therapy
|
|
2 Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: At the end of, 6 months after and 1 year after configuration of the therapy
|
Preliminary efficacy of the ARC-IM Therapy to improve physical activity. The 2 Minute Walk Test (2MWT) will measure gait endurance and distance walked over 2 minutes. Measurement tool: distance (meters) |
At the end of, 6 months after and 1 year after configuration of the therapy
|
|
Berg Balance Test
Time Frame: At the end of, 6 months after and 1 year after configuration of the therapy
|
The Berg Balance Test measures the ability to balance safely with 14 specific tasks performed while standing, sitting, or making simple movements. The test scoring ranges from 0 to 56. Measurement tool: lower score indicates greater risk of losing your balance. |
At the end of, 6 months after and 1 year after configuration of the therapy
|
|
Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with technology (QUEST 2.0)
Time Frame: At 6 months and 1 year after configuration of the therapy
|
To measure the usability of the ARC-IM Main Controller, Clinician Programmer, and Personal Programmer for clinicians and participants. The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with technology (QUEST 2.0) is a 12-item instrument that evaluates satisfaction with the therapy across form factor, safety, durability, simplicity of use, comfort, service of device and improvements. The evaluation will be performed by a moderator with the participant. Measurement tool: Total score from 12 to 60. Low score means a better outcome. |
At 6 months and 1 year after configuration of the therapy
|
|
System Usability Scale (SUS)
Time Frame: At 6 months and 1 year after configuration of the therapy
|
Assess the usability of the ARC-IM Main Controller, Clinician Programmer, and Personal Programmer for clinicians and participants. The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a 10-item scale that evaluates the usability and satisfaction of the technology. Measurement tool: Total score from 0 to 100. Higher score indicates better outcome. |
At 6 months and 1 year after configuration of the therapy
|
|
Additional user feedback of ARC-IM System
Time Frame: At 6 months and 1 year after configuration of the therapy
|
To assess the usability of the ARC-IM Main Controller, Clinician Programmer, and Personal Programmer for clinicians and participants. The Additional user feedback of ARC-IM System is a custom-made user feedback questionnaire to evaluate the overall satisfaction of specific aspects of the therapy including battery life, device communication etc. Measurement tool: Total score where applicable (higher score indicates better outcome) and feedback from participants |
At 6 months and 1 year after configuration of the therapy
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Doppler ultrasound to measure cerebral blood perfusion with and without the ARC-IM Therapy
Time Frame: 1 month, 6 months and 12 months post-therapy configuration
|
1 month, 6 months and 12 months post-therapy configuration
|
|
|
Supine hypertension will be evaluated during orthostatic tilt tests without the ARC-IM Therapy
Time Frame: 1 month, 6 months and 12 months post-therapy configuration
|
Measurement tool: blood pressure (mmHg) during supine position of orthostatic tilt test
|
1 month, 6 months and 12 months post-therapy configuration
|
|
MDS-sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part IB & II
Time Frame: 1 month, 6 months and 12 months post-therapy configuration
|
Participants' quality of life will be assessed with MDS-sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part IB & II to measure sleep, mental health, and fatigue (MDS-UPDRS-IB & II) over 20 items. Measurement tool: Total score (0 - 4 rating per question), 0 represents no impairment and 4 represents severe impairment. Higher total score indicates worse symptoms. |
1 month, 6 months and 12 months post-therapy configuration
|
|
King's Parkinson's Disease Pain Scale
Time Frame: 1 month, 6 months and 12 months post-therapy configuration
|
Participants' quality of life will be assessed with the 7-item King's Parkinson's Disease Pain Scale to characterize severity and types of pain associated with Parkinson's Disease. Measurement tool: Total score from 0 to 168. Lower score indicates a better outcome. |
1 month, 6 months and 12 months post-therapy configuration
|
|
Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39)
Time Frame: 1 month, 6 months and 12 months post-therapy configuration
|
Participants' quality of life will be measured by the 39 item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) to evaluate perceived health in terms of physical, mental and social functions. Measurement tool: Total score from 0-100, higher scores reflect lower quality of life |
1 month, 6 months and 12 months post-therapy configuration
|
|
Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson's disease - Autonomic Dysfunction
Time Frame: 1 month, 6 months and 12 months post-therapy configuration
|
Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson's disease - Autonomic Dysfunction (SCOPA-AUT) is a 25-item, self-completed questionnaire to evaluate autonomic symptoms in people with typical and atypical Parkinson's Disease. Measurement tool: Total score from 0-69 where a higher score indicates increased frequency of autonomic dysfunction symptoms |
1 month, 6 months and 12 months post-therapy configuration
|
|
MDS sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III
Time Frame: Baseline (before surgery), and 1 month, 6 months and 12 months post-therapy configuration
|
Participants' quality of life will be assessed with the MDS-sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III (19 items) to evaluate motor function. Measurement tool: Total score from 0 to 132. Low score means a better outcome. |
Baseline (before surgery), and 1 month, 6 months and 12 months post-therapy configuration
|
|
24 hour ambulatory measurements
Time Frame: Baseline (before surgery), and 1 month, 6 months and 12 months post-therapy configuration
|
Participant's quality of life will be evaluated with 24 hour blood pressure measurements with and without the therapy. Measurement tool: blood pressure (mmHg) |
Baseline (before surgery), and 1 month, 6 months and 12 months post-therapy configuration
|
|
Closed-loop stimulation on management of hemodynamics will be measured with the change in blood pressure during 10 minute, head up tilt tests.
Time Frame: Post-operative configuration phases, through year 1 of the study
|
Closed-loop stimulation will receive feedback from a blood pressure sensor to automatically adjust stimulation intensity.
We will evaluate the effects of this stimulation on management of hemodynamics during configuration sessions with pre-configured stimulations, with closed-loop stimulation and without stimulation.
The feasibility and effectiveness will be measured by the drop in blood pressure (mmHg) during 10 minute, orthostatic, head-up tilt tests.
|
Post-operative configuration phases, through year 1 of the study
|
|
Time Up and Go Test across different therapeutic conditions
Time Frame: Post-operative configuration phases, through year 1 of the study
|
The complementarity of the ARC-IM Therapy with standard therapies (e.g LDopa) will be assessed over the trajectory of therapy intake with and without stimulation during configuration phases with the Time Up and Go will measure time from sit to stand and gait quality. Measurement tool: time (sec) |
Post-operative configuration phases, through year 1 of the study
|
|
2 Minute Walk Test across different therapeutic conditions
Time Frame: Post-operative configuration phases, through year 1 of the study
|
The complementarity of the ARC-IM Therapy with standard therapies (e.g LDopa) will be assessed over the trajectory of therapy intake with and without stimulation during configuration phases with the The 2 Minute Walk Test (2MWT) will measure gait endurance and distance walked over 2 minutes. Measurement tool: distance (meters) |
Post-operative configuration phases, through year 1 of the study
|
|
Berg Balance Test across different therapeutic conditions
Time Frame: Post-operative configuration phases, through year 1 of the study
|
The complementarity of the ARC-IM Therapy with standard therapies (e.g LDopa) will be assessed over the trajectory of therapy intake with and without stimulation during configuration phases with the Berg Balance Test measures the ability to balance safely with 14 specific tasks performed while standing, sitting, or making simple movements. Measurement tool: Total score from 0-56, lower score indicates greater risk of losing your balance. |
Post-operative configuration phases, through year 1 of the study
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jocelyne Bloch, MD, CHUV
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Synucleinopathies
- Brain Diseases
- Central Nervous System Diseases
- Nervous System Diseases
- Vascular Diseases
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Movement Disorders
- Parkinsonian Disorders
- Basal Ganglia Diseases
- Primary Dysautonomias
- Autonomic Nervous System Diseases
- Orthostatic Intolerance
- Multiple System Atrophy
- Hypotension
- Parkinson Disease
- Shy-Drager Syndrome
- Hypotension, Orthostatic
- Pure Autonomic Failure
- Multiple system atrophy (MSA) with orthostatic hypotension
Other Study ID Numbers
- PD-HemON
- HT94252410901 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Department of Defense, USAMRAA)
- CDMRP-PD230100 (Other Grant/Funding Number: CDMRP-Proposal Log Number)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Parkinson's Disease
-
EicOsis Human Health Inc.University of California, Davis; Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's...RecruitingParkinson's Disease (PD)United States
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterNot yet recruitingParkinson's Disease (PD)United States
-
AbbVieRecruiting
-
University Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinUniversity of Kiel; University of Cologne; University Hospital, Bonn; Philipps...Not yet recruitingParkinson's Disease (PD)
-
InvicroMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCRecruitingParkinson's Disease | Parkinson's Disease (PD) | Parkinson's Disease (Disorder)United States
-
Ohio State UniversityCompletedParkinson's Disease | Parkinson Disease | Idiopathic Parkinson Disease | Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease | Parkinson Disease, Idiopathic | Parkinson's Disease, IdiopathicUnited States
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisFrance Parkinson AssociationUnknownHealthy Controls | Parkinson's Disease With LRRK2 Mutation | Parkinson's Disease Without LRRK2 MutationFrance
-
Guangzhou Henovcom Bioscience Co. Ltd.Frontage Clinical Services, Inc.Active, not recruitingParkinson's Disease (PD)United States
-
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfUniversity of TwenteRecruitingParkinson's Disease | Deep Brain StimulationGermany
-
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfUniversity of Oxford; University of TwenteRecruitingDeep Brain Stimulation | Parkinson's Disease (PD)Germany
Clinical Trials on ARC-IM Investigational System
-
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneRecruitingSpinal Cord InjuriesSwitzerland
-
ONWARD Medical, Inc.RecruitingSpinal Cord Injuries | Blood Pressure DisordersUnited States
-
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneRecruiting
-
ONWARD Medical, Inc.RecruitingOrthostatic Hypotension | Spinal Cord InjuryNetherlands
-
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneRecruitingChronic Spinal Cord Injury | Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) | Spinal Cord Injury | SCI - Spinal Cord Injury | SCI | Subacute Spinal Cord InjurySwitzerland
-
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical IncAbeona Therapeutics, IncEnrolling by invitationFollow-up Study of AAV-Mediated Gene Transfer (UX111; Previously Known as ABO-102) for MPS Type IIIASanfilippo Syndrome | MPS IIIA | Sanfilippo A | Mucopolysaccharidosis IIIAUnited States, Australia, Spain
-
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneNot yet recruiting
-
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneRecruitingSpinal Cord Injuries | ParaplegiaSwitzerland
-
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneRecruitingCervical Spinal Cord Injury | TetraplegiaSwitzerland
-
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneActive, not recruitingSpinal Cord InjuriesSwitzerland