Nutri-score Labelling in a UK Restaurant Setting: a Randomised Control Trial

February 18, 2026 updated by: Eric Robinson, University of Liverpool
An experiment exploring the perceived effectiveness of Nutri-score food labels with calorie labelling compared to calorie labelling only on food choice and consumption in a real-world setting

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

672

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Merseyside
      • Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom, L69 7ZA
        • University of Liverpool

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Can visit a restaurant in Liverpool city centre
  • Regularly eat food prepared out of the home (from restaurants, cafes, fast food etc., at least once a month)
  • Over the age of 18 years
  • Fluent English speaker

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant/breastfeeding
  • You have been diagnosed with a current or historic eating disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Restaurant 1
Restaurant 1: plant-based cafe
Participants will be given a restaurant's menu with calorie information or a menu with calorie information and NS labelling.
Active Comparator: Restaurant 2
Restaurant 2: University cafe
Participants will be given a restaurant's menu with calorie information or a menu with calorie information and NS labelling.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perceived Message Effectiveness
Time Frame: Up to 30 weeks
An adapted version of the University of North Carolina PME scale will be used to measure health concern, product attitude, and discouragement of item consumption in response to the food menu. Participants will be given the menu they ordered from to look at. All participants will answer 3 questions using a Likert scale ranging from 1 - 5 anchored by "not at all" and "a great deal". The mean response to the three items will be calculated. PME is used as an early indicator of a health message's potential to change behaviour (e.g., reduce selection of less healthy items). The scale has been used previously to identify the potential impact of food labels and is predictive of long-term behaviour.
Up to 30 weeks
Nutritional quality of each item and for the full meal
Time Frame: Up to 30 weeks

Nutritional quality for meal choices will be calculated using the UK NPM scoring system. This calculates a score (continuous variable) for a product by deducting a total score for positive nutrients from a total score for negative nutrients. A lower score represents greater nutritional quality and a higher score represents poorer nutritional quality.

We will calculate the mean NPM score weighted by energy content of items for each participant. This will ensure that the NPM score of main dishes will be weighted higher than that of starters or sides (assuming energy content of selected main is higher than any starters or sides), leading to a more representative overall NPM score for food orders. This will be done using the weighted.mean function in R. This function multiplies each value (i.e. NPM scores for individual items) by its corresponding weight (kcal content of individual items), sums all items and then divides this by the sum of the weights.

Up to 30 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
NS label of each item selected
Time Frame: Up to 30 weeks
A NS category value will be recorded for each item selected by participants (A,B,C,D,E)
Up to 30 weeks
Energy content of all food ordered
Time Frame: Up to 30 weeks
The sum of energy (kcal) across all foods ordered for the meal will be calculated
Up to 30 weeks
Energy and nutrients consumed
Time Frame: Up to 30 weeks

Researchers will take pictures of plates before and after each item is given to participants. Researchers will estimate the percentage of each dish consumed.

Participants will be asked whether they shared any of their meal with someone else and this will be taken into account when making percentage estimates. A random 10% of percentage estimates will be performed by a second researcher to measure reliability.

Energy and nutrient consumption will be calculated by multiplying the total energy/nutritional content of food items selected/consumed by the estimated proportion of the item consumed. Nutrients explored will be salt, sugar, fat, saturated fat, protein and fibre.

Up to 30 weeks
Later intake
Time Frame: Up to 30 weeks
The morning after participants take part in the study, they will be emailed with a link to complete a dietary recall survey (via intake 24, https://intake24.co.uk/). Participants will report everything they ate after the study session up until they went to bed. They will be asked to provide as much detail as possible on what they had for dinner, snacks, and drinks after the study session. We will estimate based on data from Intake 24, later consumption (kcal, salt, fat, saturated fat, sugar, protein, fibre).
Up to 30 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eric Robinson, University of Liverpool

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 27, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 26, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NS in the OOHFS study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Anonymised participant data will be placed on the Open Science Framework in case other researchers want to use in the future.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

IPD and supporting information will be available once the study is completed and published, with no end date.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The IPD and supporting information will be uploaded to the Open Science Framework where it will be openly available.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Food Labelling

Clinical Trials on menu labelling type

Subscribe