Increasing Availability of Lower Energy Meals vs. Menu Energy Labelling on Food Choice

April 6, 2020 updated by: Eric Robinson, University of Liverpool

Socioeconomic Position and the Impact of Increasing Availability of Lower Energy Meals vs. Menu Energy Labelling on Food Choice in Virtual Full-service Restaurants: Two Randomized Control Trials

Two randomized control trials examining human food choice (i.e. selection of high energy 'unhealthy' foods vs. selection of healthier foods). Interventions: In a between-subjects design, participants (recruitment stratified by socioeconomic position) made food choices (main dish, plus optional sides and desserts) in the absence vs. presence of menu energy labelling and from menus with baseline (10%) vs. increased availability (50%) of lower energy main dishes. Main outcome measures: Average energy content (kcal) of main dish chosen and average total energy content of all food ordered, including optional sides and desserts.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

See attached protocol documents.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2091

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Merseyside
      • Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom, L69 7ZA
        • University of Liverpool

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants were eligible to participate if they were US residents, aged of 18 or above, fluent in English, had access to a computer with an internet connection and had no dietary restrictions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • See above.

Stratification Criteria:

- We aimed to recruit a sample stratified by gender (approx. 50/50) and highest educational qualification (approx. 40% high school or less, 60% above high school) to be broadly representative of US adults.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Energy labelling
Energy labelling provided on restaurant menus
Restaurant menus are altered to accommodate energy labelling intervention
NO_INTERVENTION: No energy labelling
No energy labelling provided on restaurant menus
EXPERIMENTAL: Increased availability of lower energy meals
Higher proportion of meals are 600kcals or less
Restaurant menus are altered to accommodate energy labelling intervention
Restaurant menus are altered to include more lower energy options
NO_INTERVENTION: Baseline availability of lower energy meals
Proportion of meals that are 600kcals or less at baseline level

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Energy ordered from main menu
Time Frame: 15-20 minutes (the time frame denotes time taken to make the menu order and there is no follow up
Total kcal content of main menu order
15-20 minutes (the time frame denotes time taken to make the menu order and there is no follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total energy ordered
Time Frame: 15-20 minutes (the time frame denotes time taken to make the menu order and there is no follow up
Total kcal content of all food ordered (including sides, desserts)
15-20 minutes (the time frame denotes time taken to make the menu order and there is no follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 30, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 2, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 7, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 7, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 803194 1B2

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Shared on the Open Science Framework

IPD Sharing Time Frame

On publication, indefinitely

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Open website

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Menu configuration (presence of energy labelling)

Subscribe