Acellular Dermal Matrix vs Autologous Tarsus for Correction of Lower Eyelid Retraction

April 14, 2025 updated by: Haukeland University Hospital

Prospective Comparison of Acellular Dermal Matrix and Autologous Tarsus for Correction of Lower Eyelid Retraction

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of two promising implants in treatment of lower eyelid retraction in 40 patients. This condition often resulting from injury, surgical complications, or thyroid eye disease. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Which implant provides better long-term stability of the eyelid malposition?

Does one implant minimize complications and improve patient outcomes more effectively than the other?

This study will compare the use of donor sclera implants to a cellular dermal matrix to see if either offers superior results in terms of reducing graft shrinkage and improving eyelid positioning.

Participants will:

Undergo lower eyelid reconstruction surgery with one of the two implants.

Be monitored for postoperative outcomes, including eyelid position, recurrence rates, and complications over a follow-up period 6 months.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study aims to find the best way to surgically correct lower eyelid retraction, a condition where the lower eyelid droops, leading to eye dryness, irritation, and potential vision problems. This condition can arise from various causes like thyroid eye disease, complications from eyelid or eye socket surgeries, burns, or injuries. The goal of the study is to determine which "spacer" graft works best to lift the eyelid back into its correct position and provide long-lasting results.

Currently, there's no universally agreed-upon optimal spacer-graft for this condition. Surgeons at the department of Ophthalmology at Haukeland University Hospital are conducting a study to compare two promising spacer graft materials: acellular dermal matrix (Permacol), a processed tissue that encourages tissue regeneration, and autologous tarsus, tissue taken from the patient's own upper eyelid.

Forty patients needing surgery for lower eyelid retraction will be inculded in this study. They will be randomly assigned to receive either the Permacol graft or the autologous tarsus graft. The surgical procedure involves making an incision inside the lower eyelid, separating the retractors (muscles that pull the eyelid down), and inserting the chosen spacer graft between the tarsus (the eyelid's supporting structure) and the retractors. This lifts the eyelid to the correct position.

Patients will be followed up for six months after surgery. Doctors will measure the position of the eyelid, how well the eye closes, and signs of dryness or damage to the eye surface. Patients will also be asked about pain/discomfort, and satisfaction with the cosmetic outcome. The study will track any complications, such as infection or recurrence of the eyelid retraction.

The study will compare the two groups to see which graft provides better eyelid positioning, reduces symptoms, and has fewer complications. Statistical analysis will be used to determine if there are significant differences between the two treatment groups.

The results of this study will provide valuable information for surgeons treating lower eyelid retraction, helping them choose the most effective and safe graft material for their patients. The procedures will be performed by experienced surgeons at Haukeland University Hospital, ensuring patient safety. The study adheres to ethical guidelines, and patients will provide informed consent before participating.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients aged 18-75 years.
  • Grade 2 or higher lower eyelid retraction (according to the retraction grading scale).
  • Candidate for surgical correction due to functional or cosmetic reasons.
  • Willingness to participate and provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active ocular or eyelid infection.
  • History of severe scarring or keloid formation.
  • Concurrent orbital or eyelid malignancies. Pregnancy or lactation. Uncontrolled systemic diseases (e.g., diabetes, immune disorders). Previous eyelid surgery on the affected eye.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Autologous tarsus
Surgical implantation to elongate the lower eyelid
Surgical implantation of autologous tarsus to the lower eyelid
Active Comparator: A cellular dermal matrix (Permacol)
Surgical implantation to elongate the lower eyelid
Surgical implantation of acellular dermal matrix to the lower eyelid

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Medial reflex distance 2
Time Frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up.
Number of patients with ≥ 1 mm reduction in medial reflex distance 2
From baseline to 6 months follow-up.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Vertical eyelid aperture
Time Frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up.
Number of patients with ≥ 1 mm reduction in vertical eyelid aperture
From baseline to 6 months follow-up.
Scleral show
Time Frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up.

Number of patients with ≥ 1 mm reduction in scleral show

.

From baseline to 6 months follow-up.
Lagophthalmos
Time Frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up.

Number of patients with ≥ 1 mm reduction in lagophthalmos

.

From baseline to 6 months follow-up.
Oxford staining scale
Time Frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up.

Number of patients with ≥ 1 reduction in Oxford staining scale (objective assessment of keratopathy). Oxford staining scale range from 0-4, and a higher score mean a worse outcome.

.

From baseline to 6 months follow-up.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hans Olav Ueland, MD, PhD, Haukeland University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2032

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 11, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 14, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 863946

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be shared outside the study group because concent is not obtained to share personal data.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lower Eyelid Retraction

Clinical Trials on Autologous tarsus

Subscribe