AZA+Lus VS AZA Monotherapy in HR-MDS

April 13, 2025 updated by: Bing Han, Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Azacitidine Plus Luspatercept Versus Azacitidine Monotherapy in Higher-risk Myelodysplastic Neoplasms: a Randomized Prospective Study

This study is a randomized, prospective, single-center, open-label cohort study involving untreated HR-MDS patients. The patients were divided randomized into AZA+Lus cohort and AZA monotherapy cohort.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

The hypomethylating agents (HMA) azacitidine (AZA) and decitabine (DEC) have been shown to improve survival and delay disease progression in patients with high-risk MDS. They are recommended by the NCCN as first-line treatments for patients with high-risk MDS. Clinical trials have demonstrated an OR rate of approximately 40-50% with AZA in patients with high-risk MDS. Despite the efficacy of HMA therapy, the rate of transfusion independence remains low. Anemia remains the most prominent symptom in refractory patients, with very limited options for subsequent treatment. Prolonged anemia affects every organ function and seriously affects the prognosis of patients.

Luspatercept is currently approved for the treatment of patients with both erythropoiesis receptor agonist ( ESA) treatment failures in transfusion-dependent low-risk MDS-RS patients. In a randomized controlled phase III clinical trial, compared to a placebo group, luspatercept significantly improved transfusion dependence and improved hemoglobin and quality of life in refractory MDS-RS patients. A recent conference report suggested that there was no significant difference in efficacy between low-risk and high-risk patients treated with luspatercept and that the HI rate for high-risk patients treated with luspatercept monotherapy was approximately 50%.

Thus this study aimed to compare the efficacy of AZA+luspatercept and AZA monotherapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

86

Phase

  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years old
  • Diagnosed as higher-risk MDS (IPSS intermediate-2/high-risk, or IPSS-R >3.5, or IPSS-M moderate high-, high-, very high-risk)
  • Untreated patients
  • Liver and kidney function less than 2 times of upper limit of normal
  • ECOG≤2 and expected survival more than 6 months
  • Informed consent signed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • With active infection
  • Other malignant tumors
  • Obvious abnormal liver and kidney function, or abnormal function of other organs
  • Combined with myelofibrosis
  • Have undergone bone marrow transplantation
  • Pregnant or lactating women, or men who have recent reproductive needs
  • Allergic to azacytidine, Rotercept or excipients
  • History of polysorbate 80 allergy
  • Refuse to sign informed consent
  • Researchers consider it inappropriate to participate in the experiment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Azacitidine+Luspatercept
Azacitidine 75mg/m/ day *5 days, 28 days for 1 course
Luspatercept 1.0 mg/kg subcutaneously every 3 weeks, adjusted according to hemoglobin, up to 1.75mg/kg. If hemoglobin ≥120g/L, luspatercept can be discontinued.
Active Comparator: Azacitidine
Azacitidine 75mg/m/ day *5 days, 28 days for 1 course

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
overall response rate
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months
3 months, 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
overall survival
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
through study completion, an average of 1 year
complete response rate
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months
3 months, 6 months
rate of transfusion independence
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months
3 months, 6 months
adverse event rate
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
through study completion, an average of 1 year
relapse rate
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
through study completion, an average of 1 year
progress-free survival
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Higher-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Azacitidine (AZA)

Subscribe