VR-based Physical Activity and Reminiscence Therapy

May 18, 2025 updated by: GE LIN KAN, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

Active Physical Activity - Virtual Reality Cognitive Therapy

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if active Physical activity + virtual reality cognitive therapy (aPAVRCT) works to slow the progression of AD cognitive decline in older adults. It will also learn about the physical effects and mental effects of the aPAVRCT. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does aPAVRCT slow the progression of AD cognitive decline? (e.g., HK-MoCA, ADAS-Cog) Does aPAVRCT improve physical function? (e.g., ADL) Does aPAVRCT improve mental health? (e.g., GDS-15, PANAS) Does aPAVRCT improve life satisfaction? Does aPAVRCT improve other cognitive or physical capacities? What issues and benefits do participants and stakeholders (e.g., families, caregivers, managers) have when taking aPAVRCT? (e.g., NPI-Q) Researchers will compare the intervention group (aPAVRCT) to a control group (rehabilitation bike) to see if aPAVRCT works to slow the progression of AD in cognitive decline.

Participants will:

Take aPAVRCT (interventional group) or usual physical acitvity (control group) at least twice a week, 15 minutes for each session, for 12-16 weeks Physiotherapies (assistants) and care professionals will do the intervention, research group will operate, observe, and assist the experiment.

All the experiment processes will be recorded. Visit the sites everyday for checkups and tests Keep a diary of their symptoms, the number of times, and any essential information

Sites: around 3-5 nursing homes, under one institution. Inclusion criteria: older adults in the setting who have the ability to pedal a rehabilitation bike.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of study is to investigate the effect of active Physical activity + virtual reality cognitive therapy (aPAVRCT) on cognitive function in older adults with Alzheimer's Dementia and related dementias. The investigator hypothesizes the "Physical activity + virtual environment brain stimulations' would slow the process of AD cognitive decline. The life satisfaction score in the intervention group would be higher than that of the control group.

The investigator will conduct measurements on three aspects: The Chinese version of the MoCA, physical functions, and emotional changes. Data will be collected at baseline, 4-week, 8-week, 12-week after interventions for the two groups, and a follow-up measurement. In addition, the investigator will use some qualitative methods, such as focus group, interview, observation, during and after the first 3-month intervention to identify some issues during the intervention and to probe caregivers. The investigator will use both the Ttest between the two groups (to compare cognitive decline progressions, and life satisfaction) and mixed methods to illustrate life satisfaction, especially among caregivers.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • older adults in the setting who have the ability to pedal the rehabilitation bike

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals self-reporting or identified by stakeholders as unwilling or unsuitable to participate.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental
  • We offered a system integrated with an indoor bike (for physical activity) and a multisensory VR environment (for cognitive training, such as reminiscence).
  • Participants will actively navigate the virtual environment by pedaling and steering the handlebar.
  • Care professionals will deliver the intervention using this system.
No Intervention: control
usual care (PA)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hong Kong - Montreal cognitive assessment scale
Time Frame: at the baseline, during intervention (4-week, 8-week, 12-week, 16-week), and post-intervention assessment (3 months, 6 months after the intervention)
MoCA is a cognitive assessment method for dementia, particularly mild stages of cognitive impairment. (range, 0-30, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment)
at the baseline, during intervention (4-week, 8-week, 12-week, 16-week), and post-intervention assessment (3 months, 6 months after the intervention)
The Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS)
Time Frame: at the baseline, during intervention (4-week, 8-week, 12-week, 16-week), and post-intervention assessment (3 months, 6 months after the intervention)
iADRS (range, 0-144, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive and functional described impairment) is to assess both cognitive and physical functions for dementia, combines the 13-item cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-Cog13 ), the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-iADL).
at the baseline, during intervention (4-week, 8-week, 12-week, 16-week), and post-intervention assessment (3 months, 6 months after the intervention)
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Time Frame: at the baseline, during intervention (4-week, 8-week, 12-week, 16-week), and post-intervention assessment (3 months, 6 months after the intervention)
For cognitive assessment, (range: 0-144, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment)
at the baseline, during intervention (4-week, 8-week, 12-week, 16-week), and post-intervention assessment (3 months, 6 months after the intervention)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time up and Go Test
Time Frame: at the baseline, during intervention (4-week, 8-week, 12-week, 16-week), and post-intervention assessment (3 months, 6 months after the intervention)
TUG test evaluates fall risk, mobility and physical performance in the elderly
at the baseline, during intervention (4-week, 8-week, 12-week, 16-week), and post-intervention assessment (3 months, 6 months after the intervention)
Sit to Stand Test
Time Frame: at the baseline, during intervention (4-week, 8-week, 12-week, 16-week), and post-intervention assessment (3 months, 6 months after the intervention)
sit to stand test is a test that evaluates the functional strength of the lower extremity, balance and fall risk.
at the baseline, during intervention (4-week, 8-week, 12-week, 16-week), and post-intervention assessment (3 months, 6 months after the intervention)
Geriatric depression scale (GDS-15)
Time Frame: at the baseline, during intervention (4-week, 8-week, 12-week, 16-week), and post-intervention assessment (3 months, 6 months after the intervention)
Geriatric depression scale identifies possible depression in older adults. Range: 0-15, with higher scores indicating greater possible depression.
at the baseline, during intervention (4-week, 8-week, 12-week, 16-week), and post-intervention assessment (3 months, 6 months after the intervention)
The Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD)
Time Frame: at the baseline, during intervention (4-week, 8-week, 12-week, 16-week), and post-intervention assessment (3 months, 6 months after the intervention)
CSDD is to assess changes in a person's mood, behaviours and routines which may be symptoms of depression. Range: 0-38, with higher scores indicating greater depression symptoms
at the baseline, during intervention (4-week, 8-week, 12-week, 16-week), and post-intervention assessment (3 months, 6 months after the intervention)
Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Questionnaire (NPI-Q)
Time Frame: at the baseline, during intervention (4-week, 8-week, 12-week, 16-week), and post-intervention assessment (3 months, 6 months after the intervention)
NPI-Q is to interview informant for symptom severity and caregiver distress. Range: 0-36, higher score indicates greater neuropsychiatric disturbances or caregiver distress.
at the baseline, during intervention (4-week, 8-week, 12-week, 16-week), and post-intervention assessment (3 months, 6 months after the intervention)
Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scale
Time Frame: at the baseline, during intervention (4-week, 8-week, 12-week, 16-week), and post-intervention assessment (3 months, 6 months after the intervention)
PANAS is used to assess positive and negative emotional status and changes. This self-report questionnaire consists of two 10-item scales to measure positive and negative. The total score is calculated by finding the sum of the 10 positive items, and then the 10 negative items. Scores range from 10 - 50 for both sets of items. For the total positive score, a higher score indicates more of a positive affect. For the total negative score, a lower score indicates less of a negative affect.
at the baseline, during intervention (4-week, 8-week, 12-week, 16-week), and post-intervention assessment (3 months, 6 months after the intervention)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 19, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 15, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 15, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HREP20220139
  • FS110 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Hong Kong University of Science and Technology)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Physical Activity

Subscribe