Efficacy of Mavacamten in Patients With Symptomatic Latent Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

April 20, 2025 updated by: Xu Liu

Efficacy of Mavacamten in Patients With Symptomatic Latent Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Mavacamten compared to no treatment in patients with symptomatic latent obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The trial was randomized into two groups: Mavacamten group and Non-Mavacamten group. Over the 30-week treatment period, patients underwent a series of assessments at predefined time points, including transthoracic echocardiography, electrocardiogram (ECG), Holter monitoring, NYHA functional classification, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), and cardiac biomarkers.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

78

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Shanghai, China
        • Shanghai Chest Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥18 years.
  2. Weight greater than 45 kg.
  3. Adequate acoustic windows to allow for accurate transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs).
  4. Diagnosis of latent obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, in accordance with the current guidelines of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association, European Society of Cardiology, and Chinese Society of Cardiology.
  5. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥55% at rest, confirmed by the echocardiography core laboratory.
  6. New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II or III symptoms at the time of screening.
  7. Resting oxygen saturation ≥90% at the time of screening.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any acute or severe comorbidities (e.g., severe infections or hematological, renal, metabolic, gastrointestinal, or endocrine dysfunction).
  2. Currently using or having used prohibited medications within 14 days prior to screening, such as cytochrome CYP2C19 inhibitors (e.g., omeprazole or esomeprazole) or strong CYP3A4 inhibitors.
  3. Life expectancy of less than 1 year.
  4. Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  5. History of syncope or sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia during exercise within the past 6 months.
  6. Atrial fibrillation (AF).
  7. Patients currently receiving or planning to receive treatment with disopyramide, cibenzoline, ranolazine, or a combination of beta-blockers with verapamil or diltiazem.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mavacamten Group
Patients in this group were treated with Mavacamten, starting at an initial dose of 2.5 mg, administered orally once daily. Subsequent doses were adjusted based on changes in pressure gradients and cardiac function observed during follow-up.
Patients in this group were treated with Mavacamten, starting at an initial dose of 2.5 mg, administered orally once daily. Subsequent doses were adjusted based on changes in pressure gradients and cardiac function observed during follow-up.
No Intervention: Control Group
Patients in this group did not receive Mavacamten treatment and were instead managed with traditional therapies of their choice, such as beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The change in peak left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient
Time Frame: From baseline to week 30.
The change in peak left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient, determined by Doppler echocardiography, during exercise or pharmacologic provocation from baseline to week 30.
From baseline to week 30.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The proportion of patients with a peak left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient of less than 30 mmHg.
Time Frame: At week 30.
The proportion of patients with a peak left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient of less than 30 mmHg during exercise or pharmacologic provocation at week 30.
At week 30.
The proportion of patients with a peak left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient of less than 50 mmHg.
Time Frame: At week 30.
The proportion of patients with a peak left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient of less than 50 mmHg during exercise or pharmacologic provocation at week 30.
At week 30.
The proportion of patients with at least a one-class improvement in NYHA functional classification.
Time Frame: At week 30.
The proportion of patients with at least a one-class improvement in NYHA functional classification at week 30.
At week 30.
The change in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS).
Time Frame: From baseline to week 30.
The change in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS) from baseline to week 30.
From baseline to week 30.
The change in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels.
Time Frame: From baseline to week 30.
The change in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels from baseline to week 30.
From baseline to week 30.
The change in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) levels.
Time Frame: From baseline to week 30.
The change in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) levels from baseline to week 30.
From baseline to week 30.
Key safety endpoints
Time Frame: From baseline to week 30.
Key safety endpoints include the incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
From baseline to week 30.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 20, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HCM - Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Clinical Trials on mavacamten

Subscribe