- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06950268
Randomized Trial of Active vs Passive Splinting for Extensor Tendon Injuries in Zones IV to VI
April 22, 2025 updated by: Fundacin Biomedica Galicia Sur
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Active and Passive Motion Splint Immobilization for the Treatment of Extensor Tendon Injuries in Zones IV to VI of the Hand
This study compares two methods of post-operative immobilization after surgical repair (tenorrhaphy) of extensor tendons in the fingers.
Patients were randomly assigned to receive either a standard plaster splint or an alternative splinting method that allows controlled finger movement (ICAMS).
The main goal was to determine which method leads to better recovery in terms of finger mobility, grip strength, pain, and patient comfort.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Extensor tendon injuries of the hand are commonly treated with immobilization for 4-6 weeks using a plaster splint in the intrinsic plus position.
However, prolonged immobilization may lead to tendon adhesions, joint stiffness, and delayed return to function.
This randomized controlled clinical trial evaluated the efficacy of an immediate controlled active motion splinting protocol (ICAMS) compared to classic immobilization (CI) following extensor tendon tenorrhaphy in zones IV, V, and VI.
Thirty patients were randomly assigned to either group.
Functional outcomes were assessed at 4 and 6 weeks post-injury, including grip strength, joint range of motion, pain (VAS), Quick-DASH score, and patient satisfaction.
The ICAMS group showed significantly better results in all main functional parameters.
These findings support the use of early active motion protocols in selected cases of extensor tendon injury to enhance recovery and patient comfort.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
30
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Pontevedra
-
Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain, 36312
- CHUVI Hospital (Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo)
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults aged 18 years or older
- Patients from the CHUVI Health Area
- Diagnosed with an acute, single, complete extensor tendon laceration in zones IV, V, or VI of the long fingers
- Treated with primary tenorrhaphy
- Provided signed informed consent
- Agreed to attend follow-up visits and comply with the study protocol
Exclusion Criteria:
- More than one extensor tendon laceration in the same hand
- Injuries involving the thumb
- Tendon injuries with loss of substance
- Associated injuries at the same level (e.g., bone fracture, nerve lesion)
- Patients with cognitive impairment or inability to follow the protocol
- Presence of other injuries or medical conditions that could interfere with assessment
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: ICAMS Group
Participants received immediate controlled active motion splinting (ICAMS) after extensor tendon tenorrhaphy.
The ICAMS protocol included a daytime yoke splint, which maintained the injured finger in 20° more extension than adjacent fingers, and a nocturnal intrinsic plus static splint.
The protocol was maintained for 4 weeks post-surgery
|
The ICAMS protocol consisted of a daytime yoke splint maintaining the injured finger in 20° more extension than adjacent fingers, combined with a nocturnal static splint in the intrinsic plus position.
The splinting was applied for 4 weeks following extensor tendon tenorrhaphy.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Classic Immobilization Group
Participants received standard immobilization with a plaster splint in the intrinsic plus position following extensor tendon tenorrhaphy.
The immobilization was maintained continuously for 4 weeks.
|
Participants received a classic plaster splint in the intrinsic plus position worn continuously for 4 weeks following extensor tendon tenorrhaphy.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Grip Strength of the Injured Hand
Time Frame: 4 and 6 weeks after injury
|
Grip strength was measured using a JAMAR manual dynamometer to evaluate functional recovery after extensor tendon tenorrhaphy.
Measurements were taken at 4 and 6 weeks post-injury.
|
4 and 6 weeks after injury
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in MCP Joint Flexion
Time Frame: 4 and 6 weeks after injury
|
Active flexion of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints of the injured finger was measured to assess recovery of joint mobility.
|
4 and 6 weeks after injury
|
|
Pain Intensity (VAS Score)
Time Frame: 4 and 6 weeks after injury
|
Pain was evaluated using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at both follow-up visits.
|
4 and 6 weeks after injury
|
|
Quick-DASH Score
Time Frame: 4 and 6 weeks after injury
|
Upper limb disability and function were assessed using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick-DASH) questionnaire.
|
4 and 6 weeks after injury
|
|
Patient Comfort With Immobilization
Time Frame: 4 and 6 weeks after injury
|
Patients rated their comfort with the splint using a yes/no response at 4 weeks post-treatment.
|
4 and 6 weeks after injury
|
|
Patient Satisfaction With Treatment Outcome
Time Frame: 4 and 6 weeks after injury
|
Patients reported overall satisfaction with the treatment using a yes/no response.
|
4 and 6 weeks after injury
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Miguel Cela-López, MD, Sergas
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
July 1, 2020
Primary Completion (Actual)
August 25, 2021
Study Completion (Actual)
August 30, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 22, 2025
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 22, 2025
First Posted (Actual)
April 30, 2025
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 30, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 22, 2025
Last Verified
April 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2020/307
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Tendon Injuries
-
Zimmer BiometEmbody Inc.Active, not recruiting
-
Vastra Gotaland RegionCapio Group; ATLEVA FotcenterRecruitingTendon Injuries | Surgery | Tendon Rupture | Tendon TearSweden
-
Aarhus University HospitalEnrolling by invitationAchilles Tendon Rupture | Achilles Tendon InjuryDenmark
-
Aristotle University Of ThessalonikiGeneral Hospital of Naoussa; Private Orthopedics Practice P. SymeonidisEnrolling by invitationAchilles Tendon Rupture | Achilles Tendon Injury | Achilles Tendon SurgeryGreece
-
University of ZurichCompleted
-
University of FloridaRecruitingProspective Randomized Blinded Trial of VersaWrap Tendon Protector for Zone 2 Flexor Tendon InjuriesFlexor TendonUnited States
-
Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la...Recruiting
-
Research SourceEnrolling by invitation
-
Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SwedenCompletedTendon Injury - HandSweden
-
Cairo UniversityRecruitingHand Tendon InjuryEgypt
Clinical Trials on ICAMS Splinting Protocol
-
Hand Therapy BarcelonaRecruitingSplints | Hand Injuries | Muscle TearSpain
-
Denver Health and Hospital AuthorityCompletedTibia FractureUnited States
-
University of FloridaNational Institute on Aging (NIA)Completed
-
Advanced Centers for Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports...Dynasplint Systems, Inc.Unknown
-
Tampere University HospitalMikkeli Central Hospital; Terveystalo; Hospital Nova of Central FinlandRecruitingCarpal Tunnel SyndromeFinland
-
Thomas Jefferson UniversityUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore; The Craig H. Neilsen FoundationCompleted
-
Christine M. Kleinert Institute for Hand and MicrosurgeryUnknownCarpal Tunnel SyndromeUnited States
-
Imperial College LondonNational Institute for Health Research, United KingdomCompleted
-
National Health Service, United KingdomUniversity of BradfordCompletedVolar Plate Injury of the Proximal Interphalangeal JointUnited Kingdom
-
Al Hayah University In CairoRecruitingDistal Radius FracturesEgypt