Electrotherapy Stimulation Together With Life Coaching for the Support of Burnout Symptoms in Healthcare Workers

June 8, 2026 updated by: Roswell Park Cancer Institute

A Pilot Study Using a Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation (CES) Device in Conjunction With Life Coaching to Alleviate Burnout Symptoms in HealthCare Workers (HCWs)

This clinical trial evaluates the effect of life coaching together with Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation (CES) as an intervention to decrease self-reported symptoms of burnout, moral distress, resilience, and employee retention in oncology healthcare workers. Burnout and moral distress are occupational hazards for oncology healthcare workers. Emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and lack of personal accomplishment at work are symptoms of burnout. Moral distress may be defined as knowing the right thing to do but being unable to do so based upon internal or external constraints. The device is attached to the earlobes that uses cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) at a microcurrent to alleviate symptoms of anxiety, insomnia, pain, and possibly depression. Life coaching is partnering with clients in a thought-provoking and creative process that inspires them to maximize their personal and professional potential and can increase resiliency skills such as boundary setting and prioritizing, increases in self-compassion and self-care, and potentially indirectly positively impact patient care. Undergoing the use of CES via the CES device, coupled with life coaching, may help alleviate burnout symptoms and moral distress in oncology healthcare workers.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To determine the efficacy of using Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation (CES) with group life coaching sessions as an intervention to decrease healthcare worker self-reported symptoms of burnout and moral distress.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To determine the efficacy of using Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation (CES) with group life coaching sessions as a supportive intervention to increase healthcare worker self-reported ratings of resilience, and employment retention (Organizational Wellbeing Assessment - Retention [OWA-R]).

OUTLINE: Participants are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: During weeks 1-6, participants use the CES device once daily (QD) over 1 hour 5 days per week for 6 weeks on study. Participants also participate in virtual group life coaching sessions and discussions and view video assignments 3 times during weeks 1, 3, and 6. At week 7, participants exchange device for second device. During weeks 8-13, participants cross-over and use the sham device QD over 1 hour 5 days per week for 6 weeks on study.

ARM II: During weeks 1-6, participants use the sham device QD over 1 hour 5 days per week for 6 weeks on study. Participants also participate in virtual group life coaching sessions and discussions and view video assignments 3 times during weeks 1, 3, and 6. At week 7, participants exchange device for second device. During weeks 8-13, participants cross-over and use the CES device QD over 1 hour 5 days per week for 6 weeks on study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Buffalo, New York, United States, 14263
        • Recruiting
        • Roswell Park Cancer Institute
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Amy Gallagher

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 21 ≤ and ≤ 75 years old
  • Patient-facing healthcare workers (e.g., medical doctor, advanced practice provider, nurse)
  • Experiencing symptoms of burnout, as defined by a score of 1, 2, or 3 on question #2 of the Mini-Z II Survey
  • Working on the Buffalo-Niagara Medical Campus (e.g. Roswell Park, Oishei Children's Hospital, Buffalo General, etc.)
  • Ability to attend three (3) in-person appointments, one (1) hour in duration, at Roswell Park at week 1, week 6 and week 12 corresponding to the initial, midpoint, and final assessments
  • Ability to use the CES daily for an hour each day

    • Although the device is water-resistant, participants must agree to not use the device in the bath or shower
  • Ability to read and write in English
  • Participant has access to a computer with internet access and an email address

    • Ability to attend three (3) virtual 60-minute group life coaching sessions, via Zoom
    • Ability to complete three (3) 10-15-minute pre-recorded video assignments, which will be distributed via email (each assignment will be due by the end of the week that they are distributed)
  • Participant must understand the investigational nature of this study and sign an Independent Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board approved written informed consent form prior to receiving any study related procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who self-report as pregnant or nursing. Pregnancy be verified with a urine test for all persons of childbearing potential with a uterus
  • Subjects with a self-reported history of the following: Meniere's disease, history of vertigo or prone to dizziness, seizure disorder, pacemaker / implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator [AICD]), cochlear implant, or any implanted electrical devices that cannot be shut off
  • Inability to tolerate the required minimum stimulation amplitude (200 uA) during the initial device training at the baseline visit.
  • Any self-reported medical or psychiatric condition which in the PI or study physician's opinion deems the participant an unsuitable candidate to participate in this trial.
  • Unwilling or unable to follow protocol requirements

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm I (Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation (CES) + life coaching)
During weeks 1-6, participants use the CES device QD over 1 hour 5 days per week for 6 weeks on study. Participants also participate in virtual group life coaching sessions and discussions and view video assignments 3 times during weeks 1, 3, and 6. At week 7 participants will return their devices and receive their second device . During weeks 8-13 participants cross-over and use the sham device QD over 1 hour 5 days per week for 6 weeks on study.
Ancillary studies
Participate in discussions
Other Names:
  • Discuss
Undergo coaching sessions
View video assignments
Sham Comparator: Arm II (Sham device + life coaching sessions)
During weeks 1-6, participants use the sham device QD over 1 hour 5 days per week for 6 weeks on study. Participants also participate in virtual group life coaching sessions and discussions and view video assignments 3 times during weeks 1, 3, and 6. At week 7, participants return their device and receive their second device. During weeks 8-13, participants cross-over and use the CES device QD over 1 hour 5 days per week for 6 weeks on study.
Ancillary studies
Participate in discussions
Other Names:
  • Discuss
Undergo coaching sessions
View video assignments
Undergo sham intervention
Other Names:
  • Sham Comparator
Use CES device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Symptoms of burnout in healthcare workers (HCWs)
Time Frame: At baseline, 6 weeks, and 13 weeks
Will be assessed using the Mini-Z Survey. Will be summarized by study arm and time-point (baseline, midpoint, and follow-up) using the appropriate descriptive statistics, and graphically using mean or dot plots. The Mini-Z scores will be modeled as a function of study arm, time-point, their two-way interaction, and random cohort and subject (nested within cohort) effects using linear mixed models (LMMs).
At baseline, 6 weeks, and 13 weeks
Symptoms of moral distress in HCWs
Time Frame: At baseline, 6 weeks, and 13 weeks
Will be assessed using the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Workers (MMDHW). Will be summarized by study arm and time-point (baseline, midpoint, and follow-up) using the appropriate descriptive statistics, and graphically using mean or dot plots. The MMDHW scores will be modeled as a function of study arm, time-point, their two-way interaction, and random cohort and subject (nested within cohort) effects using LMMs.
At baseline, 6 weeks, and 13 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-reported resilience in HCWs
Time Frame: At baseline, 6 weeks, and 13 weeks
Measure of resilience will be assessed using the Brief Resilient Coping Scale. Will be summarized by study arm and time-point (baseline and follow-up) using the appropriate descriptive statistics, and graphically using mean or dot plots. Will be modeled as a function of study arm, time-point, their two-way interaction, and random cohort and subject (nested within cohort) effects using LMMs.
At baseline, 6 weeks, and 13 weeks
HCW self-reported probability of employment retention
Time Frame: At baseline, 6 weeks, and 13 weeks
Likelihood of employment retention will be assessed using the Organizational Wellbeing Assessment - Retention. Will be summarized by study arm and time-point (baseline and follow-up) using the appropriate descriptive statistics, and graphically using mean or dot plots. Will be modeled as a function of study arm, time-point, their two-way interaction, and random cohort and subject (nested within cohort) effects using LMMs.
At baseline, 6 weeks, and 13 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amy Gallagher, PsyD, Roswell Park Cancer Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 15, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • I-3956824 (Other Identifier: Roswell Park Cancer Institute)
  • NCI-2025-03017 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psychiatric Disorder

Clinical Trials on Survey Administration

Subscribe