A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of an Implantable Wireless Brain-Computer Interface(BCI)System NEO in Patients With Tetraplegia (NEO)

A Prospective, Multi-Center Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of an Implantable Wireless Brain-Computer Interface(BCI)System NEO in Patients With Tetraplegia

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a Minimally Invasive Wireless Implantable Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) System NEO in patients with tetraplegia and to provide a basis for product registration.

Through brain-computer interface alternative technology, patients can control the external equipment with brain signals to improve the patient's quality of life.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100053
        • Xuanwu Hospital,Capital Medical University
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Guoguang Zhao, Ph.D
        • Contact:
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200040
        • Huashan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ying Mao, Ph.D

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age between 18 and 65 years old, no restriction on gender.
  2. Tetraplegia caused by cervical spinal cord injury.
  3. Score of ≤1 on either the ball grasp or water pouring tasks of the ARAT (Action Research Arm Test).
  4. Muscle strength of finger flexors < grade 3 according to ISNCSCI (International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury).
  5. Score of ≥2 for "hand to mouth" on ARAT; scores of ≥1 for both "hand to top of head" and "hand to behind the head."
  6. Neurological assessment indicates normal function of the motor-related cortex, with no significant structural lesions or functional disorders identified.
  7. Diagnosis confirmed for at least 12 months, with a stable condition for at least 6 months following standard treatment.
  8. Normal cognitive function, good compliance, and voluntarily agrees to participate in the clinical trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Without the consent of the patient or the patient's legal guardian.
  2. Presence of syringomyelia, severe neuropathic pain, or severe spasticity that limits the participant's ability to engage in training.
  3. Requires ventilator support.
  4. Baclofen dosage >30 mg/day.
  5. Received botulinum toxin injections in the upper limb, neck, or hand within 6 months prior to enrollment, or received stem cell therapy within 1 year.
  6. High risk of surgical complications, such as active systemic infection, coagulation disorders (e.g., receiving anticoagulant therapy), or platelet count below 50,000.
  7. Patients who have already been implanted with medical devices that deliver electrical energy to the central nervous system.
  8. Any unstable or significant medical condition that may interfere with study procedures or confound the evaluation of study endpoints, such as depression, mood disorders, or other cognitive impairments.
  9. Diagnosed with severe, unstable, and uncontrolled complex regional pain syndrome.
  10. Autoimmune-mediated spinal cord dysfunction/injury.
  11. History of other neurological disorders, such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain injury, or drug-resistant epilepsy.
  12. Peripheral neuropathies (e.g. diabetic polyneuropathy, compressive neuropathies).
  13. In the investigator's opinion, the study is unsafe or inappropriate for the participant, or the participant is unlikely to comply with the study follow-up schedule.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment group
a Minimally Invasive Wireless Implantable Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) System NEO
a Minimally Invasive Wireless Implantable Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) System NEO

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
BCI-assisted ARAT grasp response rate
Time Frame: 3 months post-operation
At 3 months post-operation, the investigator will assess and record the subject's ARAT (Action Research Arm Test) score under BCI-assisted conditions, then compare it with the subject's baseline unassisted ARAT grasp score. The response rate will be calculated as the percentage of responders relative to the total number of participants.
3 months post-operation
Adverse Events
Time Frame: Immediately post-implantation, and at 3-, and 6-months post-operation.
Immediately post-implantation, and at 3-, and 6-months post-operation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ISNCSCI Score of the Participant
Time Frame: Baseline, and at 3-, and 6-months post-operation.
The investigator completes the ISNCSCI (International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury) form.
Baseline, and at 3-, and 6-months post-operation.
ARAT Score for BCI-Assisted Grasping
Time Frame: 2-, and 6-months post-operation
The investigator completes the ARAT (Action Research Arm Test) scoring form.
2-, and 6-months post-operation
ARAT Score
Time Frame: Baseline, and at 3-, and 6-months post-operation (assessed with the device powered off).
Investigators will complete the ARAT (Action Research Arm Test) Assessment Form.
Baseline, and at 3-, and 6-months post-operation (assessed with the device powered off).
Investigator's Overall Device Performance Evaluation
Time Frame: Immediately post-implantation, and at 2-, and 3-, and 6-months post-operation.
Investigators will complete the Investigator's Overall Device Performance Evaluation Form.
Immediately post-implantation, and at 2-, and 3-, and 6-months post-operation.
Subject's Overall Device Performance Evaluation
Time Frame: 2-, 3-, and 6-months post-operation.
Subjects will complete the Subject Device Performance Evaluation Questionnaire.
2-, 3-, and 6-months post-operation.
Device Impedance
Time Frame: 1, 2-, 3-, and 6-months post-operation.
Record the impedance of each channel; impedance is considered normal if it does not exceed 20 kΩ.
1, 2-, 3-, and 6-months post-operation.
Average Monthly Device Usage Time
Time Frame: 2-, 3-, and 6-months post-operation.
Calculate the total device usage time per month for each participant.
2-, 3-, and 6-months post-operation.
Participant Quality of Life Score
Time Frame: Baseline, and at 2-, 3-, and 6-months post-operation.
Assessment Method: Participants complete the "Quality of Life Questionnaire"
Baseline, and at 2-, 3-, and 6-months post-operation.
Subject Satisfaction Rating
Time Frame: 2-, 3-, and 6-months post-operation.
Participants evaluate the device's connectivity, operational performance, structural design, and functional design at each follow-up visit.
2-, 3-, and 6-months post-operation.
Investigator Satisfaction with Device Operation
Time Frame: 1-, 2-, 3-, and 6-months post-operation.
At the 1, 2, 3 and 6-month follow-up visits, investigators evaluate the device's connectivity and stability, as well as its electromagnetic compatibility.
1-, 2-, 3-, and 6-months post-operation.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 20, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 20, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 7, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

May 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tetraplegia

Clinical Trials on NEO

Subscribe