Device-Assisted Oropharyngeal Rehabilitation in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients Using Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

Effectiveness of Using Force Sensing Resistor to Assist Oropharyngeal Rehabilitation in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Using Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of device-assisted oropharyngeal rehabilitation (OPR) in improving upper airway muscle function and reducing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity in adult patients diagnosed with OSA who are receiving continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Does combining OPR with CPAP increase upper airway space volume compared to using CPAP alone?
  2. Does OPR improve tongue muscle strength, and is this improvement associated with reduced CPAP pressure requirements?
  3. Do patients receiving OPR (alone or combined with CPAP) show greater improvements in OSA severity and clinical symptoms compared to those receiving CPAP alone or no intervention? Researchers will compare four groups-Control, OPR-only, CPAP-only, and CPAP + OPR-to see if device-assisted OPR enhances treatment outcomes beyond CPAP alone.

Participants will:

  1. Be randomly assigned to one of four groups (Control, OPR-only, CPAP-only, CPAP+OPR).
  2. Perform home-based OPR exercises (30-45 minutes/session, 1-2 sessions/day, 3-5 days/week for 3 months) in the OPR and CPAP+OPR groups.
  3. Have their exercise monitored using a strength sensor, with intensity adjusted every 2-4 weeks during hospital visits.
  4. Undergo assessments before and after the intervention, including:

(1) Polysomnography for OSA severity, (2) CT and ultrasound for upper airway and tongue muscle structure, (3) Tongue muscle strength/endurance tests, (4) Sleep quality questionnaires, (5) CPAP usage and pressure reports.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common respiratory disorder associated with various complications, including cardiovascular, metabolic, and cognitive issues. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy can effectively reduce sleep apnea events and decrease the incidence of related complications. However, studies have shown that approximately half of OSA patients attempting CPAP therapy either cannot tolerate CPAP at all or only partially comply with it. Oropharyngeal rehabilitation (OPR), which involves isometric and isotonic exercises, can enhance the muscle tone of the tongue, pharynx, and soft palate. OPR may serve as one of the treatment options for OSA. Nevertheless, there is limited literature exploring the combined treatment approach of CPAP and OPR.

Methods:This study will recruit 30 200 adult OSA patients, who will be divided into two four groups: Control, OPR, CPAP alone and CPAP+OPR. The OPR training in OPR and CPAP+OPR groups will consist of home-based exercises performed for 30-45 minutes per session, once 1-2 session a day, five 3-5 days a week, over a period of three months. The training will be monitored using a strength sensor, and the intensity of the exercises will be adjusted every two weeks month during hospital visits. Both CPAP and CPAP+OPR groups will continue to wear CPAP every night, while the control group will receive monthly sleep hygiene education. The severity of OSA, upper airway space, tongue muscle length/thickness, tongue muscle strength/endurance, sleep quality, and CPAP usage report will be assessed using polysomnography, computed tomography scans, sonography, tongue muscle function tests, sleep quality questionnaires, and CPAP mask pressure at baseline and after three months of treatment.

Expected outcomes:

  1. Compared to the group using only CPAP, the CPAP + OPR group will have an increased upper airway space volume after a 3-month follow-up. The upper airway space volume is negatively correlated with CPAP pressure and positively correlated with tongue muscle strength.
  2. After 3 months of OPR treatment, the CPAP + OPR group will show an increase in tongue muscle strength, which is negatively correlated with CPAP pressure.
  3. After 3 months of OPR treatment, both the OPR group and the CPAP+OPR group showed greater improvements in upper airway muscle function and greater reductions in obstructive sleep apnea severity and clinical symptoms compared to the control group and the CPAP group respectively.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Tainan, Taiwan, 704
        • National Cheng Kung University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 20 to 68 years
  • Newly diagnosed with mild to severe pure obstructive sleep apnea based on polysomnography

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe allergic rhinitis
  • Sinusitis with nasal polyps
  • Adenoid hypertrophy
  • Bilateral tonsillar hypertrophy (Friedman grade ≥ III)
  • Lingual tonsil hypertrophy (Friedman grade ≥ III)
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) > 40
  • Alcohol or drug abuse within the past year
  • Pregnancy
  • Severe obstructive or restrictive pulmonary diseases
  • High-risk cardiovascular diseases during exercise (e.g., angina, myocardial infarction, heart failure, valvular heart disease)
  • History of central or peripheral neurological disorders that interfere with exercise prescription
  • Musculoskeletal or psychological disorders that interfere with exercise prescription
  • Other non-respiratory sleep disorders
  • Sleep disorders with concomitant central sleep apnea

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Sleep hygiene education
Receive monthly sleep hygiene education
Sleep hygiene education
Experimental: Oropharyngeal rehabilitation
Receive oropharyngeal rehabilitation training over three months
Device-monitoring oropharyngeal exercise, 1-5 days a week for three months
Experimental: Continuous positive airway pressure
Receive continuous positive airway pressure
Continuous positive airway pressure, 1-5 days a week for three months
Experimental: Continuous positive airway pressure and oropharyngeal rehabilitation
Receive continuous positive airway pressure and oropharyngeal rehabilitation training for three months
Continuous positive airway pressure and device-monitoring oropharyngeal exercise, 1-5 days a week for three months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Apnea-Hypopnea Index
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks post intervention
The apnea-hypopnea index will be obtained from the overnight Polysomnography (PSG) study. PSG will be performed in the sleep center of National Cheng Kung University Hospital. Less than 5 events/hour indicates normal; AHI between 5-14 events/hour indicates mild Obstructive Sleep Apnea(OSA); AHI between 15-30 events/hour indicates moderate OSA; and AHI more than 30 events/hour indicates severe OSA.
Baseline and 12 weeks post intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tongue Muscle Strength
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks post intervention
The maximal muscle strength of genioglossus muscles using The Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) system, model 2.2 (Northwest, Co., LLC, Carnation, WA, USA) (kPa)
Baseline and 12 weeks post intervention
Tongue Muscle Endurance
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks post intervention
The endurance of the genioglossus muscles using The Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) system, model 2.2 (Northwest, Co., LLC, Carnation, WA, USA) (in seconds).
Baseline and 12 weeks post intervention
Pharyngeal Airway Volume
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks post intervention
Computer Tomography (CT) will be performed. The pharyngeal airway volume will be calculated from the hard palate to the epiglottis and the data will be presented in cm^3. The minimum score is 0 and a higher score indicates greater in pharyngeal airway volume.
Baseline and 12 weeks post intervention
Cross Section Area on the Tip of Epiglottis
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks post intervention
Computer Tomography (CT) will be performed. Cross section area on the tip of the epiglottis was measured and the data will be presented in cm^2. The minimum score is 0 and a higher score indicates greater in the cross-sectional area of the region.
Baseline and 12 weeks post intervention
Anterior to Posterior Distance on the Tip of the Epiglottis
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks post intervention
The distance between the anterior and posterior pharyngeal wall on the tip of the epiglottis will be measured and presented in cm. The minimal value will be 0 and the greater value indicates a greater distance between the anterior to posterior in this area.
Baseline and 12 weeks post intervention
Lateral Distance on the Tip of Epiglottis
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks post intervention
The distance between the lateral distance on the tip of the epiglottis will be measured and presented in cm. The minimal value will be 0 and the greater value indicates a greater distance between the lateral wall.
Baseline and 12 weeks post intervention
Sleep Quality
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks post intervention
Sleep quality will be measured using Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).The total score ranges from 0 to 21 with a higher total score equal to or more than 5 indicating worse sleep quality.
Baseline and 12 weeks post intervention
Daytime Sleepiness Level
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks post intervention
Epworth Sleepiness Score(ESS) will be used to measure the daytime sleepiness of OSA patients. The total score of ESS range from 0-24. A score greater than 10 indicates greater daytime sleepiness.
Baseline and 12 weeks post intervention
Tongue Muscle Thickness
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks post intervention
Sonography will be performed over the participant's neck region to assess the changes in tongue muscle thickness during normal breathing and Müller's maneuver. The data on tongue thickness will be presented in millimeters. A greater value indicates a thicker in tongue.
Baseline and 12 weeks post intervention
Median Pressure in Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
Time Frame: 1-week average pre intervention, 1-week average post intervention and 1-month average during intervention for 3 months
The change in therapeutic CPAP pressure required to maintain airway patency will be assessed using CPAP usage reports. A reduction in required pressure is expected to indicate improved upper airway muscle tone and stability.
1-week average pre intervention, 1-week average post intervention and 1-month average during intervention for 3 months
Median Usage Hours of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
Time Frame: 1-week average pre intervention, 1-week average post intervention and 1-month average during intervention for 3 months
The average number of hours per night that participants use CPAP will be recorded from CPAP usage reports. Greater nightly usage is considered indicative of better compliance and treatment effectiveness.
1-week average pre intervention, 1-week average post intervention and 1-month average during intervention for 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ching-Hsia Hung, PhD, National Cheng Kung University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

May 31, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 31, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Clinical Trials on Control

3
Subscribe