Integrating AI in Postural Rehabilitation for Parkinson's Disease

Efficacy of Integrating Artificial Intelligence Solutions in Rehabilitation in Postural Trunk Disorders in Parkinson's Disease.

Postural abnormalities are highly disabling complications of Parkinson's disease (PD). These include camptocormia, anterocollis, and Pisa Syndrome (PS). PS is characterized by a lateral trunk flexion (LTF) typically exceeding 10 degrees, often accompanied by axial rotation, asymmetric shoulder positioning, and poor awareness of the postural alteration. This condition worsens during upright activities and improves in a supine position. Patients with PD and PS are characterized by more pronounced motor asymmetry, a disorganized trunk muscle activity, back pain, balance issues, and reduced quality of life compared to PD patients without postural disorders.

Camptocormia, another disabling postural anomaly, involves an anterior trunk flexion that also improves when lying down. Both PS and camptocormia are challenging to treat, with limited and short-lasting benefits from current multidisciplinary approaches, including medication, physiotherapy, botulinum toxin injections, and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

Given the limitations of traditional rehabilitation strategies, there is a growing need for innovative and personalized approaches. In this context, advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) offer new possibilities for home-based treatment. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of using a real-time visual feedback system powered by AI as a complementary intervention following inpatient neurorehabilitation for PD patients with trunk postural disorders (PS or camptocormia). A secondary objective is to assess whether an AI-guided, personalized exercise program can help maintain improvements in posture, mobility, and quality of life in the medium term.

By integrating quantitative and qualitative outcomes, this study seeks to fill a gap in the literature and explore the potential of AI-driven home rehabilitation to support long-term functional gains and foster greater independence and well-being in people with PD.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Postural abnormalities represent particularly disabling complications of Parkinson's disease (PD), significantly affecting patients' functional independence and quality of life. Among the most commonly observed postural deformities there are camptocormia, anterocollis, and Pisa Syndrome (PS). Pisa Syndrome is clinically characterized by a lateral trunk flexion (LTF) greater than 10 degrees, typically presenting with a uniform inclination from the sacrum to the C7 vertebra. It is often accompanied by axial rotation, leading to elevation and forward displacement of the contralateral shoulder. Additional clinical features include difficulty rotating the trunk away from the leaning side, worsening of symptoms during upright posture or walking, improvement in the supine position, and poor patient awareness of the postural deviation.

Patients with PD and PS exhibit greater motor symptom asymmetry, disorganized paraspinal muscle activation, back pain, balance and postural control issues, and reduced quality of life compared to PD patients without postural abnormalities. The current standard of care for these postural disorders typically includes a multidisciplinary approach involving pharmacological treatment, physical therapy, botulinum toxin injections, and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). However, these interventions frequently yield only modest and short-lived improvements, highlighting the need for more sustainable and accessible treatment strategies.

Camptocormia is another severe postural abnormality seen in PD, defined as an involuntary forward flexion of the trunk that is mostly apparent during standing and walking, and tends to reduce when the patient is supine. Like PS, camptocormia is frequently associated with chronic back pain and is often resistant to dopaminergic medication, with many patients reporting no significant improvement in either "on" or "off" states.

The long-term management of these postural disorders remains a significant clinical challenge. Innovative, individualized rehabilitation strategies that can be seamlessly integrated into patients' daily routines are urgently needed. In recent years, technological advancements-particularly in the field of artificial intelligence (AI)-have opened up new avenues for delivering personalized home-based interventions.

This study investigates the feasibility and potential benefits of using a real-time, AI-based visual feedback system as a complementary treatment following hospital-based neurorehabilitation for PD patients with trunk postural disorders, specifically PS and camptocormia. The intervention uses the Kemtai platform, which analyzes movement through video-based AI to deliver customized exercise routines and real-time corrective feedback. This allows patients to engage in highly interactive and adaptive rehabilitation sessions from home, potentially improving adherence and functional outcomes.

The primary objective of the study is to assess the feasibility, safety, and usability of this AI-based system as a continuation of care after inpatient rehabilitation. The secondary objective is to evaluate whether this personalized exercise program can prolong, over the medium term, the gains in posture, mobility, and quality of life achieved during the structured hospital-based rehabilitation period.

By collecting both qualitative feedback (e.g., user satisfaction, perceived usefulness) and quantitative metrics (e.g., trunk inclination angles, mobility scores by means of cinemtaic analysis of movement), this study aims to contribute new evidence on the role of intelligent digital tools in managing postural abnormalities in PD. The overarching hypothesis is that a home-based, AI-monitored exercise program could offer a sustainable, effective, accessible, and patient-centered approach to maintaining functional gains and supporting greater autonomy in everyday life.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Pavia
      • Pavullo Nel Frignano, Pavia, Italy, 27100

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age above 18 years
  • Diagnosis of Parkinson's disease according to MDS criteria
  • Hoehn and Yahr stage ≤ III
  • Clinical diagnosis of camptocormia (presence of an anterior axial trunk flexion of at least 30°), or of Pisa Syndrome (presence of a lateral trunk flexion of at least 10°) at the time of enrollment (T0)
  • Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score > 23

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Atypical parkinsonian syndromes
  • History of spinal surgery
  • Previous vertebral trauma
  • Current or past spinal tumors or infections
  • Idiopathic scoliosis
  • Ankylosing spondylitis
  • Spinal canal stenosis
  • Other neurological conditions
  • Severe dyskinesias

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PD-Subjects
Subjects with Parkinson's Disease and postural disorders (Pisa syndrome or camptocormia).
4-8 weeks of inhospital Neurorehabilitation
AI-based home rehabilitation for postural disorders by means of the Kemtai platform.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
System Usability Scale (SUS)
Time Frame: Single evaluation after 6-8 weeks from intervention (T1)
System Usability Scale (SUS) (continuous variable, score ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better perceived usability of the system)
Single evaluation after 6-8 weeks from intervention (T1)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Static trunk cinematic analysis of movement
Time Frame: Evaluation at baseline, 6-8 weeks from baseline (T1) and 4 weeks from T1 (T2)
By means of a cinematic analysis of movement, we will record trunk posture in static upright standing position (anterior trunk flexion and lateral trunk flexion).
Evaluation at baseline, 6-8 weeks from baseline (T1) and 4 weeks from T1 (T2)
Dynamic trunk cinematic analysis of movement
Time Frame: Evaluation at baseline, 6-8 weeks from baseline (T1) and 4 weeks from T1 (T2)
By means of a cinematic analysis of movement, we will record the range of motion of trunk during four dynamic tasks (anterior flexion, trunk extension, right and left trunk lateral flexion).
Evaluation at baseline, 6-8 weeks from baseline (T1) and 4 weeks from T1 (T2)
Time Up and Go test
Time Frame: Evaluation at baseline, 6-8 weeks from baseline (T1) and 4 weeks from T1 (T2)
Time Up and Go test (continuous variable with units of measurement: second)
Evaluation at baseline, 6-8 weeks from baseline (T1) and 4 weeks from T1 (T2)
Inertial Gait Analysis
Time Frame: Evaluation at baseline, 6-8 weeks from baseline (T1) and 4 weeks from T1 (T2)
Gait analysis performed Inertial Measeurement Units to assess trunk acceleration-derived gait indexes ( continuous variables without measure unit)
Evaluation at baseline, 6-8 weeks from baseline (T1) and 4 weeks from T1 (T2)
30 second chair stand test
Time Frame: Evaluation at baseline, 6-8 weeks from baseline (T1) and 4 weeks from T1 (T2)
Sit to Stand Test (continuous variable with units of measurement: second)
Evaluation at baseline, 6-8 weeks from baseline (T1) and 4 weeks from T1 (T2)
2 minutes walking test
Time Frame: Evaluation at baseline, 6-8 weeks from baseline (T1) and 4 weeks from T1 (T2)
2 minutes walking test (continuous variable with units of measurement: meters)
Evaluation at baseline, 6-8 weeks from baseline (T1) and 4 weeks from T1 (T2)
Functional Independence Measure
Time Frame: Evaluation at baseline, 6-8 weeks from baseline (T1) and 4 weeks from T1 (T2)
Functional Independence Measure (FIM) total score (continuous variable, score ranging from 18 to 126, with higher scores indicating greater functional independence)
Evaluation at baseline, 6-8 weeks from baseline (T1) and 4 weeks from T1 (T2)
Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: Evaluation at baseline, 6-8 weeks from baseline (T1) and 4 weeks from T1 (T2)
Visual Analogue Scale for pain (continuous variable, score ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity)
Evaluation at baseline, 6-8 weeks from baseline (T1) and 4 weeks from T1 (T2)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Luca Martinis, IRCCS Mondino Foundation

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

June 8, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 8, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The final anonymized database will be uploaded in the Zenodo platform.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe