- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07053488
- Original Trial
CRISPR-Edited HLA Donor Liver Transplant to Reduce Rejection
A Phase 1/2, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study to Evaluate the Safety, Immunogenicity Reduction, Transplant Function, and Feasibility of Ex Vivo CRISPR-Cas9 Gene-Edited Donor Liver Transplantation Targeting HLA Class I (HLA-A, HLA-B) and Class II (Via CIITA) Genes.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Organ transplant rejection is primarily driven by immune recognition of donor HLA (human leukocyte antigen) molecules as foreign. Mismatches in HLA-A and HLA-B (class I) in particular are strongly immunogenic and can provoke T-cell mediated graft rejection. HLA class II molecules (HLA-DR, DQ, DP), expressed on donor antigen-presenting cells, can also activate CD4⁺ T cells and contribute to rejection. Current therapy relies on immunosuppressive drugs, which carry significant risks. Preclinical research has shown that genetically "erasing" HLA molecules from donor cells can blunt immune responses: for example, cells with HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DR knocked out via CRISPR elicited little to no T cell proliferation in vitro, indicating greatly reduced immunogenicity. Similarly, in xenotransplant models, triple knockout of genes (including class I and the class II regulator CIITA) in donor animals significantly weakened human T-cell activation and prolonged graft survival. These findings provide a strong rationale that an HLA-edited donor organ could evade the human immune system to a large extent, potentially reducing or delaying rejection.
Gene-Editing of Donor Liver Ex Vivo: In this trial, deceased-donor livers will undergo ex vivo CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing prior to transplantation. The editing targets are HLA-A and HLA-B (to eliminate the major class I alloantigens) and CIITA (class II transactivator, whose knockout abolishes HLA-DR/DQ/DP expression on donor cells). By knocking out HLA-A and -B, while leaving HLA-C expression intact, the goal is to remove the most immunogenic class I molecules yet maintain some HLA presence to mitigate natural killer cell "missing-self" responses. Disabling CIITA will prevent expression of HLA class II proteins, thus reducing CD4⁺ T cell activation against the graft. The CRISPR editing is performed during machine perfusion of the donor liver (a period in which the organ is kept alive outside the body). A CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein (Cas9 enzyme complexed with guide RNAs for HLA-A, HLA-B, and CIITA) is delivered into the liver tissue through the perfusion circuit. Editing takes place ex vivo, avoiding direct in vivo gene therapy to the recipient. Before transplantation, the graft is assessed for successful gene knockout (for example, by biopsy immunostaining or flow cytometry to confirm absence of HLA-A/B/DR on the cell surface). Only livers with confirmed high-efficiency editing (e.g. >90% target gene disruption) are used for transplant to ensure maximal immune-evasion benefit.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Andrew R Linehan
- Phone Number: +1 (302) 615-8388
- Email: clinical-trials@aotcri.org
Study Locations
-
-
Changping
-
Beijing, Changping, China, 102206
- Recruiting
- Peking University Health Science Center (PKUHSC)
-
Contact:
- Huan Yang, Phd
- Phone Number: +8613202512868
- Email: PAD@aotcri.org
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults aged 16-85 (inclusive) with end-stage liver disease or acute liver failure who are eligible for liver transplantation.
- Require a liver transplant and have been allocated a donor liver graft (from a deceased donor) that will be used in the study after gene editing.
- No immediately available fully HLA-matched donor (since the study targets patients who would otherwise receive an HLA-mismatched organ; standard allocation generally does not consider HLA matching for liver, so most patients will qualify).
- Medically suitable for transplant surgery and able to tolerate standard immunosuppressive therapy (no contraindications to transplant such as uncontrolled infection or other active serious disease that would preclude surgery).
- Informed Consent: Able to understand the investigational nature of the trial and provide written informed consent. Patients (and their legal representatives if applicable) must consent to the use of a genetically modified organ and to long-term follow-up including multiple biopsies and immune monitoring.
- Willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of follow-up (including frequent monitoring visits).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Active uncontrolled infection (e.g., sepsis, active tuberculosis) that would severely increase transplant risk or confound interpretation of immune-related outcomes.
- Uncontrolled HIV or chronic viral infections that are not well-managed. (Note: Patients with hepatitis B or C may be included if adequately treated or under control, as these are common in liver failure, but such patients should not have active, replicating virus at transplant if possible.)
- Multi-organ transplant requirement: Patients needing more than a liver alone (e.g., liver-kidney dual transplant) are excluded, as the trial is only evaluating single organ (liver) outcomes.
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding: Female participants of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test prior to transplant and must agree to use effective contraception. The effects of a gene-edited organ transplant on a fetus/infant are unknown, and immunosuppressive drugs can also harm a pregnancy.
- Severe concurrent illness not related to liver disease that would limit survival to <1 year or make the patient an unsuitable candidate (e.g., advanced heart failure, uncontrolled diabetes with complications, etc.).
- Allergy or hypersensitivity to study-related products: If any components used in the ex vivo gene editing (such as a specific vehicle or enzyme) have known severe allergies in the recipient, they will be excluded. (For instance, although unlikely, if a patient had a documented severe immune reaction to Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 or similar proteins, they would not be enrolled.)
- Inability to follow the protocol or comply with follow-up: this includes psychiatric, social or logistical factors that would prevent adhering to the intense monitoring schedule (for example, lack of reliable transportation or support).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: CRISPR-Edited Donor Liver Transplant
Participants undergo orthotopic liver transplantation using a donor liver that has been ex vivo gene-edited by CRISPR-Cas9 to knock out HLA class I (A, B) and class II (via CIITA) genes.
There is no comparator arm; outcomes will be compared to historical norms of unedited transplants for context.
|
Donor liver tissue is perfused outside the body with a CRISPR-Cas9 RNP complex targeting HLA-A, HLA-B, and CIITA, to create a hypoimmunogenic graft.
After confirming successful gene knockout, the liver is transplanted into the patient following standard surgical techniques.
Post-operative care includes routine immunosuppressive therapy with planned adjustments based on the patient's tolerance and evidence of graft immunogenicity.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 90
|
Number of participants experiencing ≥1 CTCAE v5.0 Grade 3-5 TEAE judged related to the gene-edited liver transplant procedure
|
Day 1 to Day 90
|
|
Feasibility of Ex Vivo HLA Gene Editing
Time Frame: Day1 to Day 90
|
Proportion of donor livers that achieve the desired editing criteria (e.g., >90% knockout efficiency of HLA-A/B and abolition of class II expression) and are successfully transplanted into recipients.
Feasibility is further indicated by the absence of technical issues during organ editing and transplantation.
|
Day1 to Day 90
|
|
Graft Failure Rate at Day 90
Time Frame: Day1 to Day 90
|
Proportion of participants requiring re-transplant, graft explant, or returning to listing due to primary non-function.Unit of Measure :Participants with graft failure (n, %)
|
Day1 to Day 90
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of Acute Rejection at 6 and 12 Months
Time Frame: Day 1 - Month 12
|
The proportion of patients experiencing biopsy-confirmed acute cellular rejection episodes within 6 months and within 12 months post-transplant.
The severity of rejection (graded by standard criteria) and response to treatment will also be recorded.
A lower-than-expected rejection rate or milder rejection would indicate a successful immunogenicity reduction.
|
Day 1 - Month 12
|
|
Immunologic Markers of Alloreactivity
Time Frame: Day 1 - Month 12
|
Levels of anti-donor HLA antibodies in recipient blood (donor-specific antibodies, DSA) and T-cell alloimmune reactivity (e.g., in vitro mixed lymphocyte reaction or ELISPOT assays against donor cells) at 3, 6, and 12 months.
We will compare these immunologic markers to baseline and to typical post-transplant profiles.
We hypothesize that patients with edited grafts will show attenuated T cell responses to donor antigens.
|
Day 1 - Month 12
|
|
Graft Survival and Function at 1 Year
Time Frame: Day 1 - Month 12
|
Number of patients with the original transplanted liver surviving at 12 months with no graft loss.
|
Day 1 - Month 12
|
|
Patient Survival at 1 Year
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Overall survival of participants at 1 year post-transplant.
|
12 months
|
|
Immunosuppression Reduction Feasibility
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Among patients with stable graft function, ability to taper down immunosuppressive therapy by 6-12 months post-transplant without precipitating rejection.
This will be measured by the proportion of patients successfully maintaining graft health on reduced immunosuppressant dosage or simpler regimen.
|
12 months
|
|
Off-target Effects Assessment
Time Frame: 24 months
|
trial will evaluate any evidence of off-target gene editing effects manifesting in the graft (for example, unexpected histological changes, or aberrant liver function that could hint at unintended gene disruptions).
Genomic analyses of edited tissue will be done to characterize off-target mutation frequency.
|
24 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- AOTCRI-102
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Liver Diseases
-
Foundation for the National Institutes of HealthRecruitingLiver Fat | Cirrhosis, Liver | Liver Fibrosis | NASH | Liver Inflammation | Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease | Liver Steatoses | Metabolic Associated Steatotic Liver DiseaseUnited States
-
King's College Hospital NHS TrustSamsung MedisonRecruitingHepatitis | Liver Fat | NAFLD | Fibrosis, Liver | Liver Disease Chronic | Liver Steatoses | NASH With FibrosisUnited Kingdom
-
Medical University of WarsawRecruitingEnd Stage Liver Disease | Liver Transplantation | Liver Transplant | Liver Transplant SurgeryPoland
-
Shengjing HospitalEnrolling by invitationLiver Steatosis | Liver Fibrosis | Liver Fibrosis Progression in Chronic Liver Disease | Steatotic Liver Disease | Steatotic Liver Disease of Mixed Origin (MetALD)China
-
Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, IndiaCompletedAcute Liver FailureIndia
-
Tehran University of Medical SciencesNot yet recruitingLiver Transplant; Complications | Liver Transplant Disorder | End-stage Liver DiseaseIran, Islamic Republic of
-
Medical College of WisconsinRecruiting
-
HaEmek Medical Center, IsraelTerminatedPatients With Fatty Liver DiseaseIsrael
-
Beijing Chao Yang HospitalUnknownLiver Transplantation | End Stage Liver DIseaseChina
-
Johannes Gutenberg University MainzUniversity of JenaCompletedNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease | Fatty Liver, NonalcoholicGermany
Clinical Trials on Ex Vivo CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Editing of Donor Liver
-
AMERICAN ORGAN TRANSPLANT AND CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE...RecruitingKidney Transplant Rejection | End-Stage Renal Disease | Kidney Failure | Kidney Tumor | End Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis | Kidney Ischemia | End Stage Renal Disease With Renal TransplantChina
-
Shanghai BDgene Co., Ltd.Beijing Tongren HospitalRecruitingPrimary Open Angle GlaucomaChina
-
Xijing HospitalActive, not recruitingHepatic FailureChina
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisImagine Institute; Axonal-Biostatem; CERBA laboratory; SATT; SNC Graft Versus Host...RecruitingAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia | Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Remission | Lymphoma in Remission | Non-progressive Myeloproliferative Syndrome | Myelodysplasia With Stable Blasts is Cell Number and < 10% of Blastocysts | Acute Leukemia Biphenotypic in RemissionFrance, Germany, Belgium
-
German Cancer Research CenterUniversity Hospital Heidelberg; University Hospital DresdenNot yet recruitingRelapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)Germany
-
Imperial College LondonWithdrawnAllogeneic Stem Cell Transplant | Haematological Malignancies | CD56+CD3- NK CellsUnited Kingdom