Pharmacist-led Digital Interventions to Improve Tuberculosis Treatment Adherence (CARE-TB)

July 7, 2025 updated by: University of Malaya

Comprehensive Digital Adherence and Remote Engagement to Optimise Treatment Adherence for Tuberculosis Patients (CARE-TB Study) in Selangor, Malaysia: An Effectiveness-Implementation Science Study

The gold standard for tuberculosis (TB) treatment support requires directly observed therapy (DOT), which means a trained health worker observes the patient swallow each dose of medication every day for 2 months. Despite the practice of DOT in Malaysia, 1 in 20 patients are loss-to-follow-up and non-adherent to treatment. Sub-optimal adherence due to poor treatment acceptability and social desirability promotes TB treatment failure, disease relapse, on-going transmission, drug resistance, and death. Telemedicine offers a flexible and less invasive option to support TB treatment adherence. Despite 97% internet and smartphone penetration rates, the practical implementation of digital adherence strategies to support and monitor TB treatment remains untested in Malaysia. The investigators propose to design, implement, and measure the effectiveness of a comprehensive, pharmacist-led digital solution for TB treatment support called CARE-TB which combines a package of asynchronous video-observed therapy, digital reminders, telecounselling and e-learning. In this multi-method effectiveness-implementation (Type 2) study using the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation and Sustainment (EPIS) framework, the investigators aim 1) To identify patient and provider-level facilitators and barriers to CARE-TB adoption via qualitative evaluation and to design a stakeholder-informed implementation strategy, (2) To assess effectiveness of CARE-TB strategy by evaluating (i) implementation outcomes, (ii) patient health outcomes, and (iii) service outcomes, and (3) To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CARE-TB compared to standard of care from a societal perspective. This study will leverage digital platforms to expand the reach of TB adherence support, enhance adherence to TB treatment and improve treatment completion rates, while utilising existing personnel and resources in among the busiest TB treatment centres in the country.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Selangor
      • Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia, 47000

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Microbiologically confirmed pulmonary TB (smear- or culture-positive PTB)
  2. 18 years old or older
  3. Able to give consent and physically able to participate in the study
  4. Own a video-recording device with internet connectivity
  5. Within the first 3 weeks of intensive phase TB treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Complicated TB disease including TB meningitis, TB bone/joint, and disseminated TB with planned treatment duration of 9 to 12 months.
  2. Confirmed or suspected drug-resistant (DR)-TB
  3. Documented cognitive, motor, or visual disability that will hinder video device use and lack assistance of a caretaker
  4. Receiving injectable anti-TB drugs
  5. Incarceration or other involuntary detention

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard care arm
Directly observed therapy (healthcare or caretaker-based)
Directly observed therapy at any government healthcare facility (by nurses) or at home (by caretaker)
Other Names:
  • Directly observed therapy
  • In-person dose monitoring
Experimental: CARE-TB arm
CARE-TB package includes pharmacist-led asynchronous video observed therapy, digital medication reminders, telecounselling and e-learning for patients.
CARE-TB package includes pharmacist-led asynchronous video observed therapy, digital medication reminders, telecounselling and e-learning for patients.
Other Names:
  • education
  • motivational interviewing
  • counselling
  • video observed therapy
  • reminder
  • digital intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Medication adherence (Binary outcome)
Time Frame: 8 weeks following enrollment
Completed ≥ 80% scheduled observations during the 8 weeks following enrolment.
8 weeks following enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence rate (Continuous outcome)
Time Frame: 8 weeks following enrolment
Proportion of doses observed over 8 weeks (Dose observed divided by total observable doses prescribed)
8 weeks following enrolment
Proportion of TB treatment completion, death, loss to follow up, and hospitalization
Time Frame: From enrolment till 6 months or treatment completion/ termination
Proportion of patients completing TB treatment, died, are lost to follow-up or hospitalized during TB treatment
From enrolment till 6 months or treatment completion/ termination
TB cure rate
Time Frame: At 6 months of treatment
Proportion of microbiological TB clearance (e.g. AFB smear/ MTB PCR/ MTB culture)
At 6 months of treatment
Adverse event reporting
Time Frame: From enrolment till 6 months of treatment
Number of adverse events or adverse drug reactions reported during TB treatment
From enrolment till 6 months of treatment
EQ-5D-5L Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
Time Frame: At baseline, 2 months and 6 months of treatment

HRQoL will be assessed using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire.

Unit of Measure: EQ-5D index score (range: -0.281 to 1.000 based on country-specific value set)

Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.

At baseline, 2 months and 6 months of treatment
SF-12 Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
Time Frame: At baseline and 2 months of treatment

The 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) will be used to assess participants' health-related quality of life. Two summary scores will be generated: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS).

The scoring scale is from 0 to 100, the higher the score the better the health related quality of life.

At baseline and 2 months of treatment
Implementation Outcomes: Acceptability, Feasibility, Appropriateness (Quantitative measure)
Time Frame: At 2 months and 6 months of treatment

Implementation outcomes will be assessed using the combined Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM), and Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) questionnaire.

Unit of Measure: Total and individual mean scores on 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely disagree, 5 = completely agree)

Scoring: Each subscale consists of 4 items; subscale scores range from 4 to 20

Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater perceived acceptability, feasibility, or appropriateness of the intervention

At 2 months and 6 months of treatment
Perceived acceptability, feasibility, and fit of the intervention (Qualitative measure)
Time Frame: After 6 months of implementation phase

Semi-structured qualitative interviews and focus group discussions will explore participants' perceptions of the intervention's acceptability, feasibility, and fit.

Unit of Measure: Thematic findings from qualitative analysis

Interpretation: Interview data will be thematically coded and analyzed to identify key barriers, facilitators, and contextual factors.

After 6 months of implementation phase
Adoption rate
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Rate of uptake (number of participants who agree to use the CARE TB strategy divided by total number offered)
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Patient fidelity to intervention
Time Frame: 8 weeks following enrolment
Rate of drop-out (count of individuals who fulfill any of the following: withdraw from the study, switch arms, appointment no-show)
8 weeks following enrolment
Healthcare providers (HCP) fidelity to intervention
Time Frame: 8 weeks following enrolment
Rate of reengagement attempt (count of reminders sent to reestablish VOT over total number of missed VOT appointments)
8 weeks following enrolment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Reena Rajasuriar, University of Malaya

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 7, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported following deidentification.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 3 months following publication and no end date.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Investigators whose proposed used of data has been approved by independent review. Proposals should be submitted to kohhuimoon@moh.gov.my. To gain access, a data sharing agreement must be signed.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tuberculosis (TB)

Clinical Trials on Standard Care

Subscribe