Hydroxyapetite Nanoparticles and Tricalcium Phosphate Nanoparticles Loaded on Platelet Rich Fibrin Membranes for Treatment of Gingival Recession

July 19, 2025 updated by: Enas Elgendy

Comparative Study Between Hydroxyapetite Nanoparticles and Tricalcium Phosphate Nanoparticles Loaded on Platelet Rich Fibrin Membranes for Treatment of Gingival Recession

The "Glossary of the American of Periodontology" defines gingival recession (GR) as the apical movement of the gingival margin beyond the cement-enamel junction. Therefore, root surface exposure brought on by gingival recession results in cosmetic impairment, fear of tooth loss, increased susceptibility to root caries, and dentin hypersensitivity. The use of free gingival grafts, sliding pedicle grafts, subepithelial connective tissue grafts, envelope or tunnelling techniques, the use of acellular dermal, connective tissue allografts, guided tissue regeneration, and coronally advanced flap (CAF) are the surgical methods that have been developed to treat gingival recession. The medical area has been invaded by nanotechnology, and the findings are highly promising. Nanomaterials perform far better than conventional materials thanks to their superior surface, size, and quantum effects. Hydroxyapatites (HAs) are a family of materials used for bone grafting that have a high level of biocompatibility, which is partly due to their inclusion in naturally calcified tissue. The aim of the present study was to compare between nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate carried on PRP membrane in treatment of Miller's class 1 gingival recession in human.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The primary objective of periodontal therapy is the regeneration of periodontal tissues that have been lost owing to periodontal disease since gingival recession results in the loss of both soft and hard tissue. Periodontal regeneration, demonstrated histologically by the development of new cementum, new alveolar bone, functionally orientated periodontal ligament, and gingiva, is the rebuilding of the lost tissues. Platelet rich fibrin (PRF), which contains significant amounts of growth factors, platelets, fibrin membrane, leukocytes, and cytokines, was introduced for periodontal regeneration. The capacity of PRF to boost collagen production and fibroblast proliferation has been demonstrated, and it is widely used to repair and enhance the regeneration of both soft tissues and hard tissues following various periodontal surgical procedures. Xenografts were established in the field of periodontology to address the drawbacks of autogenous bone graft and allograft. Although these materials provide a solution to some of the aforementioned issues, the issue of immunogenicity and the transmission of disease had been frequently brought up; as a result, alloplastic materials were produced. These substances, which are artificial, inorganic, and biocompatible bone graft alternatives, offer a potential substitute for the treatment of periodontal disorders. The benefits of these materials include better accessibility, the removal of the requirement for a donor site, and the absence of any risk of disease transmission. In controlled clinical studies, hydroxyapatite (HA) and tricalcium phosphate (TCP), two alloplastic materials, significantly improved clinical outcomes at grafted locations compared to non-grafted sites. Cone beam computed tomography produces 3D images that are required in periodontics for the diagnosis of intra bony defects, furcation involvements, and destructions of the buccal and lingual bones. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate, both applied on a PRP membrane, in treating Miller's class 1 gingival recession in humans.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Al Gharbīyah
      • Tanta, Al Gharbīyah, Egypt
        • Enas Elgendy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with good systemic health and no contraindication for periodontal surgery.
  • Patients who are able to maintain good oral hygiene.
  • Gingival thickness for the site selected should be ≥1mm.
  • The height of keratinized gingiva (HKG) for the site selected should be ≥1 mm (HKG is the distance between the most apical point of the gingival margin and the mucogingival junction).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active infectious diseases (hepatitis, tuberculosis, HIV, etc….).
  • Medically compromised patients.
  • Patients taking medications known to cause gingival enlargement.
  • Pregnant patients and smokers.
  • Previous mucogingival surgery at the defect.
  • Restorations or caries in the area to be treated and non vital tooth.
  • Teeth which are tilted or rotated.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite loaded in PRF+ coronally advanced flap
Ten sites with gingival recession treated with Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite loaded in PRF+ coronally advanced flap.

Two horizontal incisions were made at right angles to the adjacent interdental papillae at the CEJ level without interfering with the gingival margin of the neighbouring teeth. To mobilize the flap, two oblique vertical releasing incisions were extended beyond the mucogingival junction. A full thick¬ness trapezoidal flap was then elevated up to the mucogingival junction, and follow¬ing penetration of the periosteum, a par¬tial thickness flap was dissected further apically. The papillae mesial and distal to the recession defects were deepithelialized.

Following conditioning, the root surface was rinsed with sterile saline for 1 minute. Following conditioning, the root surface the PRF membrane loaded by nanocrystale hydroxyapatite was positioned to cover the recession up to CEJ. The flap was then coronally advanced to cover the membrane, and flap was closed using simple interrupted sutures. A periodontal dressing was placed over the recipient site for 10 days to protect the wounds.

Experimental: Nanocrystalline tricalcium phosphate (NcTCP) loaded in PRF+ coronally advanced flap
Ten sites of gingival recession treated with Nanocrystalline tricalcium phosphate (NcTCP) loaded in PRF+ coronally advanced flap

Two horizontal incisions were made at right angles to the adjacent interdental papillae at the CEJ level without interfering with the gingival margin of the neighbouring teeth. To mobilize the flap, two oblique vertical releasing incisions were extended beyond the mucogingival junction. A full thick¬ness trapezoidal flap was then elevated up to the mucogingival junction, and follow¬ing penetration of the periosteum, a par¬tial thickness flap was dissected further apically. The papillae mesial and distal to the recession defects were deepithelialized.

Following conditioning, the root surface was rinsed with sterile saline for 1 minute. Following conditioning, the root surface the PRF membrane loaded by Nanocrystalline tricalcium was positioned to cover the recession up to CEJ. The flap was then coronally advanced to cover the membrane, and flap was closed using simple interrupted sutures. A periodontal dressing was placed over the recipient site for 10 days to protect the wounds.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of root coverage (RC)
Time Frame: after 1, 3, 6 months post operatively
Percentage of root coverage (RC): is calculated after 1, 3, 6 months as [RH preoperative - RH postoperative]/RH preoperative) x 100%.
after 1, 3, 6 months post operatively
Facial bone level
Time Frame: 6 months
Facial bone level was the distance from the apex of the tooth to most coronal point of the facial bone.
6 months
Horizontal facial bone thickness
Time Frame: after 6 months
Horizontal facial bone thickness was the thickness of the facial bone at the middle of the root length.
after 6 months
Recession height (RH)
Time Frame: at 1, 3 and 6 month post surgically
distance between cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the most apical point of the gingival margin (GM).
at 1, 3 and 6 month post surgically
Recession width (RW)
Time Frame: at 1, 3 and 6 month post surgically
from one border of the recession to another, measured at the CEJ.
at 1, 3 and 6 month post surgically
Height of the keratinized tissue (HKT)
Time Frame: 1, 3 and 6 month post surgically
Height of the keratinized tissue (HKT): distance between the most apical point of the GM and the mucogingival junction (MGJ).
1, 3 and 6 month post surgically

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bone density
Time Frame: after 6 months
Bone density: measured at the facial bone at the middle of the root length
after 6 months
Plaque index
Time Frame: at 1, 3 and 6 month post surgically
at 1, 3 and 6 month post surgically
Gingival index (GI)
Time Frame: at 1, 3 and 6 month post surgically
at 1, 3 and 6 month post surgically
Probing pocket depth (PPD)
Time Frame: at 6 months post surgically
at 6 months post surgically
Clinical attachment level (CAL)
Time Frame: at 6 months post surgically
at 6 months post surgically
Wound healing index (WHI)
Time Frame: at 14 days and 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery.
at 14 days and 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 19, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Periodontal Diseases

Clinical Trials on Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite loaded in PRF+ coronally advanced flap

Subscribe