Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Arcevo LSA (ARTIZEN)

May 19, 2026 updated by: Artivion Inc.

A Prospective, Multi-center Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Arcevo LSA in the Open Repair of Aortic Arch Aneurysms and Dissections

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the Arcevo LSA stent graft can safely and effectively treat patients that have an acute or chronic aortic dissection and/or aneurysm that involves the aortic arch and the descending thoracic aorta, with or without the involvement of the ascending aorta.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

132

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35205
        • Recruiting
        • University of Alabama
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Kyle Eudailey, MD
        • Contact:
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033
        • Recruiting
        • University of Southern California
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Fernando Fleischman, MD
        • Contact:
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • Recruiting
        • University of Colorado Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • T. Brett Reece, MD
        • Contact:
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States, 20010
        • Recruiting
        • MedStar Washington Health
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Christian Shults, MD
        • Contact:
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Recruiting
        • Emory University School of Medicine
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Bradley Leshnower, MD
        • Contact:
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Recruiting
        • Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Christopher Malaisrie, MD
        • Contact:
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Recruiting
        • Johns Hopkins Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mehrdad Ghoreishi, MD
        • Contact:
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • Recruiting
        • University of Michigan
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Shinichi Fukuhara, MD
        • Contact:
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10075
        • Recruiting
        • Northwell Health
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Derek Brinster, MD
        • Contact:
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Recruiting
        • Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Hiroo Takayama, MD, PhD
        • Contact:
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Recruiting
        • Cornell Medical College (Presbyterian Weill)
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Christopher Lau, MD
        • Contact:
      • The Bronx, New York, United States, 10467
        • Recruiting
        • Montefiore Medical Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Joseph DeRose, MD
        • Contact:
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Recruiting
        • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Patrick Vargo, MD, FACS
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15212
        • Recruiting
        • Allegheny General Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Michael Halbreiner, MD
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78705
        • Recruiting
        • University of Texas - Austin
        • Principal Investigator:
          • George Arnaoutakis, MD
        • Contact:
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Recruiting
        • University of Texas, McGovern Medical Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Anthony Estrera, MD
        • Contact:
      • Plano, Texas, United States, 75093
        • Recruiting
        • Baylor Scott & White
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Bill Brinkman, MD
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98105
        • Recruiting
        • University of Washington / Harborview Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Chris Burke, MD
    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226
        • Recruiting
        • Medical College of Wisconsin
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jorge Mascaro, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

General Inclusion Criteria

  1. ≥18 years of age or ≤80 years of age (male or female) at time of surgery
  2. Patient has one of the following indications for open surgery based on computed tomography angiography (CTA) completed within 90 days of informed consent:

    • Acute, subacute, or chronic dissection that involves the aortic arch and the descending thoracic aorta, with or without involvement of the ascending aorta
    • Aneurysm that involves the aortic arch and the descending thoracic aorta, with or without involvement of the ascending aorta
  3. Patient, or patient's legally authorized representative (LAR; in the secondary arm only), provides written informed consent prior to any study procedures
  4. Patient's surgery occurs within 90 days of informed consent

    Anatomical Inclusion Criteria

  5. Aortic diameter at the intended Arcevo™ LSA anastomosis site is ≥ 21 mm
  6. For Aneurysm with distal sealing (i.e., single stage procedure), aortic diameter at the intended distal sealing zone is between 20-36 mm
  7. For Dissection with distal sealing, aortic diameter at the intended distal sealing zone is between 22-40 mm
  8. LSA branch does not require additional stenting further into the LSA (beyond the Arcevo™ LSA)
  9. The intended LSA sealing zone has a diameter between 8.5 mm and 14.0 mm with a length of at least 10 mm
  10. Absence of dissection, aneurysm, or stenosis in the intended LSA sealing zone
  11. The intended LSA branch position does not interrupt flow to any branch vessel (e.g., left vertebral artery)
  12. Patient does not have computed tomography (CT) evidence of extreme arch or LSA angulation precluding safe passage of the Arcevo™ LSA and delivery system
  13. LSA take-off angle between 15° and 90°
  14. For patients requiring planned extension, there is a ≥ 2 cm distal seal zone for the TEVAR device without a severely angulated descending aorta
  15. For patients requiring planned extension, patient has suitable iliac artery anatomy for safe passage of the TEVAR delivery system

General Exclusion Criteria

  1. Patient is pregnant, or planning to become pregnant during the course of the study; individuals of child-bearing potential must agree to use acceptable methods of contraception during the study
  2. Patient has another medical condition (aside from the arch disease) that, in the opinion of the investigator, reduces the patient's life expectancy to < 2 years
  3. Patient has an existing aortic stent graft device in the descending aorta that would interact with Arcevo™ LSA
  4. Patient has a medical, social, or psychological problem that, in the opinion of the investigator, could impede the patient's ability to return for follow-up
  5. Patient is unwilling or unable to comply with the follow-up schedule
  6. Patient is institutionalized due to administrative or judicial order
  7. Patient is unwilling to accept blood transfusion or blood product
  8. Patient is currently participating in another interventional clinical study which includes treatment with another investigational product (e.g., device, pharmaceutical or biologic)

    Medical Exclusion Criteria

  9. Patient is unfit for open surgical repair involving circulatory arrest
  10. Patient is in extreme hemodynamic compromise requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or substantial inotropic support prior to surgery
  11. Patient has an active systemic infection
  12. Patient has endocarditis or active infection of the aorta
  13. Patient has a freely ruptured aorta
  14. Patient has a history of a bleeding disorder (e.g., hemophilia)
  15. Patient has current end-stage renal disease (e.g., GFR <30 mL/min)
  16. Patient has a known allergy to Arcevo™ LSA components and TEVAR device components (if required) (nitinol, polyester, platinum-iridium, or polyethylene)
  17. Patient has uncontrollable anaphylaxis to iodinated contrast or other inability to obtain CT angiograms during follow-up
  18. Patient has acute coronary malperfusion
  19. Patient has symptomatic visceral malperfusion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arcevo LSA

The Primary study arm will consist of patients with an aortic aneurysm or chronic aortic dissection (n=117).

The Secondary study arm will include patients with acute or subacute aortic dissections (n=15).

The Arcevo LSA Hybrid Stent Graft System is an implantable aortic stent graft with LSA branch which is preloaded onto a delivery system and implanted during an open surgical procedure, or more specifically a total arch replacement procedure. The device is intended for use with a proximal surgical graft (not supplied). If additional coverage is needed, a protocol specified thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) device may be used.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Composite Rate of Patients Free From ≥1 Major Adverse Event
Time Frame: 1 year post-index procedure of LSA stent graft implant

The major adverse events included in the composite are:

  • All-cause mortality
  • New permanent disabling stroke
  • New permanent paraplegia and/or paraparesis
  • Unanticipated aortic reoperation in the treated segment
  • LSA occlusion
1 year post-index procedure of LSA stent graft implant

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Mortality
Time Frame: Follow-up at 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months of the index procedure
All-cause, Cardiovascular-related, Aorta-related, Procedure-related, Device-related
Follow-up at 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months of the index procedure
Rate of Patients with ≥1 Additional Aortic Procedure
Time Frame: Follow-up at 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months of the index procedure
All unplanned aortic procedures (endovascular, percutaneous, and open), Unanticipated aortic reoperations in the treated segment, Unanticipated device-related reoperations, Arcevo LSA explant
Follow-up at 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months of the index procedure
Rate of Patients with ≥1 Device-Related Event
Time Frame: Follow-up at 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months of the index procedure
Device migration, Distal stent-induced new entry (d-SINE), Failed stent patency in the main body, Failed stent patency in the LSA, Stent-graft integrity issue compromising flow (i.e., stent fracture, narrowing, kink, or twist)
Follow-up at 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months of the index procedure
Rate of Patients with Major Adverse Events
Time Frame: Follow-up at 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months of the index procedure
New permanent paraplegia, New permanent paraparesis, New temporary paraplegia, New disabling stroke, New non-disabling stroke, New transient ischemic attack, Aortic rupture, Bowel ischemia, Hypersensitivity, Myocardial infarction, New onset renal failure requiring temporary dialysis, New onset renal failure requiring permanent dialysis, Pseudoaneurysm, Recurrent laryngeal or phrenic nerve injury, Respiratory failure (need for reintubation or ventilator dependence >48 hours), Severe heart failure requiring mechanical circulatory support, Thromboembolic adverse events
Follow-up at 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months of the index procedure
Rate of Patients with Radiographic Events (determined by Core Lab)
Time Frame: Follow-up at 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months of the index procedure

Anastomotic Leak between Arcevo™ LSA and surgical graft (i.e., Type Ia Endoleak or Distal anastomotic new entry [DANE]), Type Ic Endoleak (i.e. at the end of the LSA stent component), LSA occlusion, New LSA dissection, Maximal total aortic diameter growth >1 cm in the treated segment (Zones 2-4) compared to first post-operative CTA, Maximal total aortic diameter growth >1 cm at 1 cm beyond the distal end of Arcevo™ LSA, compared annually.

Dissection Only:

True lumen (TL) reduction compared to baseline > 5.0 mm at maximal total aortic diameter (Zones 2-4), False lumen (FL) growth compared to baseline > 5.0 mm at maximal total aortic diameter (Zones 2-4), FL thrombosis in the treated segment (LSA, Zones 2-4), FL thrombosis in the untreated segment (Zone 5).

Follow-up at 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months of the index procedure
Rate of Patients Requiring a Thoracic Extension Procedure who Experience Device-Extension Failure
Time Frame: Follow-up at 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months of the index procedure
Any failure of device-extension integrity (e.g., wear or tear in the fabric or wire breakage) resulting in a compromised seal and blood leakage or movement of the device
Follow-up at 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months of the index procedure
Rate of Patient Requiring a Thoracic Extension Procedure with Evidence of Type IIIa Endoleak
Time Frame: Follow-up at 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months of index procedure
Type IIIa Endoleak
Follow-up at 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months of index procedure
Rate of Patients Requiring Thoracic Extension Procedure with Failed Patency
Time Frame: Follow-up at 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months of the index procedure
Failed patency of the device-extension overlap
Follow-up at 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months of the index procedure
Rate of Patients Requiring Thoracic Extension Procedure with ≥1 Primary Major Adverse Events
Time Frame: 30 days post-extension procedure
All-cause mortality, new permanent disabling stroke, new permanent paraplegia and/or paraparesis, unanticipated aortic reoperation in the treated segment, LSA occlusion
30 days post-extension procedure
Rate of Patients Requiring Thoracic Extension Procedure Requiring ≥1 Secondary Procedure Related to Extension
Time Frame: 30 days post-extension procedure
Secondary procedures related to the extension
30 days post-extension procedure

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Patients with Technical Success
Time Frame: At exit from operating room

Successful delivery and accurate placement of the device in the intended implantation site, as well as retrieval of the device delivery system, AND

Patency of the device, including LSA, at conclusion of the procedure, AND

No need for unanticipated or emergency surgery to correct a device malfunction or device-related complication

At exit from operating room
Rate of Patients with Procedural Success
Time Frame: At hospital discharge or at 30 days, whichever is longer at time of event

Technical success with the absence of the following:

Death,

Major adverse ischemic events, including the following:

New disabling stroke, New paraplegia, New paraparesis, New device-related ischemia (i.e., not evident at time of index procedure), Distal procedure-related thromboembolic adverse event.

General procedure-related complications:

New onset renal failure requiring dialysis, Bowel or limb ischemia requiring surgery or intervention, Additional unplanned surgical or interventional procedures related to the device, since completion of the index procedure

At hospital discharge or at 30 days, whichever is longer at time of event
Rate of Patients with Treatment Success
Time Frame: Follow-up at 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months of the index procedure

Technical success with the absence of the following:

Aorta-related mortality.

Major adverse ischemic events, including the following:

New disabling stroke, New permanent paraplegia, New permanent paraparesis, Increase in total aortic diameter > 1.0 cm between scheduled post-operative imaging (performed per schedule of activities) in the treated region of the aorta (Zones 2-4), Aortic rupture, Fistula formation (i.e., aortobronchial or aortoenteric), Device-related occlusion of the aortic arch (Zones 2-4), Loss of device integrity (e.g., stent fracture that could affect fixation or seal, graft fabric hole or tear, collapse), New Type Ic endoleak.

Follow-up at 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months of the index procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 4, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2032

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 17, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aortic Arch Aneurysm

Clinical Trials on Arcevo™ LSA Hybrid Stent Graft System

Subscribe