- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07090239
- Original Trial
French Translation of The Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised (f-FSDS-R)
French Translation of the Self-administered Questionnaire The Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised
Two independent teams (Brest and Nice) each produce a forward translation from English to French. The translations are compared, and discrepancies are discussed with the translation coordinator, the second translator, and the scientific lead to produce a unified preliminary French version (Version 1), including the response options.
Version 1 is then back-translated into English by an English-speaking linguist and a French physician whose native language is English, without access to the original questionnaire, in order to detect potential translation issues. The team then holds a discussion to compare the original English version, the French Version 1, and the back-translations, resulting in the development of Version 2.
Version 2 is tested with a representative sample of patients using a paper questionnaire, which includes two follow-up questions after each item to assess comprehension and identify potential difficulties. The team analyzes the responses, and if comprehension issues are identified, they organize further discussions with the translators and back-translators to revise the items concerned. The revised items are then re-tested with patients, including those who have and have not reported difficulties, to ensure that the final version is clear and understandable for all.
the investigators conduct prospective recruitment after verifying the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Inclusion criteria:
Adult patient Affiliation with a social security scheme
Exclusion criteria:
Patients under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship, etc.) Refusal to participate Patients with difficulties understanding the French language Patients consulting in the adult or gynecological emergency department, or accompanying another person, are informed about the possibility of completing a questionnaire.
The participants informed that their data will be recorded for the purpose of practice evaluation and results analysis in an anonymous and confidential manner, using the information sheet provided for the study. The participants free to refuse participation without any impact on their care.
Patients receive complete and clear information regarding the objectives of the study, their right to refuse participation, and their right to withdraw at any time. All this information appears on the information and non-opposition form provided to each patient. Participation is noted in the patient's medical record.
Administration procedures:
The questionnaire is distributed in the waiting area and is self-administered by the patient. Once consent is given, the patient completes the questionnaire independently.
Follow-up:
The estimated participation time is approximately 10 minutes, corresponding to the time required to complete the questionnaire. Patients may be contacted again if necessary to re-test reformulated items, including those who reported comprehension difficulties and others who did not.
The inclusion period lasts 6 months. The individual participation time is 10 minutes. The total duration of the prospective study (inclusion + follow-up) is 8 months.
The overall study timeline (including data entry and management of non-opposition forms) is 12 months.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Brest, France, 29200
- Chu Brest
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- >18 years
- affiliated to a social security scheme
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients under judicial protection (guardianship, curatorship, ...)
- Refusal to participate
- Patient having difficulties understanding the French language.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
The primary outcome is the item-by-item response rate to the paper-based questionnaire, assessing the acceptability and feasibility of the French version of the FSDS-R in the target population.
Time Frame: from March to September 2025
|
from March to September 2025
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 29BRC24.0396 - f-FSDS-R
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on The Translation of a Screening Tool
-
Emory UniversityTerminatedReliability Properties of a Concussion Screening ToolUnited States
-
European Foundation for the Care of Newborn InfantsNot yet recruitingSelf-Assessment | Development of a Tool to Assess the Level of Implementing the European Standards of Care for Newborn Health | Testing of the Developed Self-assessment Tool in European HospitalsGermany
-
University Hospital, AngersCompletedto Elaborate a New Simple Clinical Tool for the Risk of Falls Among Older Inpatients.France
-
Alison GalbraithNational Institute on Aging (NIA); Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Harvard... and other collaboratorsCompletedno Specific Condition Targeted | Use of a Price Transparency ToolUnited States
-
IVI SevillaUniversity of Seville, SpainRecruitingEstablish the Amount of CENPV Protein in Human Oocytes As a Diagnostic Tool Against Damage Caused by Ageing or by the Procedure of Vitrification of Oocytes | Advance Maternal Age | Vitrification and ThawingSpain
-
Michelle ColeTerminatedFocus of Study: The Safety of an Online Pre-assessment Tool
-
Herlev HospitalCompletedFocus of Study: Usability of a Tool for Structured Assessment of and Feedback to Trainee SurgeonsDenmark
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandActive, not recruitingEvaluation of the Impact of the MSProgress Quality Approach Support Tool on the Evolution of the Indicators Chosen by the MSPs in Comparison With Standard CareFrance
-
Inonu UniversityCompletedBeing Literate | Not Having Any Cognitive, Visual or Orthopedic Disabilities | Being Between the Ages of 50-65 | Having a Smart Phone | The Effect of Education on Cancer Screening on the Knowledge Level of Women | The Effect of Education on Cancer Screening on Women&Amp;#39;s Attitudes | The Effect...Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal CreteilNot yet recruitingthe Rate of Participation in Screening for PBC