Phase II: Engagement and Clinical Impact of the Teleo Virtual Therapy Platform in Clinical Settings

September 17, 2025 updated by: David Hong, Stanford University
This Phase II trial will examine engagement in telehealth for children undergoing psychotherapy. Specifically, the trial will examine patient engagement in Teleo, a virtual therapy platform specifically designed for psychotherapy with youth, as compared to standard video conferencing.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study aims to examine the impact of tailored telehealth psychotherapy environments on clinical outcomes in the context of pediatric mental health treatment. Researchers will conduct a full-scale RCT with 156 families to assess how Teleo compares to standard video conferencing (e.g., Zoom) on a range of clinical metrics, including cancellation/no-show rates, clinician satisfaction, duration of treatment, need for medication, and symptoms of anxiety and depression.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

156

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • California
      • Monterey, California, United States, 93940
        • Ohana Center for Child and Adolescent Behavioral Health
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with a mood and/or anxiety disorder
  • Have proficiency to participate in psychotherapy in English
  • Scheduled to begin therapy at one of the study sites
  • RCADS score > 65

Exclusion Criteria:

- Comorbid diagnosis of intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder, psychotic disorders, high-risk suicidal behaviors requiring immediate hospitalization, substance use disorders, or other physical or mental condition that would prohibit them from engaging in telehealth settings.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Teleo
Participants in this arm will undergo therapy for 12 sessions using the Teleo virtual therapy video platform. Sessions will be recorded and questionnaires and clinical data will be measured.
Therapist-led psychotherapy sessions implemented within the Teleo virtual therapy platform.
Active Comparator: Standard Videoconferencing
Participants in this group will undergo therapy for 12 sessions using standard video platforms (e.g. Zoom or Microsoft Teams). Sessions will be recorded and questionnaires and clinical data will be measured.
Therapist-led psychotherapy sessions implemented in standard (non-Teleo) video platform.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Child Involvement Rating Scale (CIRS)
Time Frame: Week 1
Observational coding questionnaire designed to assess child engagement in therapy. Consists of 6 items (4 positively-framed, 2 negatively-framed), each on a 0-5 scale. To calculate a summary score, the two negatively-framed items are reverse scored and scores on all six items are averaged. Summary scores range from 0-5, with higher scores representing greater child engagement in therapy.
Week 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
My Thoughts About Therapy Scale - Caregiver (MTT-CG)
Time Frame: Weeks 1, 6 and 12
Caregivers will complete the MTT-GC questionnaire to measure their child's engagement in psychotherapy across dimensions of the REACH client engagement framework - Relationship, Expectancy, Attendance, Clarity, and Homework. Scores range from 0-105, higher scores indicate 'better' outcome.
Weeks 1, 6 and 12
My Thoughts About Therapy Scale - Youth (MTT-Y)
Time Frame: Weeks 1, 6 and 12
Youth will complete questionnaires to measure self-reported engagement in psychotherapy across dimensions of the REACH client engagement framework - Relationship, Expectancy, Attendance, Clarity, and Homework. Scores range from 0-105, higher scores indicate 'better' outcome.
Weeks 1, 6 and 12
Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12
Caregivers will complete questionnaire to assess child participants' symptoms of anxiety and mood disorders across six dimensions: separation anxiety disorder, social phobia, generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, and low mood (major depressive disorder). Standardized T-scores will be calculated for each subscale and for the overall scale. T-scores range from 30-90, with lower scores representing better outcomes.
Baseline, Week 4, Week 12
Long-Term Cost of Care
Time Frame: 1 year post-enrollment
Treatment duration and medication use will be assessed over 1 year following participants' enrollment in the study, and used to calculate differences in average long-term cost of care between the study arms.
1 year post-enrollment
Rate of therapy session cancellations, no-shows, and treatment dropout
Time Frame: Weeks 1-12
Participants' electronic health records (EHR) will be used to track session cancellations, no-shows, and treatment dropout.
Weeks 1-12
Rate of clinician attrition
Time Frame: Weeks 1-12
Clinician attrition rates will be assessed via electronic health records (EHR).
Weeks 1-12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David S Hong, MD, Stanford University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 15, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 15, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

September 4, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 23, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 80119
  • R42MH136878 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mood Disorders

Clinical Trials on Teleo

Subscribe