Nutrition Supplement for Cystic Fibrosis

December 17, 2025 updated by: Robert DiSilvestro, Ohio State University

A Medical Nutrition Supplement for Cystic Fibrosis

The goal of this study is to learn if one nutrition supplement formula works better than a different formula in adults with cystic fibrosis. The main question being addressed is: Will certain atypical versions of certain nutrients outperform typical versions of these nutrients? This will be determined by examining blood measures of nutrient levels and/or indications of nutrient function indicators pre- and post-intervention. Participants will take the supplements for 6 weeks with a blood draw before and after that time.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background. For people with cystic fibrosis (CF), new drugs have extended life expectancy and improved quality of life. Yet, even with these improvements, people with CF still face shorter than normal life spans and constant threats of quality of life disruptions. One approach to attacking these hardships consists of treating nutritional deficiencies. However, that's not as simple as just giving standard nutrients. People with CF have trouble transporting certain nutrients from the digestive system. In theory, giving nutrients in certain forms might get past the CF associated difficulties. However, the big question is: What forms would work?

The answer to this question can vary for different nutrients. For fat soluble vitamins D and E as well as coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), which is vitamin-like in CF, the proposed solution may be to make the nutrients mix well with water (by using something called micellular versions). That's because these nutrients normally leave the digestive system into the blood by riding with ingested fats; that's a problem in CF because fat malabsorption occurs. Micellular forms could allow the nutrient to travel with water. Some micellular versions of fat soluble vitamins have been tested in people with CF, but the results were not ideal. A better approach could be to use nanoemulsion micellular versions of fat soluble nutrients.

For another nutrient, copper, there needs to not only be good absorption from the digestive system, but also a need to get the copper's to its functional molecules. This principal investigator for the current study has found that giving the normally well absorbed copper glycinate doesn't improve copper status in CF people. In contrast, this situation may be remedied by mixing copper glycinate with a well absorbed version of the nonessential nutrient curcumin (which could escort copper to the appropriate molecules).

Choline, an essential nutrient, can also be a concern for people with CF. Alpha-glyceryl phosphoryl (AGP)-choline may absorb better in these people than the more commonly used choline tartrate.

If the above mentioned non-standard nutrient forms can be shown to work better in people with CF, a new product could be made with the non-standard versions of vitamins D and E, CoQ10, copper, and choline. A formulation could also eventually include another 2 fat soluble vitamins as nanoemulsions as well as zinc + curcumin (since zinc may have the same problem-solution as copper). The product could also include other nutrients normally taken as part of a multi-nutrient supplement.

None of the hand picked versions of the nutrients noted above have been tested in CF people. Therefore, a new study will be done to test these versions for vitamins D and E, CoQ10, copper, and choline.

Hypothesis. This project seeks confirmation of this hypothesis: a formulation with non-standard nutrient versions can outperform conventional nutrients in people with CF. Positive results here can bring a product close to launch. However, one more short study in more people in another geographic location can add more launch justification. A new study can also test the utility of adding 3 nutrients that should work better in versions like those tested in the current project.

Methods. A 6 week intervention is to be used. This principal investigator has used this length in many supplement studies and found it sufficient for altering nutritional function status. For example, this principal investigator has shown a strong change in copper status after 6 weeks of supplementation. Others have seen the same thing for 6 weeks or less for studies on vitamin E.

The new study will be double blind with subjects not knowing whether they are getting the novel or standard nutrient forms. The 2 formulas being tested are as follows:

Supplement 1 Conventional Vitamin D/Vitamin E/Coenzyme Q10. Copper glycinate. Choline tartrate

Supplement 2 Nanoemulsion Vitamin D/ Vitamin E/Coenzyme Q10. Copper glycinate + curcumin. AGP Choline

Daily doses for both supplements 1500 IU Vitamin D3 200; IU Vitamin E; 100 mg Coenzyme Q10; 2.5 mg; 250 mg Choline

Endpoints will be blood assessments for the status of the various nutrients. Some other blood measures will be done that relate to some of the functional implications of improving the status of the nutrients under study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with cystic fibrosis
  • Diagnosed with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency
  • 18 years old or older
  • Currently on modulator
  • Normal liver enzyme labs

Exclusion Criteria: :

  • Non-English-speaking participants
  • Acute health crisis
  • Persistent elevation of liver enzymes >6 months (E2) (ALT >80 U/L)
  • History of liver abnormalities
  • If patients are currently taking Category A or Category B in the LiverTox categorization system
  • Recent vitamin D supplementation of 30 mcg/day or higher, vitamin E supplements of 200 IU/day or higher, or copper at 2 mg/day or higher
  • Any other concern by investigator that the subject is inappropriate for inclusion
  • Patients who is on a reduced dose of a CFTR modulator
  • Patients on azole antifungals (voriconazole, itraconazole, posaconzole, >7 days of fluconazole, etc.).
  • Patients who binge drink EtOH - for men more than 2 drinks/day, for women more than 1 drink/ day
  • Patients that are on other medications that are sensitive CYP3A4 substrates - such as tacrolimus for example
  • Patients on sensitive CYP3A4 substrates including but not limited to tacrolimus, sirolimus, and cyclosporine

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional nutrient forms
People are given a supplement with nutrient forms typically used in supplements
The intervention product would represent part of a typical supplement given to people including those with CF
Experimental: Non-common nutrient forms
People are given a supplement with nutrient forms that are not the most commonly used forms in supplements
The intervention product would represent part of a possible new supplement given to people including those with CF

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Nutrient status assessor 1
Time Frame: From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later
Plasma concentrations of 25-OH vitamin D (ng/ml)
From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later
Nutrition status assessor 2
Time Frame: From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later
Plasma concentrations of vitamin E (mg/L)
From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later
Nutrition status assessor 3
Time Frame: From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later
Plasma concentrations of CoQ10 (mg/L)
From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later
Nutrition status assessor 4
Time Frame: From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later
Plasma copper (µg/ml)
From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later
Nutrition status assessor 5
Time Frame: From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later
Plasma diamine oxidase activity (Units/L)
From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later
Nutrition status assessor 6
Time Frame: From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later
Erythrocyte copper superoxide dismutase activities (Units/ml packed cells)
From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later
Nutrition status assessor 7
Time Frame: From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later
Plasma choline (µM)
From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional implication indicator 1
Time Frame: From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later
Plasma glucose(mg/dL)
From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later
Functional implication indicator 2
Time Frame: From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later
Plasma oxidized LDL (ng/ml)
From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later
Functional implication indicator 3
Time Frame: From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later
Plasma alanine amino transferase (ALT)(Units/L)
From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later
Functional implication indicator 4
Time Frame: From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later
Plasma vitamin C-like reducing power (mg ascorbic acid equivalents/dL)
From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later
Subjective response
Time Frame: From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later
Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R): 0-100 scale with higher scores indicating better quality of life)
From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robert A Emeritus Professor, Ohio State University
  • Study Director: Karen Faculty Pulmonary Medicine Nationwide Children's Hospital, Nationwide Children's Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 28, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 27, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

September 9, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Confidentiality issues exist even if shared without identifiers

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cystic Fibrosis (CF)

Clinical Trials on Common form supplementation

Subscribe