- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07200271
- Original Trial
Surgical Management of Lateral Ankle Instability: Modified Broström-Gould Versus Arthroscopic Allograft Reconstruction of the Anterior Talofibular and Calcaneofibular Ligaments.
Surgical Management of Lateral Ankle Instability: Modified Broström-Gould Versus Arthroscopic Allograft Reconstruction of the Anterior Talofibular and Calcaneofibular Ligaments. A Randomized Stratified Clinical Trial.
Primary Objective:
To clarify whether arthroscopic reconstruction with allograft provides tangible benefits over the modified open Broström-Gould technique, or if both are equivalent in efficacy and safety. The clinical AOFAS scale will be used for assessment.
Secondary Objectives:
To determine if there are differences in health outcomes and patient-perceived pain using the specific SP-36 scale and verbal numeric rating scale (VNRS). Additionally, to assess differences in postoperative complication rates and time to return to daily life activities between the two surgical techniques.
Study Design:
Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial with two parallel groups stratified by age and functional demand.
Condition or Disorder Being Studied:
Chronic lateral ankle instability.
Study Population and Sample Size:
The target population includes subjects diagnosed with chronic lateral ankle instability. The study population consists of patients diagnosed in the Orthopedics consultations at Hospital Infanta Elena who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Based on sample size calculations, a total of 36 patients will be recruited. However, due to the prospective nature and stratification by epidemiological and functional variables, the sample size may be increased to ensure comparable groups in each stratum.
Study Timeline and Estimated Completion Date:
The study is expected to begin in the third quarter of 2025. Recruitment is estimated to last 24 months, with a follow-up period of 12 months, for a total duration of 3 years, ending in the third quarter of 2028.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Juan Chans Veres, Md, PhD
- Phone Number: +34 678133294
- Email: juan.chans@quironsalud.es
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Laura Conde Ruiz, MD
- Phone Number: +34 695155570
- Email: laura.conde@quironsalud.es
Study Locations
-
-
Madrid
-
Valdemoro, Madrid, Spain, 28342
- Recruiting
- Hospital Universitario Infanta Elena
-
Contact:
- Laura Conde Ruiz, MD
- Phone Number: +34 695155570
- Email: laura.conde@quironsalud.es
-
Contact:
- Juan Chans Veres, MD-PhD
- Phone Number: 678133294
- Email: juan.chans@quironsalud.es
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Mandatory criteria (all must be marked "yes" in a drop-down tab):
- Age >18 years
- Subjective sensation of instability
- Pathological anterior drawer and varus tilt compared to the contralateral side
- Magnetic resonance imaging showing lesion of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL)
Specific criteria (must meet at least one, but can meet several, multiple choice option):
- BMI >30
- High athletic demand (regularly participates in pivoting sports)
- Ligamentous hyperlaxity (Beighton score >8)
- First sprain more than 2 years ago
- More than 5 sprains per year
- Subfibular ossicle >1 cm
- MRI with ATFL showing high T2 signal
- MRI showing disruption/absence of ATFL
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of previous ankle surgery
- Tibiotalar osteoarthritis or presence of chondral lesions on magnetic resonance imaging
- Active infections
- Contraindications for surgery
- Pregnancy
- Lactation
- Known allergy to bovine collagen
- Autoimmune connective tissue disease
- Active oncological process
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Open surgery arm
Open surgery consists of the modified Broström-Gould technique, which allows for the reconstruction of damaged ligaments using the patient's own tissues through an incision on the lateral side of the fibula.
|
Open surgery consists of the modified Broström-Gould technique, which allows for the reconstruction of damaged ligaments using the patient's own tissues through an incision on the lateral side of the fibula.
This technique has shown satisfactory functional results.
|
|
Active Comparator: Arthroscopic surgery
Arthroscopic reconstruction with allograft is a surgery in which a tendon (generally from a tissue bank) is used to reconstruct the ligaments.
This technique is performed through small incisions using arthroscopy
|
Arthroscopic reconstruction with allograft, in which a tendon (generally from a tissue bank) is used to reconstruct the ligaments.
This technique is performed through small incisions using arthroscopy.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clarify whether arthroscopic reconstruction with allograft provides tangible benefits over the modified open Broström-Gould technique, or if both are equivalent in efficacy and safety.
Time Frame: From surgery to the end of the follow up at 12 months after surgery
|
Clarify whether arthroscopic reconstruction with allograft provides tangible benefits over the modified open Broström-Gould technique, or if both are equivalent in efficacy and safety.
For this purpose, the clinical AOFAS (American Orthopedics Foot and Ankle Score) score will be used.
The minimum value for the AOFAS score is 0 and the maximum value is 100.
Higher scores on the AOFAS scale indicate a better outcome, meaning less pain, better function, and improved alignment.
|
From surgery to the end of the follow up at 12 months after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Determine whether there are differences in health outcomes
Time Frame: From surgery to the end of the follow up at 12 months after surgery
|
Determine whether there are differences in health outcomes using the specific SP-36 (Short Form Health Survey) scale, is a 36-item questionnaire designed to measure health-related quality of life, it measures eight items: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems and mental health.
The score goes from 0 (worst health status) to 100 (best health status).
|
From surgery to the end of the follow up at 12 months after surgery
|
|
Determine whether there are differences in patient-perceived pain
Time Frame: From surgery to the end of the follow up at 12 months after surgery
|
Determine whether there are differences in patient-perceived pain by using verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS).
This score is widely used tool for assessing pain intensity, it measures pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst paing imaginable).
|
From surgery to the end of the follow up at 12 months after surgery
|
|
Determine whether there are differences between both groups in the rate of postoperative complications.
Time Frame: From surgery to the end of the follow up at 12 months after surgery
|
Determine whether there are differences between both groups in the rate of postoperative complications, defined as: Delay or absence of surgical wound healing, superficial infection, deep infection, recurrence or persistence of instability, sural nerve and superficial peroneal nerve neuropathy and complex regional pain syndrome.
They are all qualitative variables.
They will be expressed in the categories: yes or no.
|
From surgery to the end of the follow up at 12 months after surgery
|
|
Determine whether there are differences in time to return to normal life between the two surgical techniques.
Time Frame: From surgery to the end of the follow up at 12 months after surgery
|
Determine whether there are differences in the time to return to normal life between the two surgical techniques.
To do this, we will compare both groups in terms of time expressed in days.
|
From surgery to the end of the follow up at 12 months after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Juan Chans Veres, MD-PhD, Hospital Universitario Infanta Elena
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- INEST2025
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Ankle Sprain
-
University of LahoreCompletedAnkle Sprain 1St Degree | Ankle Sprain 2Nd Degree | Lateral Ankle SprainPakistan
-
Decathlon SEEFOR, FranceTerminatedAnkle Sprain 1St Degree | Ankle Sprain 2Nd Degree | Ankle Sprain 3Rd DegreeFrance
-
Université Catholique de LouvainCompletedAnkle Sprain 1St Degree | Ankle Sprain 2Nd DegreeBelgium
-
National Defense Medical Center, TaiwanTri-Service General HospitalRecruitingAnkle Sprain 2Nd Degree | Ankle Sprain 3Rd DegreeTaiwan
-
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro SocialCompletedAnkle Sprain | Ankle Sprain 1St Degree | Ankle Sprain 2Nd DegreeMexico
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterWithdrawnMusculoskeletal Injury | Ankle Sprain 1St Degree | Ankle Sprain 2Nd DegreeUnited States
-
University of VirginiaNational Athletic Training Association Research & Education FoundationUnknownLateral Ankle SprainUnited States
-
Rehabilitation Centre ZivotRecruiting
-
Université Catholique de LouvainUZ Leuven, campus Pellenberg (Belgium)CompletedChronic Ankle Instability | Lateral Ankle SprainBelgium
Clinical Trials on Open surgery
-
Shoichi Fujii, MD, PhDUnknownColorectal CancerJapan
-
Cai KailinUnknownLocally Advanced Gastric CancerChina
-
International Study Group on Minimally Invasive...Fondazione CARIT; LOGIX S.r.l.Unknown
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalCompletedPancreatic Neuroendocrine TumorsChina
-
Peking University People's HospitalNot yet recruitingEndometrial Carcinoma | Tumor Molecular Features Screening Model
-
Ruijin HospitalShanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineRecruitingPancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Minimally Invasive SurgeryChina
-
University of CatanzaroUnknownSurgery | Outcome, Fatal | Abdominal Aortic AneurysmItaly
-
Beijing Friendship HospitalUnknown
-
Giresun UniversityCompletedPostoperative Pain | Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedure | Patient Discharge | Lateral Malleolus FractureTurkey
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreMcMaster University; Unity Health Toronto; University of Toronto; University of... and other collaboratorsCompleted