Low-Count Quantitative SPECT for Men Treated With Radium-223

April 20, 2026 updated by: Washington University School of Medicine

Internal radiotherapies (radiolabeled molecules that are systemically administered and localize to sites of disease) provide cancer-ablating doses to diseased cells while sparing adjacent normal tissues. [223Ra]RaCl2 (Xofigo) is the first FDA-approved alpha-particle emitting radiopharmaceutical therapy (αRPT), providing a survival benefit for men with bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Systemically administered radiotherapies distribute throughout the patient, accumulating to unknown levels at sites of disease and in radiosensitive vital organs. The whole-body distribution means that absorbed doses in the patient extend far beyond a pre-defined treatment field. There is a lack of information about αRPT distribution and localization, and this confounds treatment monitoring, complicates dose and schedule personalization, and impedes drug development.

Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging offers a mechanism to quantify uptake; however, αRPT administered activities are significantly lower than those used with diagnostic procedures, which presents a challenge for quantitation with conventional methods. Preliminary research shows that low-count quantitative SPECT (LC-QSPECT) imaging demonstrates reliable quantitation of regional uptake for αRPTs. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility, tolerability and performance of LC-QSPECT imaging.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

38

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Abhinav K Jha, Ph.D.
  • Phone Number: 314-273-2655
  • Email: a.jha@wustl.edu

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • St Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University School of Medicine
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Tyler J Fraum, M.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jingqin (Rosy) Luo, Ph.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Richard Laforest, Ph.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Hiram Gay, M.D.
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Abhinav K Jha, Ph.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Daniel Thorek, Ph.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Richard L Wahl, M.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria - Patients:

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed castration-resistant prostate cancer with symptomatic bone metastases.
  • Minimum detectable skeletal lesion count of 3.
  • Eligible to receive Xofigo.
  • At least 18 years of age.
  • ECOG performance status ≤ 3.
  • Ability to understand and willingness to sign an IRB-approved written informed consent document. Legally authorized representatives may sign and give informed consent on behalf of study participants.

Exclusion Criteria - Patients:

  • Predominant visceral metastatic disease.
  • Prior or concurrent malignancy whose natural history has the potential to interfere with the safety or efficacy assessment of the investigational regimen. Patients with prior or concurrent malignancy that does NOT meet that definition are eligible for this trial
  • Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to: ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, or cardiac arrhythmia.
  • Concurrent alternative radiopharmaceuticals
  • Inability to maintain stationary supine pose for 45-60 minutes

Eligibility Criteria - Physicians:

  • Medical Oncologist or Radiation Oncologist at Siteman Cancer Center.
  • Treating patients with prostate cancer.
  • Willing to complete Physician Questionnaire during participation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: LC-QSPECT
Consenting and eligible men receiving standard of care (Xofigo) will receive a noninvasive LC-QSPECT scan (~45 minutes) and a low-dose contrast-enhanced CT after Cycles 1 and 3 of Xofigo. SOC CT and bone scans will also be performed at baseline and after Cycles 3 and 6. Specimen collection will be as follows: bone biopsy (Cycle 1 Day 2) (optional), stool (first bowel movement post-each SPECT scan), and blood for PSA and bone turnover biomarkers (with each cycle of treatment). Additionally, pain will be assessed, and quality of life will be monitored prior to treatment and after each treatment cycle.
LC-QSPECT scans will be performed between 6 and 36 hours after administration of Xofigo during Cycles 1 and 3.
Other Names:
  • LC-QSPECT
No Intervention: Physicians
Additionally, medical oncologists and radiation oncologists who are seeing patients who are enrolled in this study will be considered participants in this study (as they will be completing the Physician Questionnaire).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Spearman's correlation coefficient between the LC-QSPECT estimated uptake in the lesions and intestine with ex vivo activity sampling
Time Frame: Through collection of ex vivo sample (estimated to be 3 months)
The investigators will assess if the correlation (in absolute magnitude) ≥ 0.60 between the tissue and SPECT data against a low correlation of < 0.2 based on 1-sided normal test at a 5% level.
Through collection of ex vivo sample (estimated to be 3 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
LC-QSPECT related adverse events
Time Frame: From start of LC-QSPECT imaging through 12 hours following LC-QSPECT imaging
From start of LC-QSPECT imaging through 12 hours following LC-QSPECT imaging
Percentage of enrolled patients who withdraw from the study due to adverse events at least possibly related to LC-QSPECT (as chosen by patients or treating physician team)
Time Frame: From start of LC-QSPECT imaging through 12 hours following LC-QSPECT imaging
From start of LC-QSPECT imaging through 12 hours following LC-QSPECT imaging
Feasibility of conducting LC-QSPECT will be determined by percentage of SPECT scans that can be processed using the investigators' computational method
Time Frame: Through completion of LC-QSPECT imaging (estimated to be 3 months)
Feasibility is defined as at least 80% of scans able to be processed.
Through completion of LC-QSPECT imaging (estimated to be 3 months)
Correlation between the LC-QSPECT measurements and PSA (Spearman Correlation Coefficient)
Time Frame: Through completion of Xofigo treatment (estimated to be 6 months)
Spearman correlation coefficient measures the strength and direction of the linear correlation (dependence) between 2 variables after converting the raw data to ranks, giving a value between +1 and -1 inclusive, where 1 indicates perfect positive correlation, 0 indicates no correlation, and -1 indicates perfect negative correlation.
Through completion of Xofigo treatment (estimated to be 6 months)
Correlation between the LC-QSPECT measurements and PSA doubling time (Spearman Correlation Coefficient)
Time Frame: Through completion of Xofigo treatment (estimated to be 6 months)
Spearman correlation coefficient measures the strength and direction of the linear correlation (dependence) between 2 variables after converting the raw data to ranks, giving a value between +1 and -1 inclusive, where 1 indicates perfect positive correlation, 0 indicates no correlation, and -1 indicates perfect negative correlation.
Through completion of Xofigo treatment (estimated to be 6 months)
Correlation between the LC-QSPECT measurements and bone-turnover markers (Spearman Correlation Coefficient)
Time Frame: Through completion of Xofigo treatment (estimated to be 6 months)
Spearman correlation coefficient measures the strength and direction of the linear correlation (dependence) between 2 variables after converting the raw data to ranks, giving a value between +1 and -1 inclusive, where 1 indicates perfect positive correlation, 0 indicates no correlation, and -1 indicates perfect negative correlation.
Through completion of Xofigo treatment (estimated to be 6 months)
Correlation between the LC-QSPECT measurements and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) questionnaire (Spearman Correlation Coefficient)
Time Frame: Through completion of Xofigo treatment (estimated to be 6 months)
  • Spearman correlation coefficient measures the strength and direction of the linear correlation (dependence) between 2 variables after converting the raw data to ranks, giving a value between +1 and -1 inclusive, where 1 indicates perfect positive correlation, 0 indicates no correlation, and -1 indicates perfect negative correlation.
  • The FACT-P scale is a tool used for assessing the health-related quality of life (QoL) in men with prostate cancer. It consists of 27 core items which assess patient function in four domains (Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional well-being), and it is further supplemented by 12 site specific items to assess for prostate-related symptoms. Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert type scale, and then combined to produce a global QoL score, with a range of scores of 0 to 156. Higher scores represent better QoL.
Through completion of Xofigo treatment (estimated to be 6 months)
Correlation between the LC-QSPECT measurements and EuroQol-5 (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire (Spearman Correlation Coefficient)
Time Frame: Through completion of Xofigo treatment (estimated to be 6 months)
  • Spearman correlation coefficient measures the strength and direction of the linear correlation (dependence) between 2 variables after converting the raw data to ranks, giving a value between +1 and -1 inclusive, where 1 indicates perfect positive correlation, 0 indicates no correlation, and -1 indicates perfect negative correlation.
  • EQ-5D-5L is a descriptive system for health-related quality of life states in adults, consisting of five dimensions (Mobility, Self-care, Usual activities, Pain & discomfort, Anxiety & depression), each of which has five severity levels that are described by statements appropriate to that dimension. Scale Minimum: 0. Scale Maximum: 100. Higher score indicates better outcome.
Through completion of Xofigo treatment (estimated to be 6 months)
Correlation between the LC-QSPECT measurements and Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) questionnaire (Spearman Correlation Coefficient)
Time Frame: Through completion of Xofigo treatment (estimated to be 6 months)
  • Spearman correlation coefficient measures the strength and direction of the linear correlation (dependence) between 2 variables after converting the raw data to ranks, giving a value between +1 and -1 inclusive, where 1 indicates perfect positive correlation, 0 indicates no correlation, and -1 indicates perfect negative correlation.
  • BPI score ranges from 0 to 10 with a higher score denoting a higher pain severity.
Through completion of Xofigo treatment (estimated to be 6 months)
Correlation between the LC-QSPECT measurements and bone turnover (Spearman Correlation Coefficient)
Time Frame: Through completion of Xofigo treatment (estimated to be 6 months)
Spearman correlation coefficient measures the strength and direction of the linear correlation (dependence) between 2 variables after converting the raw data to ranks, giving a value between +1 and -1 inclusive, where 1 indicates perfect positive correlation, 0 indicates no correlation, and -1 indicates perfect negative correlation.
Through completion of Xofigo treatment (estimated to be 6 months)
Percentage of times that the use of the LC-QSPECT procedure resulted in any changes in treatment plans of the patients
Time Frame: Through completion of Xofigo treatment (estimated to be 6 months)
Through completion of Xofigo treatment (estimated to be 6 months)
Performance of the LC-QSPECT procedure using a no-gold-standard evaluation technique.
Time Frame: Through completion of LC-QSPECT imaging (estimated to be 3 months)
  • The investigators will use the no-gold-standard technique to assess whether the LC-QSPECT technique yields precise performance on the task of isotope uptake quantification, where slope and noise will be estimated and the noise-to-slope ratio (NSR) will be calculated.
  • The no-gold-standard technique can be found here: Jha AK, Caffo B, Frey EC. A no-gold-standard technique for objective assessment of quantitative nuclear-medicine imaging methods. Phys Med Biol. 2016 Apr 7;61(7):2780-800. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/7/2780. Epub 2016 Mar 16. PMID: 26982626; PMCID: PMC4921224 and here: Yan Liu, Ziping Liu, Zekun Li, Daniel Thorek, Barry Siegel, Abhinav Jha, "No-gold-standard evaluation of quantitative SPECT methods for alpha-particle radiopharmaceutical therapy", Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2023, 64 (supplement 1) P1331
Through completion of LC-QSPECT imaging (estimated to be 3 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Abhinav K Jha, Ph.D., Washington University School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 25, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

October 28, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Deidentified SPECT imaging data, quantitative imaging metrics, and limited clinical variables (e.g., demographics, treatment cycle, administered activity, relevant lab values, clinical outcome measures) may be shared with qualified researchers at academic, nonprofit, or industry institutions for secondary analyses of image data, dosimetry, quantitative modeling, or clinical outcomes related to Radium-223 therapy.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 12 months after publication of primary results; available for at least 5 years.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be shared through a controlled-access repository. Access will require a brief proposal and a signed data use agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on Low-count quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography imaging

Subscribe