- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07224503
C-SMART vs BE Well for Patients With Brain Tumors
Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial of C-SMART Versus BE Well for Patients With Brain Tumors on Neurocognitive and Neuroimaging Outcomes
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the acceptability and feasibility of Cognitive Strategies, Mindfulness, and Rehabilitation Therapy (C-SMART) and Brain health Education and Wellness (BE Well) in adults with brain tumors and their caregivers.
Participants will be assigned to one of the two groups:
- Cognitive Strategies, Mindfulness, and Rehabilitation Therapy (C-SMART) is a recently developed virtual intervention combining both cognitive rehabilitation with mindfulness meditation training. The manualized program consists of 8 weekly 1:1 tele intervention sessions, targeting cognitive weaknesses identified from baseline cognitive testing.
- Brain health Education and Wellness (BE Well) intervention consists of 8 weekly videos focused on maximizing brain health in the context of brain tumor.
Participants will also be asked to:
- participate in two in-person visits involving an MRI and neurocognitive tests
- complete a survey the the beginning and end of the study
- if in BE Well group, answer a few questions after watching each video
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Sarah Braun, Ph.D
- Phone Number: 804-628-7028
- Email: sarah.braun@vcuhealth.org
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Brighton Payne, BS
- Phone Number: 804-628-6799
- Email: brightonph@vcu.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Virginia
-
Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23298
- Recruiting
- Virginia Commonwealth University
-
Contact:
- Sarah Braun, Ph.D
- Phone Number: 804-628-7028
- Email: sarah.braun@vcuhealth.org
-
Principal Investigator:
- Sarah Braun, Ph.D
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Patient Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient of Virginia Commonwealth University Neuro-Oncology clinic
- Confirmed primary brain tumor diagnosis by histology or neuro-oncologist review of imaging
- At least one domain of neurocognitive function >1.5 SD below the average or the individual's estimated premorbid functioning, using the expanded International Cognition and Cancer Task Force (ICCTF) clinical trials battery and Test of Premorbid Functioning62 for comparison; (3) >1 month post brain surgery and/or radiation therapy, if applicable;
- Estimated premorbid intelligence >75.
- Patients must be age 18+ and
- Primarily English speaking.
Patient Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of major neurocognitive impairment that would prevent participation in the intervention, and/or severe aphasia, and/or inability to understand and provide informed consent
- Inability to attend weekly telehealth appointments
- Clinically significant insomnia symptoms coupled with report that insomnia is more interfering than cognitive symptoms
- < 1 month post brain surgery and/or radiation therapy
- Unstable internet connection or an inability to work teleconferencing software. Participants will be supplied an iPad if they do not have an adequate device.
- Participants cannot have metal in their body as the MRI scan could cause them harm
- If female of childbearing years, they cannot be pregnant as the MRI scan may pose risk to the unborn fetus
Caregiver Inclusion Criteria
- Must enroll with a patient (see criteria above)
- Must be age 18+ and
- Primarily English speaking
Caregiver Exclusion Criteria
-N/A
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Cognitive Strategies, Mindfulness, and Rehabilitation Therapy (C-SMART) - Patient
Modular tele-neuropsychological rehabilitation blending both cognitive rehabilitation with integrated mindfulness meditation training.
|
Eight weekly, 45-60 minute, 1:1 tele-intervention sessions, targeting neurocognitive weaknesses identified from baseline cognitive testing
|
|
Experimental: Cognitive Strategies, Mindfulness, and Rehabilitation Therapy (C-SMART) - Caregiver
Modular tele-neuropsychological rehabilitation blending both cognitive rehabilitation with integrated mindfulness meditation training.
|
Eight weekly, 45-60 minute, 1:1 tele-intervention sessions, targeting neurocognitive weaknesses identified from baseline cognitive testing
|
|
Experimental: Brain health Education and Wellness (BE Well) - Patient
Time-matched educational videos focused on maximizing brain health in the context of brain tumor.
|
Eight weekly 45- to 60-minute video lectures
|
|
Experimental: Brain health Education and Wellness (BE Well) - Caregiver
Time-matched educational videos focused on maximizing brain health in the context of brain tumor.
|
Eight weekly 45- to 60-minute video lectures
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Assess the feasibility of the C-SMART and BE Well protocols in brain tumor patients- Eligibility Rate
Time Frame: From time participant indicates interest to screening completion, 4 weeks
|
The percentage of participants that are eligible to enroll
|
From time participant indicates interest to screening completion, 4 weeks
|
|
Assess the feasibility of the C-SMART and BE Well protocols in brain tumor patients - Enrollment Rate
Time Frame: From screening to intervention initiation, 8 weeks
|
The percentage of participants that enroll
|
From screening to intervention initiation, 8 weeks
|
|
Assess the feasibility of the C-SMART and BE Well protocols in brain tumor patients -- retention rate
Time Frame: From baseline to end of study, 28 weeks
|
The percentage of participants that complete the post-intervention data collection
|
From baseline to end of study, 28 weeks
|
|
Assess the acceptability of the C-SMART and BE Well protocols in brain tumor patients -- intervention completion rate
Time Frame: From baseline to end of intervention, 16 weeks
|
The percentage of participants that complete the the protocol assigned interventions
|
From baseline to end of intervention, 16 weeks
|
|
Assess the acceptability of the C-SMART and BE Well protocols in brain tumor patients - Participant satisfaction ratings
Time Frame: From baseline to post-intervention survey completion, 20 weeks
|
Participant ratings of satisfaction.
Participants will rate the following questions on a scale from completely disagree to completely agree: C-SMART/BE Well Meets my approval; C-SMART/BE Well is appealing to the patient; "I like C-SMART/BE Well"; "I welcome C-SMART/BE Well".
Additionally, participants will answer the following question on a scale from extremely dissatisfied to extremely satisfied: "When you signed up for the study, you were told that you would be randomized to either C-SMART or BE Well Videos.
How satisfied are you with the group you were randomized to?"
|
From baseline to post-intervention survey completion, 20 weeks
|
|
Assess the acceptability of the C-SMART and BE Well protocols in brain tumor patients - Participant recommendation ratings.
Time Frame: From baseline to post-intervention survey completion, 20 weeks
|
Participant ratings of intervention recommendation Participants will answer the following question: Would "you" (the patient) recommend C-SMART/BE Well to other brain tumor patients?
|
From baseline to post-intervention survey completion, 20 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Investigate effect of interventions on neurocognitive tests Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (verbal learning and memory)
Time Frame: Baseline to post-intervention assessment, up to 28 weeks
|
Changes in neurocognitive assessment scores (pre vs post intervention) between groups based on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (verbal learning and memory) neurocognitive test.
Participant performance on the verbal learning and memory task will consist of three learning trials and a delay.
A high score on the learning trials but a very low score on the delayed recall would show that the person can learn but has difficulty retrieving previously learned information.
|
Baseline to post-intervention assessment, up to 28 weeks
|
|
Investigate effect of interventions on neurocognitive test Controlled Oral Word Association (verbal fluency)
Time Frame: Baseline to post-intervention assessment, up to 28 weeks
|
Changes in neurocognitive assessment scores (pre vs post intervention) between groups based on the Controlled Oral Word Association (verbal fluency) neurocognitive test.
Participant performance on the verbal fluency task will consist of generating words in 60 seconds on phonemic trials (words that start with a specific letter) and semantic trials (words that fall into a specific category).
Scores are the number of correctly retrieved words.
A higher raw score indicates greater verbal fluency.
|
Baseline to post-intervention assessment, up to 28 weeks
|
|
Investigate effect of interventions on neurocognitive test Trail Making (attention and task switching)
Time Frame: Baseline to post-intervention assessment, up to 28 weeks
|
Changes in neurocognitive assessment scores (pre vs post intervention) between groups based on Trail Making (processing speed and task switching).
Participant performance will consist of time (in seconds) to complete a processing speed and switching task in which participants are asked to draw lines in sequential order, and then switch between two overlearned sequences.
A shorter time to completion would indicate greater processing speed and task switching.
|
Baseline to post-intervention assessment, up to 28 weeks
|
|
Investigate effect of interventions on subjective cognition
Time Frame: Baseline to post-intervention assessment, up to 20 weeks
|
Changes in subjective cognition (pre vs post intervention) between groups based on the Neuro-Qol Short Form the National Institutes of Health (NIH) toolbox.
Participants rate their experience of cognitive slips on 4 questions from "never" to "very often", and 4 questions from "no difficulty" to "cannot do".
Higher scores indicate greater subjective cognition.
Scores range from 8-40.
Raw scores can be converted into standardized scores (T-scores) with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10.
Thus, a person who has a T-score of 60 is one SD above the average of the US general population.
|
Baseline to post-intervention assessment, up to 20 weeks
|
|
Investigate effect of interventions on fatigue
Time Frame: Baseline to post-intervention assessment, up to 20 weeks
|
Changes in fatigue (pre vs post intervention) between groups based on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue short form.
Participants rate their experience of fatigue on 4 items from "not at all" to "very much".
Higher scores indicate greater fatigue.
Scores range from 4-20.
Raw scores can be converted into standardized scores (T-scores) with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10.
Thus, a person who has a T-score of 60 is one SD above the average of the US general population.
|
Baseline to post-intervention assessment, up to 20 weeks
|
|
Structural brain changes
Time Frame: From baseline to post-outcome assessment, 28 weeks
|
Change in brain volume (pre vs. post intervention) between groups based on brain imaging (MRI) data.
The volume of lateral ventricle in the hemisphere opposite to the tumor will be measured, using 3D Slicer (https://www.slicer.org) to calculate the ventricular volume at each time point which will serve as an index of diffuse cerebral volume loss.
|
From baseline to post-outcome assessment, 28 weeks
|
|
Assess the feasibility of the C-SMART and BE Well protocols in caregivers of brain tumor - Enrollment Rate
Time Frame: From screening to intervention initiation, 8 weeks
|
The percentage of participants that enroll
|
From screening to intervention initiation, 8 weeks
|
|
Assess the feasibility of the C-SMART and BE Well protocols in caregivers of brain tumor patients -- retention rate
Time Frame: From baseline to end of study, 28 weeks
|
The percentage of participants that complete the post-intervention data collection
|
From baseline to end of study, 28 weeks
|
|
Assess the acceptability of the C-SMART and BE Well protocols in caregivers of brain tumor patients - Participant satisfaction ratings
Time Frame: From baseline to post-intervention survey completion, 20 weeks
|
Participant ratings of satisfaction.
Participants will rate the following questions on a scale from completely disagree to completely agree: C-SMART/BE Well Meets my approval; C-SMART/BE Well is appealing to the patient; "I like C-SMART/BE Well"; "I welcome C-SMART/BE Well".
Additionally, participants will answer the following question on a scale from extremely dissatisfied to extremely satisfied: "When you signed up for the study, you were told that your loved one would be randomized to either C-SMART or BE Well Videos.
How satisfied are you with the group your loved one was randomized to?"
|
From baseline to post-intervention survey completion, 20 weeks
|
|
Assess the acceptability of the C-SMART and BE Well protocols in caregivers of brain tumor patients - Participant recommendation ratings.
Time Frame: From baseline to post-intervention survey completion, 20 weeks
|
Participant ratings of intervention recommendation.
Participants will answer the following question: Would "you" (the caregiver) recommend C-SMART/BE Well to other caregivers?
|
From baseline to post-intervention survey completion, 20 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sarah Braun, Ph.D, Virginia Commonwealth University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- MCC-25-22557
- HM300000218 (Other Identifier: Virginia Commonwealth University)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Brain Tumor
-
GT Medical Technologies, Inc.RecruitingBrain Tumor | Brain Tumor, Recurrent | Brain Tumor, Primary | Brain Tumor - Metastatic | Brain Tumor, Adult: Glioblastoma | Brain Tumor, Adult MeningiomaUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoGilead SciencesCompletedBrain Cancer | Malignant Brain Tumor | Brain Tumor Adult | Recurrent Brain Tumor | Progressive Malignant Brain Tumor | Brain Tumor, PediatricUnited States
-
Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University...CNOG-MC001 Collaborative GroupCompletedPediatric Brain Tumor | Malignant Brain Tumor | Tumors, Central Nervous System | Benign Brain TumorChina
-
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation...Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Nottingham University... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingPediatric Brain Tumor | Childhood Brain Tumor | Childhood Brain Tumors | Pediatric Brain NeoplasmsUnited Kingdom
-
Technical University of MunichRecruiting
-
Washington University School of MedicineUnited States Department of Defense; The Foundation for Barnes-Jewish Hospital and other collaboratorsRecruitingBrain Tumor, PrimaryUnited States
-
University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical SchoolNot yet recruitingBrain Tumor, Primary | Brain Tumor - MetastaticGermany
-
University of NebraskaRecruitingPrimary Brain Tumor | Metastatic Brain TumorUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoNot yet recruitingBrain Tumor | Brain Tumor, Primary | Brain Tumor Adult | Brain Metastases From Solid TumorsUnited States
-
Washington University School of MedicineThe Andrew McDonough B+ Foundation; Children's Discovery Institute; Neurosurgery...Recruiting
Clinical Trials on C-SMART
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityAmerican Cancer Society, Inc.; American Psychological FoundationCompletedBrain Tumor | Mild Neurocognitive Disorder | Glioma, MixedUnited States
-
Inje UniversityCompletedBRONCHIAL ASTHMAKorea, Republic of
-
Indiana UniversityRecruiting
-
Medical University of South CarolinaBoston Scientific CorporationRecruitingSubcutaneous ICD | Myopotential InterferenceUnited States
-
Massachusetts General HospitalElizabeth Dole FoundationCompleted
-
University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignCompleted
-
Pathway Medtech, LLC.Haku TechnologyRecruitingSleep Apnea | Sleep Quality | Sleep-disordered Breathing (SDB)Belgium
-
University of California, San FranciscoSan Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical CenterCompletedPost Traumatic Stress DisorderUnited States
-
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute...RecruitingPTSD | Post-traumatic Stress DisorderCanada