Deprescribing in Outpatient Internal Medicine Practices

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of pharmacist-led medication reviews and deprescribing or de-escalation interventions on reducing the number of medications, falls, and hospitalizations, and improvement in quality of life in geriatric patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

With increasing age, key pharmacokinetic processes such as first-pass metabolism, bioavailability, drug distribution, and clearance, are affected, necessitating dose adjustments and careful medication management. Despite these risks, medication regimens in elderly patients are often left unchanged over time. Deprescribing, the intentional reduction or discontinuation of medications, has been shown to improve quality of life, reduce fall risk, minimize cognitive impairment, and decrease adverse drug interactions. In this analysis, the PharmD will perform a comprehensive medication review with the patient and collaborate with the provider and patient through shared decision making to deprescribe and/or dose reduce medication therapy where risks may outweigh benefits for the patient.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 75 years or older
  • taking 6 or more medications

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients in hospice or palliative care
  • in Skilled Nursing Facility
  • receiving cancer/oncology treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: medication review - deprescribing / de-escalation may occur
Internal medicine providers and PharmDs will identify patients for whom a medication review and potential deprescribing / de-escalation intervention may be beneficial, and make recommendations to adjust therapy as appropriate.
Internal medicine providers and PharmDs will identify patients for whom a medication review and potential deprescribing / de-escalation intervention may be beneficial.
Other Names:
  • potential deprescribing / de-escalation
No Intervention: historical controls
No contact or intervention will be made with these patients, only retrospective chart review to gather data such as number of medications, hospitalizations, and falls. Patients included in the historical control arm will be matched to the intervention group based on sex, age, and number of medications as much as possible. The goal will be to include 50 patients in both the intervention and control arms.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in number of medications
Time Frame: Month 3
Change in number of medications
Month 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Medication Appropriateness Index scores
Time Frame: Month 3

The Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) score is a quantitative measure of prescribing appropriateness, where lower scores indicate more appropriate medication use, and higher scores indicate less appropriate use.

Each criterion is rated on a 3-point scale:

Appropriate (score of 0 or a low value) Each criterion is assigned a weight ranging from 1 to 3, with a maximum total score of 18 possible per drug.

A summated score can be calculated for a patient by combining the scores for all their medications. This summated score is not standardized, meaning the potential total score depends on the number of medications the patient is taking. A score of 0 for a medication indicates ideal or appropriate prescribing for that specific criterion. Higher scores are associated with potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use, increased risk of adverse drug events (ADEs), higher rates of unscheduled ambulatory or emergency department visits, and lower health-related quality of life.

Month 3
Change in Quality of life scores
Time Frame: Month 3
The Lübeck Medication Satisfaction Questionnaire (LMSQ) is scored by calculating the average score for each of its six subscales, which are based on three Likert-scale items each. Patients rate their agreement with each statement on a four-point scale (1=strongly disagree, 4=strongly agree), but items phrased negatively must be reverse-scored before calculating the subscale average. To get the subscale score, you sum the three items' scores and divide by three.
Month 3
Number of documented falls
Time Frame: Month 3
Number of documented falls
Month 3
Number of documented hospitalizations
Time Frame: Month 3
Number of documented hospitalizations
Month 3
Number of documented visits to Primary Care Physician office
Time Frame: Month 3
Number of documented visits to Primary Care Physician office
Month 3

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Pharmacist interventions
Time Frame: Month 3
Documented via Medication therapy problems (MTP) tracking -
Month 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Julia Clements, PharmD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 12, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 6, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

May 6, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 10, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 12, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2026

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Deprescribing

Clinical Trials on medication review

Subscribe