Supporting Families in the ICU (SF-ICU)

May 4, 2026 updated by: Alexia M. Torke, Indiana University

Supporting Families in the ICU: The Chaplain Family Project Multicenter RCT

The overarching goal of our work is to test the effect of high-quality spiritual care for ICU family surrogates on outcomes of psychological and spiritual well-being and medical decision making. Our team has developed an approach to high quality spiritual care intervention for ICU surrogates, called the Spiritual Care Assessment and Intervention (SCAI) framework, which is delivered by a chaplain interventionist to ICU surrogates.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To prepare for a fully powered, multi-center study, we propose a 2-arm, attention controlled, randomized pilot trial of high-quality spiritual care for 64 surrogates at 2 additional US medical centers.

Specific Aims are:

  1. To determine the feasibility and acceptability of all aspects of the study, including enrollment, randomization, delivery of the SCAI framework (e.g., chaplain intervention) and attention control conditions, acceptability, and outcome assessments, in preparation for a larger, Stage III effectiveness trial.
  2. To test the effects of spiritual care on the primary outcome of anxiety (GAD-7) and the secondary outcomes of surrogate spiritual well-being and satisfaction with spiritual care (FACIT-Sp-non-illness version, Satisfaction with Care-Chaplain), and decision making for the patient, including the process of decision making and the medical care received by the patient.
  3. To study the experience of spiritual care from the perspective of surrogates who are religious and those who are not, those of different faiths, and those who describe themselves as spiritual but not religious.

Because chaplains are common in the ICU this intervention is highly scalable. Results will guide hospital leaders, policy makers and the healthcare team regarding how to deploy chaplains to improve surrogates' psychological and spiritual health and the quality of decisions for critically ill patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

We will enroll patient/surrogate dyads.

Patients will be eligible if:

  • They are age 18 or older at the time of screening.
  • They are judged to lack decisional capacity based on either:

a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 8 or less; or a GCS of 9-13 with at least one secondary criterion (intubation, sedation, delirium, or noted by clinicians to be unresponsive, comatose or unable to follow commands).

* They have an eligible surrogate willing to participate.

Surrogates will be eligible if:

  • They are age 18 or older,
  • They are considered the legally authorized representative (LAR) based on prior appointment by the patient or each state's medical consent law.

Patient/surrogate dyads will be ineligible if:

* They are unable to complete enrollment activities within 96 hours of admission to the ICU.

Patients will be ineligible if:

  • They are being discharged from the ICU within 24 hours.
  • They are intubated for surgery but expected to be extubated soon (typically within 24 hours).
  • They are imminently dying or have a planned terminal wean.

Surrogates will be ineligible if:

*They are unable to complete study procedures in English.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention (SCAI Framework)
Participants in this arm will receive the chaplain led intervention of the Spiritual Care Assessment and Intervention (SCAI) framework.

The SCAI intervention includes three visits generally scheduled 48-72 hours apart. After three visits, the chaplain will contact the surrogate at least weekly for the remainder of the hospitalization. If the patient dies, the chaplain will conduct a bereavement visit.

The SCAI framework addresses four dimensions of spirituality. If all four dimensions are not addressed, they may be assessed during follow-up visits. If all four dimensions are addressed during the initial visit, other visits include at least one question from any dimension.

The SCAI framework includes a list of common spiritual care interventions developed based on clinical experience and literature review.. Based on our conceptual framework, interventions are either are emotionally supportive, address spiritual or religious dimensions of care, or address information support such as exploring the meaning of medical events. Consistent with chaplain standards, the chaplain selects and tailors these interventions.

Active Comparator: Control (ICU Guide)
Participants in this arm will participate in meetings with a member of the research team to review an ICU guide.
The ICU Guide intervention will include three visits with the site RA that are similar in duration to the chaplain visits (based on the single center study, first visit median of 23 minutes, follow-up visit median 12 minutes), with review of a brochure introducing the family member to the ICU including staff, policies and procedures that will be helpful to the family member.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effect of the intervention on surrogate anxiety (GAD-7)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline and 6-8 weeks after the patient has discharged from the hospital
Generalized Anxiety Disorder- 7 (GAD-7) (7 item inventory of anxiety)- assesses subject's self-reported anxiety for the last two weeks. Scores range from 0-21 0= 'Not at all'; 1= 'Several Days'; 2= 'More than half the days'; 3= 'Nearly every day' Scores of 5, 10, and 15 are taken as the cut-off points for mild, moderate and severe anxiety, respectively. When used as a screening tool, further evaluation is recommended when the score is 10 or greater. Using the threshold score of 10, the GAD-7 has a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 82% for GAD.
Assessed at baseline and 6-8 weeks after the patient has discharged from the hospital

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effect of the intervention on surrogate spiritual well-being (FACIT-Sp)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline and 6-8 weeks after the patient has discharged from the hospital
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being (FACIT- Sp) Scale, a 12-item questionnaire used to measure spiritual well-being in people with chronic illnesses. It assesses aspects like meaning, peace, and faith, and is widely used in research and clinical settings, particularly for patients with cancer and other serious health conditions.
Assessed at baseline and 6-8 weeks after the patient has discharged from the hospital
Decision making quality (FS-ICU)
Time Frame: Assessed 6-8 weeks after the patient has discharged from the hospital
Family Satisfaction with the ICU Process of Decision Making Subscale, a 4 item inventory of decision making quality
Assessed 6-8 weeks after the patient has discharged from the hospital
Satisfaction with Spiritual Care (PSI-C)
Time Frame: Assessed 6-8 weeks after the patient has discharged from the hospital
Patient Satisfaction Instrument- Chaplaincy includes 23 clinical statements which are rated on a 4 (strongly agree) to 1 (strongly disagree) scale.
Assessed 6-8 weeks after the patient has discharged from the hospital

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospice enrollment
Time Frame: Assessed 3 months after the patient has discharged from the hospital
Total count of patients in both groups who enroll in hospice during the hospitalization
Assessed 3 months after the patient has discharged from the hospital
ICU length of stay
Time Frame: Assessed 3 months after the patient has discharged from the hospital
Total length of stay for patients in both groups
Assessed 3 months after the patient has discharged from the hospital
DNR declaration
Time Frame: Assessed 3 months after the patient has discharged from the hospital
Total count of patients in both groups who changed their code status to DNR during the hospitalization
Assessed 3 months after the patient has discharged from the hospital
Comfort plan initiation
Time Frame: Assessed 3 months after the patient has discharged from the hospital
Total count of patients in both groups who initiated a comfort plan during the hospitalization
Assessed 3 months after the patient has discharged from the hospital
Receipt of life sustaining interventions
Time Frame: Assessed 3 months after the patient has discharged from the hospital
Total count of patients in both groups who received life sustaining interventions during the hospitalization.
Assessed 3 months after the patient has discharged from the hospital
Acceptability of the Intervention (AIM)
Time Frame: Assessed 6-8 weeks after the patient has discharged from the hospital
The acceptability of the intervention measure (AIM) is a 4 item scale. Scores range from 1 to 5 for each item. Total scores range from 4 to 20. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability of the intervention.
Assessed 6-8 weeks after the patient has discharged from the hospital
Acceptability of psychological interventions (TAAS)
Time Frame: Assessed 6-8 weeks after the patient has discharged from the hospital
The Treatment Acceptability and Adherence Scale (TAAS) is a 10 item scale developed to measure the acceptability of psychological interventions. Scores range from 1 to 7 for each item. Total scores range from 10 to 70. Higher scores indicate greater treatment acceptability and adherence.
Assessed 6-8 weeks after the patient has discharged from the hospital
Overall distress (Distress thermometer) during the ICU stay
Time Frame: Days 2, 4, and 6 after enrollment and two days weekly thereafter until discharge from the ICU, up to 3 weeks.
Total scores on distress thermometer (single item survey) will be tracked throughout the ICU stay. Text prompts using HIPAA compliant software will be sent.
Days 2, 4, and 6 after enrollment and two days weekly thereafter until discharge from the ICU, up to 3 weeks.
Spiritual well being during the ICU stay
Time Frame: Days 2, 4, and 6 after enrollment and two days weekly thereafter until discharge from the ICU, up to 3 weeks.
Spiritual well being will be assessed using the at peace single item question of spiritual distress. Text prompts using HIPAA compliant software will be sent.
Days 2, 4, and 6 after enrollment and two days weekly thereafter until discharge from the ICU, up to 3 weeks.
Decision making quality during the ICU stay for participants who make a medical decision
Time Frame: Days 2, 4, and 6 after enrollment and weekly thereafter until discharge from the ICU, up to 3 weeks, for those who endorse making a medical decision.
Decision making quality scores will be based on responses to the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) Effective Decisions Subscale, a validated four item survey of medical decision making quality in the hospital. Scores range from 0 to 4 on each item. Scores range from 0 to 16. Higher scores indicate better decision quality. Text prompts using HIPAA compliant software will be sent.
Days 2, 4, and 6 after enrollment and weekly thereafter until discharge from the ICU, up to 3 weeks, for those who endorse making a medical decision.
Depression (PHQ-2) during the ICU stay
Time Frame: Days 1, 3, 5, and 7 after enrollment and weekly thereafter until discharge from the ICU, up to 3 weeks.
Depression scores will be assessed using the validated 2-item version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-2. Scores range from 0 to 3 for each item. Total scores range from 0 to 6. Higher scores indicate higher likelihood of depression. Text prompts using HIPAA compliant software will be sent.
Days 1, 3, 5, and 7 after enrollment and weekly thereafter until discharge from the ICU, up to 3 weeks.
Anxiety (GAD-2) during the ICU stay
Time Frame: Days 1, 3, 5, and 7 after enrollment and weekly thereafter until discharge from the ICU, up to 3 weeks.
Anxiety scores will be assessed using the validated 2-item version of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2. Scores range from 0 to 3 for each item. Total scores range from 0 to 6. Higher scores indicate higher likelihood of anxiety. Text prompts using HIPAA compliant software will be sent.
Days 1, 3, 5, and 7 after enrollment and weekly thereafter until discharge from the ICU, up to 3 weeks.
Communication quality (FICS-5) during the ICU stay
Time Frame: Days 1, 3, 5, and 7 after enrollment and weekly thereafter until discharge from the ICU, up to 3 weeks.
Communication quality scores will be based on responses to the Family Inpatient Communication Survey-5, a validated five item survey of communication quality in the hospital. Scores range from 1 to 5 for each item. Total scores range from 5 to 25. Higher scores indicate better communication quality in the hospital. Text prompts using HIPAA compliant software will be sent.
Days 1, 3, 5, and 7 after enrollment and weekly thereafter until discharge from the ICU, up to 3 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 8, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 27922
  • R56AG086388 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety

Clinical Trials on Spiritual Care Assessment and Intervention (SCAI) Framework

Subscribe