- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07232017
Implementation of Intensive Hypertension Management Approaches: Cleveland Clinic (IN-HOME BP)
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Primary care providers will offer the program to patients in Northeast Ohio with a hypertension diagnosis and aged 18-85, except those who are pregnant, have stage 5 chronic kidney disease or end stage renal disease, or enrolled in hospice care. The project time frame is 48 months. Quantitative and qualitative methods will be used to evaluate implementation and effectiveness outcomes associated with the program. Electronic medical records and surveys will be the key data sources for the quantitative evaluation. Qualitative data collection methods will include semi-structured interviews, field observations, and periodic reflections.
Specific Aims Aim 1. To prepare for implementation of the intensive HTN management program across all Northeast Ohio Primary Care Practices (Pre-Implementation) Pre-Implementation Phase (12 months)
- Quantitative assessment of practice variation in HTN control.
- Qualitative assessment of practice barriers and facilitators to HTN management.
- Creation of a clinical decision support tool for program referral.
- Creation of project-specific patient and employee Advisory Panel.
- Pharmacist and advanced practice provider (APP) training for delivery of the program.
- Practice facilitation training with the Cleveland Clinic continuous improvement team.
- Community Health Worker/Primary Care Navigator Training for Patient Outreach.
- Creation of presentations for primary care staff meetings. Aim 2. To implement the intensive HTN management program across all Northeast Ohio Primary Care Practices (Rollout and Active Implementation) Implementation Phase (24 months)
- Stepped wedge rollout of intensive HTN management program.
- Implementation of the clinical decision support tool at implementation sites.
- Community Health Worker/Primary Care Navigator outreach to patients.
- Delivery of Presentations at primary care staff meetings.
- Practice Facilitation at Implementation Sites.
- Qualitative data collection regarding patient and provider implementation outcomes of acceptability and feasibility.
- Quantitative data collection of implementation outcomes of adoption, fidelity, effectiveness, implementation cost; provider surveys re: acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility.
- Patient and employee advisory panel input into implementation evaluation. Aim 3. To monitor and evaluate the maintenance of the intensive HTN management program across all Northeast Ohio Primary Care Practices (Maintenance) Maintenance Phase (9 months)
- Quantitative data collection of implementation outcomes-reach, adoption, fidelity, effectiveness, cost-compared to the active implementation phase.
- Capture practice-level adaptations with comparison to the active implementation phase.
- Complete final data collection and analyses.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Anita Misra-Hebert, MD, MPH, FACP
- Phone Number: 216-445-8542
- Email: MISRAA@ccf.org
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Christopher Babuich, MD
- Phone Number: 440 204-7400
- Email: babiucc@ccf.org
Study Locations
-
-
Ohio
-
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
- Recruiting
- Cleveland Clinic
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Hypertension diagnosis, aged 18-85 years old
- Uncontrolled blood pressure, defined as a blood pressure reading of > 150/95
Exclusion Criteria:
- pregnant, stage 5 chronic kidney disease, End Stage Renal Disease, enrolled in hospice care
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
IN-HOME BP: titrating BP medications based on patient-recorded home blood pressure readings
This project will utilize evidence from a randomized controlled trial by Margolis et al.(1) to build upon Cleveland Clinic's existing team-based primary care provider (PCP) collaboration with pharmacists and advanced practice providers (APP) and will use a mechanism that allows titrating blood pressure medications based on patient-recorded home blood pressure readings.
|
A team-based approach with a primary care provider (PCP) collaborating with pharmacists and advanced practice providers (APP) and will use a mechanism (frequent follow-up- phone or virtual appointments) that allows titrating blood pressure medications based on patient-recorded home blood pressure readings.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Systolic Blood Pressure Change
Time Frame: Patients will be followed for up to 33 months: 24-month implementation/intervention period and 9-month maintenance period.
|
The main effectiveness finding the investigators expect to report at the end of the proposed implementation project is the change in patient systolic blood pressure from baseline to 12 months post-implementation.
The expected change in systolic blood pressure based upon Margolis et al.(1) is -18mmHg.
The period of evaluation will be from the time of program enrollment, with home BP measurements assessed every 2-3 weeks until the blood pressure is less than 135/85 and at 12 months.
The blood pressure will continue to be measured every 6 months through the full the 24-month implementation/intervention period (allowing all sites to roll out the intervention) and a 9-month maintenance period.
|
Patients will be followed for up to 33 months: 24-month implementation/intervention period and 9-month maintenance period.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Diastolic Blood Pressure Change
Time Frame: The patient's blood pressure will be measured for up to 33 months (24-month implementation/intervention period and 9-month maintenance period). Every 2-3 weeks during intervention, at 12 months, then every 6 months through maintenance.
|
Change in the patient's diastolic blood pressure from baseline as measured in mmHg.
|
The patient's blood pressure will be measured for up to 33 months (24-month implementation/intervention period and 9-month maintenance period). Every 2-3 weeks during intervention, at 12 months, then every 6 months through maintenance.
|
|
Reach (Actual): Patients Offered, Initiated, Completed
Time Frame: Measured every 3 months for up to 33 months.
|
Number of patients who were offered, who initiated, and completed the intensive HTN intervention program.
Measured by total number at sorted by each: offered, initiated, completed.
|
Measured every 3 months for up to 33 months.
|
|
Effectiveness: Equity in Outcomes (Race)
Time Frame: Every 2-3 weeks during intervention, at 12 months, then every 6 months through maintenance: for up to 33 months.
|
Blood pressure change stratified by demographic factors, specifically race.
Measured as percentage of black, white, and other.
|
Every 2-3 weeks during intervention, at 12 months, then every 6 months through maintenance: for up to 33 months.
|
|
Effectiveness: Equity in Outcomes (Ethnicity)
Time Frame: Every 2-3 weeks during intervention, at 12 months, then every 6 months through maintenance: for up to 33 months.
|
Blood pressure change stratified by demographic factors, specifically ethnicity.
Measured by percentage of Hispanic and non-Hispanic
|
Every 2-3 weeks during intervention, at 12 months, then every 6 months through maintenance: for up to 33 months.
|
|
Effectiveness: Equity in Outcomes (Gender)
Time Frame: Every 2-3 weeks during intervention, at 12 months, then every 6 months through maintenance: for up to 33 months.
|
Blood pressure change stratified by demographic factors, specifically gender.
Measured by percentage of male and female.
|
Every 2-3 weeks during intervention, at 12 months, then every 6 months through maintenance: for up to 33 months.
|
|
Effectiveness: Equity in Outcomes (Age)
Time Frame: Every 2-3 weeks during intervention, at 12 months, then every 6 months through maintenance: for up to 33 months.
|
Blood pressure change stratified by demographic factors, specifically age group.
Measured in years.
|
Every 2-3 weeks during intervention, at 12 months, then every 6 months through maintenance: for up to 33 months.
|
|
Effectiveness: Equity in Outcomes (Insurance)
Time Frame: Every 2-3 weeks during intervention, at 12 months, then every 6 months through maintenance: for up to 33 months.
|
Blood pressure change stratified by demographic factors, specifically insurance.
Measured in number of insurance: Medicare, Medicaid, Commercial, Self-pay.
|
Every 2-3 weeks during intervention, at 12 months, then every 6 months through maintenance: for up to 33 months.
|
|
Effectiveness: Medication change
Time Frame: Every 2-3 weeks during intervention then every 6 months through maintenance: for up to 33 months.
|
Change from baseline medication regimen (medication class and dosage).
|
Every 2-3 weeks during intervention then every 6 months through maintenance: for up to 33 months.
|
|
Effectiveness: Medication Adherence
Time Frame: Every 2-3 weeks during intervention then every 6 months through maintenance: for up to 33 months.
|
Pharmacy Fill Data
|
Every 2-3 weeks during intervention then every 6 months through maintenance: for up to 33 months.
|
|
Effectiveness: Cardiovascular outcomes
Time Frame: Baseline, and every 6 months through maintenance: for up to 33 months.
|
Sustained blood pressure control resulting in decreased cardiovascular risk: reported myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, heart failure, arrhythmia, and death.
|
Baseline, and every 6 months through maintenance: for up to 33 months.
|
|
Effectiveness: Acute Renal Failure - Change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR).
Time Frame: Every 6 months through maintenance: for up to 33 months.
|
Assessing acute renal failure by change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) as measured in milliliters/minute/1.73 meters squared.
|
Every 6 months through maintenance: for up to 33 months.
|
|
Effectiveness: PROMIS-10 Survey
Time Frame: Baseline at intake visit then at 12 months: up to 24-months.
|
See improvement of patient report outcomes captured at pre-visit PROMIS-10 survey(12) administration as part of routine clinical care.
As measured by assessing scores over time.
|
Baseline at intake visit then at 12 months: up to 24-months.
|
|
Effectiveness: Adverse Effects
Time Frame: Every 2-3 weeks during intervention then every 6 months through maintenance: for up to 33 months.
|
Patient reported adverse effects at follow-up visits during intervention.
Measured as number of effects reported by patient.
|
Every 2-3 weeks during intervention then every 6 months through maintenance: for up to 33 months.
|
|
Implementation: Provider views of the Acceptability, Appropriateness, and Feasibility survey
Time Frame: Every 6 months starting throughout active implementation and maintenance: for up to 33 months.
|
Captured through surveys, provider views of Acceptability, Appropriateness, Feasibility (13).
Providers views of intervention may impact adoption of intervention for patients.
Measured by change in item scored over time.
|
Every 6 months starting throughout active implementation and maintenance: for up to 33 months.
|
|
Primary Care Provider Adoption
Time Frame: Every 3 months during intervention period: for up to 24 months
|
Number of providers in each practice group referring to the Intensive HTN program will be measured by the number of referrals attributed to practice group.
|
Every 3 months during intervention period: for up to 24 months
|
|
Pharmacist Adoption
Time Frame: Every 3 months during intervention period: for up to 24 months.
|
Number of patients in the program attributed to the trained pharmacy providers eligible to deliver the program.
|
Every 3 months during intervention period: for up to 24 months.
|
|
Advanced Practice Provider Adoption
Time Frame: Every 3 months during intervention period: for up to 24 months.
|
Number of patients in the program attributed to the trained Advanced Practice Providers (APP) eligible to deliver the program.
|
Every 3 months during intervention period: for up to 24 months.
|
|
Formal Qualitative Assessment of context of high proportion of HTN control and low proportion of HTN control practices: Pre-Implementation
Time Frame: Pre-Implementation: up to 12 months.
|
To understand barriers and facilitators to achieving HTN control
|
Pre-Implementation: up to 12 months.
|
|
Formal Qualitative Assessment: Observations of Employee and Patient Advisory Panels
Time Frame: Quarterly meetings throughout pre- and active implementation: up to 36 months.
|
To examine anticipated barriers and facilitators to implementation and to assess ongoing implementation activities.
Qualitative methodologists will analyze the qualitative data (fieldnotes) will be coded to reflect key domains of interest and emergent themes.
|
Quarterly meetings throughout pre- and active implementation: up to 36 months.
|
|
Formal Qualitative Assessment: Semi-structured Interviews with Patients at High/Low proportion of HTN Control
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months during active implementation: up to 24 months.
|
Inviting a sample of patients receiving the intervention at high and low proportion of HTN control practices to participate in interviews to assess perceptions of acceptability of the intensive HTN management program. Qualitative methodologists will analyze the qualitative data (transcripts) will be coded to reflect key domains of interest and emergent themes. |
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months during active implementation: up to 24 months.
|
|
Formal Qualitative Assessment: Periodic Reflections with agents of implementation
Time Frame: Monthly or bimonthly throughout active implementation and maintenance: for up to 33 months.
|
Periodic reflections conducted with a subgroup of pool of primary care providers, pharmacists, and APPs across practice locations to understand barriers and facilitators to achieving hypertension control. Qualitative methodologists will analyze the qualitative data (descriptive fieldnotes) will be coded to reflect key domains of interest and emergent themes. |
Monthly or bimonthly throughout active implementation and maintenance: for up to 33 months.
|
|
Outcome measure type: Effectiveness (Hospitalizations / Emergency Department Visits)
Time Frame: Every 6 months: up to 33 months.
|
Hospitalizations and Emergency Department Visits: number of acute care hospitalizations, number of emergency department visits.
Determining association between intensive HTN management and acute care utilization.
|
Every 6 months: up to 33 months.
|
|
Outcome Measure Type: Effectiveness (Outpatient Visits)
Time Frame: Every 6 months: up to 33 months.
|
Outpatient visits other than for the intensive HTN management program.
Number of outpatient visits (in-clinic or virtual, primary care and specialty).
To determine association between intensive HTN management and acute care utilization.
|
Every 6 months: up to 33 months.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Margolis KL, Bergdall AR, Crain AL, JaKa MM, Anderson JP, Solberg LI, Sperl-Hillen J, Beran M, Green BB, Haugen P, Norton CK, Kodet AJ, Sharma R, Appana D, Trower NK, Pawloski PA, Rehrauer DJ, Simmons ML, McKinney ZJ, Kottke TE, Ziegenfuss JY, Williams RA, O'Connor PJ. Comparing Pharmacist-Led Telehealth Care and Clinic-Based Care for Uncontrolled High Blood Pressure: The Hyperlink 3 Pragmatic Cluster-Randomized Trial. Hypertension. 2022 Dec;79(12):2708-2720. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.19816. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
- Cuttaree P, Edlund G, Eriksson M, Granberg P, Lager O, Lonberg E, Sjoberg P, Widell K. [Should sick children be kept in bed?]. Lakartidningen. 1971 Mar 24;68(13):1485-8. No abstract available. Swedish.
- Murakami K, Minoshima S, Uno K, Arimizu N, Kobayashi M, Fujita M, Okamoto S, Ikehira H, Fukuda H, Tateno Y. [Imaging of malignant melanoma with In-111-labeled monoclonal antibody (ZME-018) and Ga-67 scintigraphy]. Kaku Igaku. 1989 Jan;26(1):113-9. No abstract available. Japanese.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 25-792
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hypertension (HTN)
-
Chinese University of Hong KongHue University of Medicine and PharmacyNot yet recruiting
-
Sarfez Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Recruiting
-
University Hospital, GrenobleRecruiting
-
Arnatar Therapeutics, Inc.Completed
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Foundation University IslamabadRecruiting
-
Arnatar Therapeutics, Inc.Active, not recruiting
-
Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Enrolling by invitation
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsRecruitingHypertension (HTN)United States, Singapore
-
Aktiia SAMassachusetts General Hospital; Brigham and Women's HospitalRecruitingHypertension (HTN)United States
Clinical Trials on IN-HOME BP
-
Shanghai Institute of HypertensionRecruiting
-
US Department of Veterans AffairsCompleted
-
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, TaiwanUnknown
-
University of AlbertaRecruiting
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentRecruiting
-
Taipei Medical UniversityNational Science Council, TaiwanCompleted
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)CompletedHypertensionUnited States
-
Kaiser PermanenteCompleted
-
Kaiser PermanenteUniversity of Colorado, Denver; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
NYU Langone HealthNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)CompletedStroke | HypertensionUnited States