- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07232927
Evaluation of Hemostatic Agents in Partial Nephrectomy (HEMOSTA-PN)
Evaluation of Hemostatic Agents in Partial Nephrectomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the standard surgical treatment for localized renal tumors, providing oncologic efficacy comparable to radical nephrectomy while preserving renal function. Despite technological advances, hemorrhage and urinary leakage remain major perioperative challenges. Various hemostatic agents have been introduced to improve intraoperative hemostasis and collecting system closure, including gelatin-thrombin matrices (FloSeal®) and oxidized regenerated cellulose (Surgicel®). However, the true clinical value of these agents remains controversial due to limited high-quality evidence.
This prospective, randomized, single-center trial was conducted at Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology. The study enrolled 150 patients with localized renal masses (clinical stage T1a-T1b) scheduled for partial nephrectomy between January 2023 and December 2024. Patients were randomized equally into three groups: Group A (suturing only), Group B (suturing with FloSeal®), and Group C (suturing with Surgicel®). All surgeries were performed by a single experienced urologic surgeon using open, laparoscopic, or robotic approaches according to tumor complexity and patient preference.
The primary endpoints were the incidence of clinically significant postoperative hemorrhage requiring transfusion, urinary leakage/fistula, and oncologic safety assessed by positive surgical margins. Secondary outcomes included operative and ischemia times, estimated blood loss, postoperative renal function, and length of hospital stay. Statistical analyses included ANOVA, chi-square, logistic regression, and ROC curve analyses to identify predictors of perioperative complications and surgical margin positivity.
This study provides prospective evidence that adjunctive hemostatic agents do not significantly reduce postoperative hemorrhage or urinary leakage rates and do not influence oncologic safety. Perioperative outcomes are mainly determined by tumor and surgical factors rather than the use of hemostatic materials.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ankara
-
Ankara, Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye), 06590
- Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged 18 years or older.
- Diagnosed with localized renal mass (clinical stage T1a-T1b) suitable for partial nephrectomy.
- Adequate preoperative renal function to undergo surgery.
- Signed informed consent obtained prior to study enrollment.
- Undergoing open, laparoscopic, or robotic partial nephrectomy performed by the same experienced surgeon.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with solitary kidney or bilateral renal tumors.
- History of previous renal surgery on the same kidney.
- Evidence of metastatic disease or locally advanced (≥T2) renal tumors.
- Coagulopathy, bleeding disorders, or ongoing anticoagulant therapy that cannot be discontinued.
- Active urinary tract infection or systemic infection.
- Known allergy or hypersensitivity to gelatin or oxidized cellulose components.
- Patients who decline participation or withdraw consent.
- Incomplete perioperative data or loss to follow-up.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Group A - Suturing Only
Standard parenchymal suturing technique without use of adjunctive hemostatic material.
|
Standard parenchymal suturing technique performed during partial nephrectomy without the use of adjunctive hemostatic materials.
Serves as the control arm in the study.
|
|
Experimental: Group B - Suturing + FloSeal®
Parenchymal suturing performed with adjunctive application of gelatin-thrombin matrix (FloSeal®).
|
Partial nephrectomy performed with parenchymal suturing combined with gelatin-thrombin matrix (FloSeal®) as an adjunctive hemostatic agent.
|
|
Experimental: Group C - Suturing + Surgicel®
Parenchymal suturing performed with adjunctive use of oxidized regenerated cellulose (Surgicel®).
|
Partial nephrectomy performed with parenchymal suturing combined with oxidized regenerated cellulose (Surgicel®) as an adjunctive hemostatic agent.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of clinically significant postoperative hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion
Time Frame: From postoperative Day 0 through postoperative Day 30
|
Presence of postoperative bleeding requiring blood transfusion, radiologic, or surgical intervention, recorded according to standardized clinical criteria.
|
From postoperative Day 0 through postoperative Day 30
|
|
Incidence of postoperative urinary leakage or fistula
Time Frame: From postoperative Day 0 through postoperative Day 30
|
Detection of urinary leakage based on drain creatinine measurement or radiologic evidence of fistula following partial nephrectomy.
|
From postoperative Day 0 through postoperative Day 30
|
|
Rate of positive surgical margins
Time Frame: At pathological assessment (Day of surgery)
|
Pathologic assessment of surgical margins on resected tumor specimens to evaluate oncologic safety.
|
At pathological assessment (Day of surgery)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean operative time and warm ischemia time
Time Frame: Intraoperative (Day of surgery)
|
Duration of surgery (skin-to-skin time) and warm ischemia time measured intraoperatively in minutes.
|
Intraoperative (Day of surgery)
|
|
Estimated blood loss during surgery
Time Frame: Intraoperative (Day of surgery)
|
Total blood loss recorded by anesthesia team and surgical staff.
|
Intraoperative (Day of surgery)
|
|
Change in postoperative renal function (serum creatinine and eGFR)
Time Frame: Preoperative (1 day before surgery) and postoperative Day 30
|
Comparison of preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine and eGFR values to assess renal function preservation.
|
Preoperative (1 day before surgery) and postoperative Day 30
|
|
Postoperative hospital stay
Time Frame: From postoperative Day 0 until discharge, assessed for up to 30 days.
|
Number of days from operation until hospital discharge.
|
From postoperative Day 0 until discharge, assessed for up to 30 days.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Di Maida F, Campi R, Lane BR, De Cobelli O, Sanguedolce F, Hatzichristodoulou G, Antonelli A, Grosso AA, Noyes S, Rodriguez-Faba O, Keeley FX, Langenhuijsen J, Musi G, Klatte T, Roscigno M, Akdogan B, Furlan M, Simeone C, Karakoyunlu N, Marszalek M, Capitanio U, Volpe A, Brookman-May S, Gschwend JE, Smaldone MC, Uzzo RG, Kutikov A, Minervini A, Sib International Consortium. Predictors of Positive Surgical Margins after Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Localized Renal Tumors: Insights from a Large Multicenter International Prospective Observational Project (The Surface-Intermediate-Base Margin Score Consortium). J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 23;11(7):1765. doi: 10.3390/jcm11071765.
- Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A, Blute ML, Chow GK, Derweesh IH, Faraday MM, Kaouk JH, Leveillee RJ, Matin SF, Russo P, Uzzo RG; Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Urological Association. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol. 2009 Oct;182(4):1271-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.004. Epub 2009 Aug 14. No abstract available.
- Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Abu-Ghanem Y, Bedke J, Capitanio U, Dabestani S, Fernandez-Pello S, Giles RH, Hofmann F, Hora M, Klatte T, Kuusk T, Lam TB, Marconi L, Powles T, Tahbaz R, Volpe A, Bex A. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2022 Update. Eur Urol. 2022 Oct;82(4):399-410. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.03.006. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
- Zargar H, Khalifeh A, Autorino R, Akca O, Brandao LF, Laydner H, Krishnan J, Samarasekera D, Haber GP, Stein RJ, Kaouk JH. Urine leak in minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: analysis of risk factors and role of intraoperative ureteral catheterization. Int Braz J Urol. 2014 Nov-Dec;40(6):763-71. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.06.07.
- Erlich T, Abu-Ghanem Y, Ramon J, Mor Y, Rosenzweig B, Dotan Z. Postoperative Urinary Leakage Following Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Mass: Risk Factors and a Proposed Algorithm for the Diagnosis and Management. Scand J Surg. 2017 Jun;106(2):139-144. doi: 10.1177/1457496916659225. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
- Kola O, Smigelski M, Nagpal S, Gogaj R, Taneja SS, Wysock JS, Huang WC. Urine leak and vascular complications following robotic partial nephrectomy: a contemporary single-center experience. J Robot Surg. 2024 Oct 29;18(1):387. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02096-1.
- Maurice MJ, Ramirez D, Kara O, Malkoc E, Nelson RJ, Caputo PA, Kaouk JH. Omission of Hemostatic Agents During Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Does Not Increase Postoperative Bleeding Risk. J Endourol. 2016 Aug;30(8):877-83. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0192.
- Basu S, Khan IA, Das RK, Dey RK, Khan D, Agarwal V. RENAL nephrometry score: Predicting perioperative outcomes following open partial nephrectomy. Urol Ann. 2019 Apr-Jun;11(2):187-192. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_93_18.
- Abu-Ghanem Y, Dotan Z, Kaver I, Zilberman DE, Ramon J. The use of Haemostatic Agents does not impact the rate of hemorrhagic complications in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for renal masses. Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 30;6:32376. doi: 10.1038/srep32376.
- Aykan S, Temiz MZ, Ulus I, Yilmaz M, Gonultas S, Suzan S, Semercioz A, Muslumanoglu AY. The Use of Three Different Hemostatic Agents during Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Comparison of Surgical and Early Renal Functional Outcomes. Eurasian J Med. 2019 Jun;51(2):160-164. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2018.18293.
- Veccia A, Autorino R. Is there a relation between preserved renal function and oncological outcomes in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma? Ann Transl Med. 2018 Nov;6(Suppl 1):S88. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.11.01. No abstract available.
- Tonyali S, Koni A, Yazici S, Bilen CY. The Safety and Efficacy of Adjuvant Hemostatic Agents During Laparoscopic Nephron-Sparing Surgery: Comparison of Tachosil and Floseal Versus No Hemostatic Agents. Urol J. 2017 Jan 23;15(1):21-25. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4090.
- Richter F, Schnorr D, Deger S, Trk I, Roigas J, Wille A, Loening SA. Improvement of hemostasis in open and laparoscopically performed partial nephrectomy using a gelatin matrix-thrombin tissue sealant (FloSeal). Urology. 2003 Jan;61(1):73-7. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02143-x.
- Gill IS, Ramani AP, Spaliviero M, Xu M, Finelli A, Kaouk JH, Desai MM. Improved hemostasis during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using gelatin matrix thrombin sealant. Urology. 2005 Mar;65(3):463-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.10.030.
- Carrion DM, Y Gregorio SA, Rivas JG, Bazan AA, Sebastian JD, Martinez-Pineiro L. The role of hemostatic agents in preventing complications in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Cent European J Urol. 2017;70(4):362-367. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2017.1432. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
- Shao IH, Lee CL, Lin YH, Wang HS, Chen MC, Chang YH, Sheng TW, Huang LK, Kan HC, Liu CY, Lin PH, Yu KJ, Chuang CK, Pang ST, Wu CT. Predicting hemorrhagic complications in robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: simplifying risk assessment with tumor diameter and depth. J Robot Surg. 2025 Jul 10;19(1):368. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02537-5.
- Blachman-Braun R, Patel M, Loebach L, Millan B, Saini J, Gurram S, Linehan WM, Ball MW. Urinary leak after partial nephrectomy: Insights from a cohort with hereditary, multifocal, and reoperative cases. Urol Oncol. 2025 Aug;43(8):470.e11-470.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.03.013. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
- Ryan J, MacCraith E, Davis NF, McLornan L. A systematic management algorithm for perioperative complications after robotic assisted partial nephrectomy. Can Urol Assoc J. 2019 Nov;13(11):E371-E376. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5750.
- Peyton CC, Hajiran A, Morgan K, Azizi M, Tang D, Chipollini J, Gilbert SM, Poch M, Sexton WJ, Spiess PE. Urinary leak following partial nephrectomy: a contemporary review of 975 cases. Can J Urol. 2020 Feb;27(1):10118-10124.
- Li KP, Chen SY, Wang CY, Yang L. Comparison between minimally invasive partial nephrectomy and open partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2023 Jun 1;109(6):1769-1782. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000397.
- Capitanio U, Terrone C, Antonelli A, Minervini A, Volpe A, Furlan M, Matloob R, Regis F, Fiori C, Porpiglia F, Di Trapani E, Zacchero M, Serni S, Salonia A, Carini M, Simeone C, Montorsi F, Bertini R. Nephron-sparing techniques independently decrease the risk of cardiovascular events relative to radical nephrectomy in patients with a T1a-T1b renal mass and normal preoperative renal function. Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):683-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.027. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
- Cao Y, Cui Y, Li R, Tang X, Lin C, Yang X, Liu J, Zhao Q, Ma J, de Oliveira Paludo A, Schmeusser BN, Wang S, Du P. Comparing the long-term prognosis and renal function changes of partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) in T1 stage renal cell carcinoma patients. Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Mar 30;14(3):740-750. doi: 10.21037/tau-2025-136. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Urogenital Diseases
- Pathologic Processes
- Urogenital Neoplasms
- Neoplasms by Site
- Neoplasms
- Male Urogenital Diseases
- Kidney Diseases
- Urologic Diseases
- Female Urogenital Diseases
- Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
- Neoplasms by Histologic Type
- Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial
- Adenocarcinoma
- Urologic Neoplasms
- Carcinoma
- Kidney Neoplasms
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell
- Hemorrhage
- Surgical Equipment
- Equipment and Supplies
- Surgical Fixation Devices
- Sutures
- FloSeal Matrix
- Surgicel
Other Study ID Numbers
- İ3-191-20
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Partial Nephrectomy
-
270SurgicalNot yet recruitingLaparoscopy | Nephrectomy | Partial NephrectomyIsrael
-
Distalmotion SACompletedHysterectomy | Partial Nephrectomy | Right ColectomySwitzerland, Germany, France
-
First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University; The First Affiliated...Active, not recruitingPartial Nephrectomy | Renal Hilum Tumors | Urinary LeakageChina
-
The Cleveland ClinicTerminated
-
Integra LifeSciences CorporationCompletedBenign, Malignant Tumors or Other Soft Tissue Removal | Nephrectomy or Partial Nephrectomy With Parenchyma RemovalGermany, Italy
-
Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterTerminatedNephrectomy | Partial Nephrectomy | Incision Site DiscomfortUnited States
-
Yonsei UniversityCompletedthe Patients With Partial NephrectomyKorea, Republic of
-
RWTH Aachen UniversityGerman Research FoundationCompleted
-
Intuitive SurgicalRecruitingHernia, Inguinal | Hernia, Ventral | Colorectal | Thoracic | Partial Nephrectomy | GynecologicUnited States
-
The Netherlands Cancer InstituteCompleted
Clinical Trials on Standard Parenchymal Suturing
-
Minia UniversityRecruitingPeriampullary Cancer | Pancreas Cancer | Pancreaticoduodenectomy | Postoperative Pancreatic FistulaEgypt
-
Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City HospitalCompletedEpisiotomy Wound | Labor; Prolonged, Second StageTurkey
-
Allama Iqbal Teaching HospitalCompletedWound Infection, Surgical | Dehiscence of Laparotomy Wound | Laparotomy Closure After Abdominal Surgery | Suture, Interrupted | Continuous SuturePakistan
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedSurgical Site Infection
-
RESnTEC, Institute of ResearchCompleted
-
Children Hospital and Institute of Child Health...CompletedPain, Acute PostoperativePakistan
-
King Edward Medical UniversityRecruitingBowel Perforated | Duodenal PerforationPakistan
-
Diala BurjakCompletedStudent Education | Hands-on Training | Online Education | Suture Techniques | Training EffectivenessJordan
-
Jagiellonian UniversityCompletedEndoscopic Surgical ProceduresPoland
-
Huma IjazCompletedEpisiotomy Wound | Episiotomy Extended by LacerationPakistan